|
What’s
the correct definition of hunger? The dictionary meaning
of hunger is “a feeling of pain, emptiness or weakness
induced by lack of food.”
Another
definition is provided by a doctor: “A condition in
which people do not get enough food to provide the
nutrients for fully productive, active and healthful
lives, resulting in shortfalls in nutritional status and
reduced chances of survival.”
The
second is more comprehensive because it covers not only
the unavailability and inaccessibility of food, but also
the direct consequences of hunger: malnutrition and
early death.
This
definition is important because, as pointed out by
Socioeconomic Planning Secretary Romulo Neri last week,
hunger is a multidimensional and complex phenomenon that
should be addressed holistically.
It
wasn’t too long ago, of course, that the Social Weather
Stations released survey results showing that one in
every five Filipino families, or 3.4 million households,
had suffered hunger pangs in the past three months at
least once. Administration apologists promptly pounced
on the survey results as “unfair” and “biased,” and
ignored government efforts to address the problem.
No less
than President Arroyo, in an apparent attempt to
downplay the negative impact of the survey results, said
she, too, was a victim of hunger, for she had often
skipped meals due to her heavy work schedule. The
facetious remark only attracted more opprobrium from her
staunch critics.
But it’s
good that the government is taking concrete steps to
tackle the problem of hunger. The Accelerated Hunger
Mitigation Program is already in place, and efforts are
under way to provide social-insurance services to help
poor families reduce expenses and have more funds to
spend on food, according to the National Economic and
Development Authority.
For the
National Nutrition Council (NNC), social insurance
includes boosting the enrollment of food-poor families
under the PhilHealth’s indigent program, and speeding up
the establishment of Botika ng Bayan and Botika ng
Barangay outlets, which make quality and safe medicines
affordable for the poor.
The
holistic approach to hunger mitigation also means more
food-production programs, such as Gulayan para sa Masa,
will be undertaken. The NNC also targets the
establishment of more Barangay Food Terminals,
particularly in the National Capital Region.
The NNC
reports that about 1.7 million clients of microfinance
institutions have already obtained loans for livelihood
activities, and that more than 720,000 individuals have
been given jobs in roadside maintenance, and in the
construction or rehabilitation of farm-to-market roads
and irrigation facilities.
Meanwhile, the Technical Education and Skills
Development Authority claims to have improved the
employability of some 487,000 individuals who have
undergone its training programs.
The
question really is whether all this can be sustained.
The comprehensive, integrated and holistic approach to
hunger—and poverty—is not only necessary, it is the only
way to go.
****
Ensuring tax compliance
The
government wants to contain the budget deficit this year
by P63 billion so it can achieve a balanced budget by
2008.
So where
will it get this amount?
Simple.
If business establishments will only issue official
receipts, the government could be P65 billion richer.
But
wait, there’s more. If taxes were collected from
self-employed professionals and individuals, the
government could raise about P25.5 billion a year,
according to the
National
Tax Research
Center.
All this
is wishful thinking, however, unless the government
cracks the whip and compels business establishments and
professionals to pay up.
Finance
Secretary Margarito Teves has called on individuals and
businesses to pay the appropriate amount of taxes on
time to support the government’s delivery of
infrastructure and social services. “We have to continue
improving our tax collection so that we can provide more
and better infrastructure and social services and
achieve higher and sustained economic growth in the
medium term,” Teves said last week.
We
seriously doubt, however, if business establishments,
professionals and the self-employed will be making a
beeline for BIR offices soon.
What
could work would be two things. One, the DOF can make an
ironclad guarantee that the taxes paid to the national
treasury would really go to much-needed infrastructure
and social services, and not lost to graft and
corruption.
Two, the
government hales corporations and individuals to court
on tax-evasion charges or perhaps shames them in public
as well. If the government really wants to achieve its
goal of investing P1.7 trillion over the next four years
in infrastructure, such as new roads, bridges, ports,
schools, irrigation systems and rural electrification
projects, it should look for other ways to exact
compliance with tax laws.
Teves
seems to be walking too softly by merely invoking the
national welfare or appealing to the emotions or the
patriotism of those who fail to pay the correct taxes.
The
other half of the carrot-and-stick approach in tax
collection is, you guessed it, the stick. It’s time for
Teves and his DOF team to start carrying a big stick as
well. |