|
Is there
a connection between the breach of the constitutional
limit on the foreign ownership in the listed firm
Philippine Racing Club Inc. (PRCI) with a forthcoming
real-estate play in the 21-hectare prime lot in Sta. Ana
Racetrack conservatively valued at P10 billion?
This is
a question swirling over the ongoing corporate brawl at
the listed firm between the Malaysians, on one hand, and
the Filipino directors, on the other, that has caught
the attention of market watchers.
That
breach was flagged by no less than the Philippine Stock
Exchange (PSE) two years ago and yet nothing has come
out of the violation of the foreign ownership cap, which
is set at 40 percent.
Perhaps,
the PSE, which has obtained self-regulatory organization
status, is awaiting for guidance from the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). It has to be noted here,
though, that the breach of the foreign-ownership limit
could similarly open PRCI to violations of the
property-ownership limits.
Market
pundits point out that there could be a connection
between the PSE alert on the foreign-ownership breach
and the limit on property ownership of foreigners to the
protested corporate move of the PRCI board to have the
prime Sta. Ana property, valued at over P10 billion,
folded into JTH Davies, a small company with just P25
million under its name and whose provenance is yet to be
established.
This is
what some directors of the PRCI are crying foul about
and are seeking court redress against the planned move.
That
planned move would have as an effect the transferring of
the crown jewel of the listed racing firm to JTH Davies,
a corporate maneuver which is protested not just for
lack of transparency but for the imbalance in the
swapping of assets.
How
could one explain the transfer of a P10-billion property
to a P25-milllion firm? It is this corporate maneuver
that is said to be at the center of the board
controversy at the PRCI, and it is said that it holds
the key to the announced violation of the
foreign-ownership limit.
We
understand that the main argument of the Filipino
directors questioning the move on the asset
swap—actually that of having a vote in the board of
directors of the PRCI—is that there should be full
disclosure, which is what a listed firm should do.
Indeed,
what are the antecedents of the planned swap in the
light of the breach of foreign-ownership limits and the
possible violation of property-ownership rules with the
ascendancy of Malaysians into the board?
Under
the SEC rules, there is the so-called control test in
determining the nationality of a corporation. This has
to be differentiated with the grandfather rule, which
seeks to determine the foreign ownership in a
corporation by tracing back the foreign interests up to
the grandfather of the firm being subjected to the
foreign-ownership test.
In
essence, the control test is a more liberalized
interpretation of the nationality of a corporation,
whereby the SEC determines whether a corporation is
Filipino or not.
The
question then arises: Is the property swap envisioned by
the PRCI board a way for the company to solve its
problems related to the foreign-ownership limit breach
and that of the property-ownership limits insofar as
foreign interests are concerned? We have to remember
here that foreigners can own up to 40 percent of a
property, but this is limited to condominiums, not to
land, as per the Condominium Law.
Thus,
the PSE announcement on the breach of the foreign cap on
shareholdings of the PRCI is significant, since such a
breach, in effect, constitutes a violation of the
property-ownership limit insofar as the 21-hectare, P10-
billion Sta. Ana Racetrack property is concerned. When
the breach was reached, ownership of the land falls
under scrutiny under the land ownership doctrine,
specifically for foreign interests.
The
Malaysian interest at the PRCI is represented by the
Kuala Lumpur-based Magnum Investments Berhad, which has
four board seats in the racing club. The directors
representing the Malaysian firm are Lim Teong Leong,
Thank Ka Hon, Lawrence Lim Swee Lin and Datuk Surin
Upatkoon. Datuk is known in Malaysia as Lau Khin Koon.
Interestingly, Datuk Surin figured in the so-called
Temasek scandal that embroiled ousted Thai premier
Thaksin Shinawatra, whose family-owned Shin Corp. was
bought by Singapore-based Temasek.
In a
complex transaction that included several companies,
Datuk Surin initially paid $70 million into a company
called Kularb Kaew, which is a majority shareholder of
another firm called Cedar, a majority owner of Shin
Corp.
There
are interesting facets in the eventual takeover by
Temasek of Shin Corp., the seventh-largest company in
Thailand. These developments that saw the fold-in of
Shin Corp. into Temasek have to be studied thoroughly in
the light of the planned fold-in of the PRCI’s prized
Sta. Ana Racetrack property.
Just
what would come about, eventually, in the property swap
is anyone’s guess but, this early, market pundits want
to be apprised on the ongoing corporate brawl that
features Malaysian and Filipino directors.
Email:hugagni@yahoo.com |