|
TWO
nongovernment organizations on Monday called for the
annulment of a multibillion-peso “toxic debt” that was
used to finance the importation of medical waste
incinerators by the Department of Health (DOH) 10 years
ago.
Saying
that the government was “duped” into buying the
“expensive yet totally defective and useless machines”
at the expense of the public- health sector, the Eco
Waste Coalition (EcoWaste) and the Freedom from Debt
Coalition (FDC) called on the national government to
rescind the contract and immediately stop paying the
loans to the Austrian Bank.
EcoWaste
and FDC, during the press launch of its “Stop Toxic Debt
Campaign” in Quezon City on Monday, said the loan, which
was contracted in 1997 between the Bank Austria and the
Department of Finance (DOF), will have to be paid until
2014.
The loan
financed the DOH’s P500-billion “Austrian Project for
the Establishment of Waste-Disposal Facilities and
Upgrading of the Medical Equipment Standard in DOH
Hospitals,” which was originally intended to provide
development assistance to Philippine hospitals in the
area of medical waste management.
Its
major component, which is waste disposal, costs P241,678
million in 1996, the year the project was conceived, in
an attempt to solve the growing medical waste-disposal
problem in the country.
All of
the 26 incinerators, with capacities of 300 kilos to 500
kilos of waste per day, and purchased from Vamed
Engineering, cost P133,208,665, and were delivered and
installed in 26 DOH-controlled hospitals in 1997 and
1998.
What
made the deal highly questionable was the fact that the
technology vendor, Vamed Engineering, is partly owned by
Bank Austria, the groups said.
Greenpeace, which first brought up the issue in 2002,
was surprised to learn that the government is still
paying the loan, despite the fact that incinerators that
were supposed to be purchased were already put out of
commission by the subsequent ban imposed by the Clean
Air Act of 1999.
“We
discovered that the government continues to pay the
loans at the expense of the public-health sector. These
incinerators are defective and were put out of
commission,” says Von Hernandez, Greenpeace Southeast
Asia campaigner said.
A 2002
case study of technology transfer, entitled “Bad
Medicine—The Austrian Medical Waste Project in the
Philippines” conducted by Greenpeace Southeast
Asia-Philippines, reported that Vamed Engineering, the
supplier, based in Vienna, Austria, is one of the
companies of the Vamed Group. Vamed AG shares are held
by Fresenius AG (77 percent), OIAG-Austrian, a
state-owned industrial group (13 percent) and Bank
Austria
(10 percent).
Bank
Austria is one of the biggest banks of Austria.
“The
fact that the bank financed a project involving a
company where it owns 10 percent of the shares raises
ethical questions and possible conflicts of interest,”
the 37-page case study noted.
EcoWaste
and FDC said the payment amounts to $2 million a year.
The
government started paying the principal of the loan only
in 2002 in the amount of US$1,069,000, or P48.8 million,
plus interest of US$256,000, or P11 million, at
4-percent annual interest rate. (US$1=P45.72).
Last
year, the government paid a total of $1,530,990, or
approximately P70 million, plus interest of $402,650, or
approximately P18.5 million.
Hernandez claimed in an earlier report that the
incinerators were substandard and did not meet the
emission levels guaranteed by the supplier.
Hernandez said the incinerators exported by Austria to
the Philippines were of such low quality that they would
never have been allowed to operate in Austria.
For his
part, FDC secretary-general Milo Tanchuling pointed out
that the incinerator loan is a classic example of an
illegitimate debt that was “incurred to finance an
ill-conceived development project that posed danger to
our environment and the people.”
Bishop
Julio Labayen joined the two coalitions in calling for
the annulment of the loans.
He vowed
to bring the campaign to cancel the incinerator debt to
Austria, as he appealed to the DOH and the DOF to
closely look into the loan agreement and seek ways to
divert the loan payments to a more environment-friendly,
nonburn medical waste-treatment technologies.
Labayen
said what makes the loan unconscionable is that the
Philippine government is practically throwing away at
the same time that it is progressively cutting back on
health outlays. |