|
MINORITY
shareholders of publicly-listed Philippine Racing Club
Inc. (PRCI) wants the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) to probe reports that the Malaysian investors in
the company may have exceeded the limits on foreign
ownership, a violation of the Constitution and rules on
corporate governance.
In a
phone interview, Brigido Dulay, a director of the Club
and spokesman for minority shareholders, cited a recent
report by the Philippine Dealing System Holdings Corp.
that the Club allegedly breached the limit on foreign
ownership since 2005 because of unregistered foreign
holdings.
The
stake of the Malaysian group in the Club, which owns and
operates the P11-billion Sta. Ana racetrack in
Makati,
is represented by the Kuala Lumpur-based Magnum Holdings
Berhad. It holds four directors’ seats in the Club. The
other major shareholders in the Club, also known as PRCI,
are the Cua family and the Sta. Lucia group of the
Robles clan.
“The SEC
should step in quickly to prevent the mockery of the
country’s constitution and the Code of Corporate
Governance. There is an urgent need for the SEC to
protect the interest of the investing public in PRCI,”
Dulay said.
The
Constitution imposes a ceiling of 40 percent for foreign
stakes in listed issues.
Apart
from the question of ownership, Dulay, who owns a
nominal share in PRCI, earlier opposed the proposal of
major shareholders to implement a property-for-shares
swap with PRCI’s majority-owned subsidiary JTH Holdings
Corp.
Together
with two other minority shareholders, Dulay secured a
temporary restraining order from a Makati Regional Trial
Court preventing PRCI’s major shareholders to vote on
the proposed property-for-shares swap.
“In the
first place, they haven’t disclosed a thing about the
plan. I am a director of the company and yet I had no
idea of what’s happening,” he said.
What the
minority shareholders are after, Dulay added, is
transparency from the major shareholders.
The
major shareholders already asked the Court of Appeals
(CA) to lift the TRO issued against them, describing
Dulay’s complaint “as a mere harassment suit.”
Through
their counsel Manalo, Puno, Jocson and Guerzon Law
Offices, the major shareholders claimed the TRO tramples
on their fundamental rights to deliberate and discuss
the planned exchange of the firm’s Makati property for
JTH shares, which was in the agenda of the Club’s annual
stockholders meeting that was supposed to have been
conducted last July 17.
“It has
always been widely known that PRCI intends to move its
race track out of Makati in order to unlock the full
potential value of its
Makati
property. The transfer of PRCI’s racing activity to its
new 71-hectare race track in Cavite has long been
expected and as early as 1996, the board of PRCI
envisaged the move out of the present Makati location,”
the lawyers said. |