|
THE
government need not resort to “fly-by-night” subsidies
that are “shallow, low-impact and unsustainable” if the
government would only follow the laws that earmark
portions of revenue from these laws and mandate their
allocation for social services.
Sen. Pia
Cayetano asserted this on Monday, hours before President
Arroyo pitched her government’s National Social Welfare
Program in her State of the Nation Address and gave an
accounting of disbursements made under the so-called
windfall profits, or Katas ng VAT program.
These
earmarks, mandated by law, but ignored for the past
three years by the economic agencies, include profits
from the reformed value-added tax (R-VAT) and the sin
taxes law, said Cayetano.
The
accounting rendered by Malacañang Palace, meanwhile, was
also pooh-poohed by independent think tank IBON, which
cited data showing only a trickle of the VAT was going
to genuinely propoor programs.
The
administration’s Katas ng VAT is a pretense to cover up
how the largest part of the VAT revenues “do not go to
social programs but rather to paying off debt,
militarism and political patronage to prop up President
Arroyo’s unprecedented unpopular rule,” said IBON.
The
government, it said, “deceitfully lumps together the
share of social services with infrastructure in R-VAT
revenues when it reports on the share going to social
programs to make these appear larger than the reality.”
The
government claims that 40 percent of R-VAT revenues in
2008 will go to “social services and infrastructure,”
but it is still unclear how much will really go to
social programs, said IBON.
For
instance, said IBON, the Department of Finance said
that, in 2006, “30 percent, or P23.5 billion [of
additional R-VAT revenues] went to social and
infrastructure expenditures.”
However,
the actual amount that went to social services was just
P8.4 billion: health programs (P2.7 billion);
resettlement and housing programs (P2 billion);
educational and training programs (P1.9 billion); hunger
mitigation programs (P1.8 billion); This means that only
11 percent of additional revenues from R-VAT went to
social programs.
In
criticizing the tack to encourage subsidies instead of
pouring in the funds into earmarked purposes as mandated
by law, Cayetano said the administration is
institutionalizing doleouts, more so with the vaunted
“national social-welfare program” that will be
supervised by a new council she created. This will be
headed by incoming Social Security System (SSS) chief
Romulo Neri.
Cayetano
reiterated her call to the President, and the
departments of Finance and of Budget and Management, to
immediately release the amounts earmarked for health,
education, environment and agriculture under Republic
Act 9334 (sin tax law) and RA 9337 (expanded value added
Tax), instead of engaging in short-term subsidy programs
such as Katas ng E-VAT.
Under
Section 7 of the sin tax law, 2.5 percent of incremental
VAT revenues should go to increasing universal coverage
under PhilHealth; and another 2.5 percent to the disease
prevention fund of the Department of Health.
Under
Section 21 (D) of the E-VAT law, the government must
allocate 50 percent of the share of local government
units from incremental revenues of E-VAT to the
following: 15 percent for education; 10 percent for the
health-insurance premiums of enrolled indigents under
PhilHealth, 15 percent for environmental conservation;
and 10 percent for agricultural modernization.
“Unlike
the current doleout programs, these earmarked funds are
clearly mandated by law and could benefit the people on
a sustained basis,” added Cayetano, who chairs the
Senate health and environment committees.
Cayetano
deplored how her repeated follow-ups with Finance
Secretary Margarito Teves and other concerned agencies
has met with silence. “It’s evident that not a single
centavo has been released under the social earmarking
provisions three years since the passage of these laws.”
IBON,
meanwhile, said the administration’s lack of concern for
social programs is even underscored by how it is not
even using the whole amount of windfall R-VAT revenues
due to high oil prices for supposedly “propoor”
programs.
Based on
the administration’s announcements on the Katas ng VAT
so far, only P9.3 billion, or just half of the estimated
P18.6 billion, in windfall RVAT revenues is going to
subsidies. This leaves another P9.3 billion unaccounted
for, inasmuch as another P2 billion in “subsidies” that
had been hyped are merely loans still to be repaid, said
the think tank. |