|
DAVAO
CITY—A softening on the stringent policy of the National
Economic and Development Authority (Neda) on accessing
foreign assistance has emboldened more local governments
to apply for more assistance for their important rural
infrastructure and livelihood projects.
At a
cost-sharing arrangement raised to 50 percent for
foreign-assisted projects, several projects and
indications of interest to apply for loans have been
filed by almost all the 425 municipalities in 27
provinces of Mindanao.
The Neda
has allowed first- and second-class municipalities to
access only 30 percent of the entire loan amount and to
put up a 70-percent counterpart. Third- and fourth-class
municipalities would only get 40 percent, with 60
percent as counterpart.
Only the
fifth- and sixth-class municipalities were allowed 50
percent of the fund, and to put up the 50-percent
counterpart.
This
policy on cost-sharing arrangement has delayed the
implementation of many rural infrastructure under the
World Bank-funded Mindanao Rural Development Program (MRDP),
already in its second phase, said Arnel de Mesa, deputy
program director.
Launched
in May last year, no projects were implemented so far,
with local governments petitioning the Neda to increase
their access to 50 percent to the World Bank fund
assistance. “There’s a lull, actually, for one year,” he
said.
He said
the MRDP 2 has already received P550 million worth of
proposals to fund several rural infrastructures, from
farm-to market roads and communal irrigation, to potable
water system and other infrastructure-related projects.
The
proposals were filed immediately as soon as the MRDP 2
was launched here, “but these were placed on hold
because of the Neda 2003 policy that placed this access
restriction on all foreign-assistance funds.
The Neda
relaxed its rules last month but only on MRDP 2 funded
projects. “We are proud to say that we are the only one
which was given that privilege, and we credit that to
the work of the mayors, the governors, even the Medco
[Mindanao Economic Development Council] for their
repeated petition and representation with the Neda,” de
Mesa said.
Shortly
after the Neda approval, the local chief executives also
indicated their interest to revive their proposals
submitted last yet that were also placed on hold, he
said.
These
indications of interest were expressed in the five
regional gatherings that MRDP 2 held in the regions in
Mindanao. It held its fifth leg at the Grand Men Seng
Hotel here Wednesday, where 27 mayors signed a
memorandum of agreement with MRDP 2 executives that
formalized the mayors’ agreement with the new
guidelines, including the 50-percent-50-percent
cost-sharing arrangement.
The MRDP
2 has a fund outlay of $83.752 million spread in five
years, up from $27 million of the first phase of the
MRDP.
The
projects are divided into two categories, the rural
infrastructure and the community fund for agricultural
development, which includes livelihood as its major
component.
“Projects should benefit the poorest of the poor,” he
said.
De Mesa
said local governments would be the ones to ascertain
and certify that the local organizations were indeed the
association of the poor, “with preference also for the
women headed households and the indigenous population.”
Of the
P550 million worth of proposals filed, the MRDP has
approved P350 million of these. “These are now into the
process of bidding them out to contractors,” de Mesa
said.
He said
that 80 percent of the project proposals were into
constructing farm-to-market roads, “which must link
agricultural production areas to the market.” Projects
under this would range from P5 million to P20 million.
Communal
irrigation also got a sizable share, averaging P25
million per project, and which could go higher at P30
million.
About
P50 million has been approved for the category of
community fund for agricultural development.
The MRDP
2 has also required local governments to form their own
municipal program management-implementation agency to
craft out the projects for MRDP 2 funding. “In many
instances in Mindanao, local governments in rural areas
have submitted their infrastructure plans for possible
funding of MRDP 2.” |