|
WHEN the
Mazda 3 was first introduced locally three years ago, it
was a sales hit due to its revolutionary exterior
design. But the competition has caught up significantly,
propping Mazda to launch an upgraded version in June.
But does it have enough on all fronts to make customers
look past the Honda Civic, the Toyota Corolla and even
its Ford Focus cousin?
The test
unit (a base model 1.6L S) shows very little has changed
in the overall design from the original C1 platform
shared by both the current Focus and the current Volvo
S40. However, there are a few subtle yet nifty changes
to the outside, such as new front and rear bumpers,
taillights “borrowed” from the previous model 2.0-liter,
a single-slat grille inspired by that of the previous
model 2.0-liter, and a more pronounced ridge atop the
rear bumper for easier access to the trunk lid.
Little
has also changed in the interior. The predominantly
black interior colorway, the upscale overall design and
layout (with a uniquely “Euro” presence) and smattering
of metallic trim are retained, resulting in a nice look,
but lacking in panache. Also retained is the 60/40 split
(not flush) rear seat, glove box, four cup holders in
front (two in the doors, two in front of the center
console) and the two cup holders in the rear doors. The
instrumentation cluster still gets the layout and chrome
trim of the previous model, but totes a white-on-red
look that displays a cool blue light during night
driving. To be honest, it’s a great upgrade, but it
would have been better if Mazda had stuck to the
previous model’s black-on-red dashboard gauge look.

Two
major interior enhancements are the seating and the
audio entertainment. The former now totes full cloth on
both the seats and the door linings, which dissipate
heat much faster than the leather-cloth combo of the
previous model. Unfortunately, the rear seats still feel
a bit hard on the lumbar area, but give great lateral
room for two. On the other hand, the MP3-ready sound
system is much improved. Gone is the tinny sound in
favor of better tonal clarity, but treble replication
was found wanting. The steering wheel audio controls on
the nine o’clock side position were retained—a big plus
in helping the driver concentrate more on what’s ahead.
On
the road, the “3” is a big disappointment. Powerband entry is high (2,750 to
3,000 rpm onward). The automatic four forward gear setup
is retained, and tends to downshift at inopportune
times, such as on the apex of crests. Using the manual
mode is not much help either, as a really short second
gear and a very tall third gear make emergency lane
changes ingratiating. Top speed is typical of an inline
four cylinder (181 kph), but the 8-km-per-liter
consumption rate registered on four days of mixed
driving is a bit of an improvement from the old Mazda 3.
Handling
is improved, but not by much despite the 3’s suspension
component additions (an improved MacPherson front setup
and an E-type multilink rear setup), no thanks to the
awful grip from the OE tires (Goodyear Eagle NCT 5s).
Steering is heavy but manageable, but braking ability is
excellent, the side mirrors are large, the headlights
now tote high-intensity discharge units (a big plus)
that turn on in tandem with the fog lights and the ride
is firm. However, the handbrake position was still
retained from the old model (near the passenger side),
which can be intrusive to your shotgun passenger.
Two
complaints about the previous Mazda 3 were the archaic,
door handle receptacle-incorporated power locks and the
nauseating smell from the aircon during the first 30
seconds of use. With the 2008 model, the former is still
retained. On the other hand, the aircon no longer makes
occupants dizzy and provides more than ample blasts of
cold air.
Despite
its quirks, the Mazda 3 can still be considered a
top-line option in a primarily looks-driven market. But
for the unit’s sales to rival that of the Civic and the
Corolla, serious engine, transmission, handling (and
perhaps interior styling) upgrades must be addressed. |