HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    Review ICTSI contract to
    cut shipping costs–PCCI
    By VG Cabuag
    Reporter

    IF the government intends to cut shipping costs in the country, it should review the Manila contract of the International Container Terminal Services Inc. (ICTSI), the Philippines’ largest port operator.

    Donald Dee, chairman of the country’s largest business association, said that the review is needed since the Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) relies heavily on the concession fees being remitted by the publicly-listed ICTSI from its operation of the Manila International Container Terminal (MICT). The facility, the Philippines’ biggest, handles an average of 1.2 million 20-foot containers annually.

    According to Dee, chairman of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI), reliance on ICTSI’s fee payments creates a lopsided revenue base for the port agency. Besides failing to create or support competition, especially at the Port of Manila, Dee said that the agency ends up subsidizing other smaller facilities.

    The port operator, controlled by the Razon family, remits an estimated P2 billion yearly to the port agency for the use of the MICT. The amount is 40 percent of the PPA’s entire revenue stream. Meanwhile, Asian Terminals Inc. (ATI), which runs the Manila South Harbor, pays less than half of ICTSI’s fees.

    “The [ICTSI] contract should be reviewed. It should be prorated on capacity based on per container so that port operators could compete for the cargo to lower cost,” Dee said. “All operators should be given the same opportunities to level the playing field. If not, then the cost would not go down.”

    Dee also warned that the lopsided revenue stream scenario will once more be played out once the PPA becomes successful in privatizing the Manila North Harbor under its proposed single operator scheme.

    Under the arrangement, market forces will be unable to dictate rates since it will be set the winning operator, Dee said.

    However, when managed by various companies, not only will the government’s collect different revenues from operators, the companies themselves will compete for cargo, thereby cutting rates.

    Earlier, PPA officials explained that giving the captive market to an operator was its main strategy to entice more bidders and players in an arena where only few players are interested. This then could give the private operator an opportunity to recoup its investments.

    Under current arrangements, all containers are processed at the MICT. Although the South Harbor facilitates the transport of all non-containerized cargo, it is allowed to handle some containers which the MICT may be unable to process.

    On the other hand, the Harbour Port Centre Terminal Inc. is only permitted to handle bulk cargo of its customers. Although it has long sought government approval to handle containers, the PPA has never allowed the operator, closely-held by businessman Reghis Romero II, to process metal boxes.

    OTHER STORIES
    Review ICTSI contract to cut shipping costs–PCCI

    IF the government intends to cut shipping costs in the country, it should review the Manila contract of the International Container Terminal Services Inc. (ICTSI), the Philippines’ largest port operator.

    read more

    US Navy looks the other way in the Gulf

    DUBAI—Sailors with skin baked to leather by the Persian Gulf sun stack Hewlett-Packard Co. laser-jet printers alongside a 40-foot wooden dhow in Dubai Creek as Ali Reza, an Iranian merchant, watches them sweat.

    read more