|
A
company finds great success with a product or service.
Makes loads of cash. Builds a seemingly strong brand.
Settles in to a satisfying position of dominance. A
couple of years pass and then, out of nowhere, a new
player swoops in and gobbles up most of the customers,
leaving little but scraps for the once dominant firm.
Why does
this happen? Most such failure can be traced to the
hubris that often accompanies great business success,
says Tuck School of Business professor Sydney
Finkelstein. Dominating a market can cause
close-mindedness. Rigor mortis sets in, and the company
stops doing all those things — like responding to
customers and out-innovating the competition — that made
it successful in the first place.
Finkelstein calls it “The Zombie Syndrome.” To avoid
this predicament, leaders
need to
dedicate themselves to a continual reassessment of their
market position.
And to
keep company policies intended to promote high
performance from hardening into feelings of
invulnerability, it helps to adopt what Harvard Business
School professor Amy. C. Edmondson describes as a
learning frame: casting new challenges or situations as
opportunities to learn from outsiders.
Make
sure key executives are given responsibility for a few
individual customer relationships. “By baking customer
needs and preferences into key decision-making
processes, this tactic helps ensure that the company
never creates new offerings simply for the sake of
creation,” writes Finkelstein.
***
Perfectionism can fuel the zombie syndrome. Companies
may aim for “high standards in every operation without
stopping to ask if these standards are appropriate,”
Finkelstein holds. During the 1980s, Barney’s clothing
store brought
in
European craftsmen to lay Italian marble mosaics in the
Madison Avenue location—despite the fact that such
lavish appointments were no longer translating into
higher sales volume. By the 1980s at IBM, a long track
record of success in the pursuit of perfection had led
the company to stop comparing itself to competitors and
to rely instead on internal measures.
To
protect against the ravages of excessive perfectionism,
“when an old goal is being met, don’t just raise the
bar, change the goal—this will help prevent you from
focusing obsessively on standards that are becoming
increasingly irrelevant,”
Finkelstein says. External benchmarks for routine
operations and centralized support services will also
help.
***
That
doesn’t mean companies shouldn’t be committed to
perfection or to the organization’s vision, Finkelstein
says: Those norms help foster high achievement. The
trick is to recast them so that they don’t promote
insularity.
Edmondson suggests distinguishing between learning
frames and performance frames. A project viewed through
a learning frame has three characteristics: It’s seen as
aspirational—an opportunity to help team members
accomplish compelling goals for themselves and their
stakeholders.
The
leader emphasizes her dependence on the help and input
of other team members. And the other team members see
themselves as essential partners.
By
contrast, when a project is viewed through a performance
frame, it’s seen as defensive — a necessary requirement
for keeping up with the competition.
The more
that you as a group leader can recast commitments to
perfection or to the company’s vision as motivators, not
burdens, the less likely your unit will succumb to the
zombie syndrome. Seen through the learning frame, those
ideals provide compelling reasons to treat each new
challenge as an exciting opportunity, with outsiders —
customers, partners and even competitors — providing
vital pieces of the puzzle. Then the team is much more
in tune with the realities of the market
*****
Online
lessons for offline copy
By Suzan St. Maur
The
early days of reading on the Web were painful ones:
squinting at fat, gray chunks of verbiage obviously
lifted wholesale from dense, dry corporate brochures.
Happily, times have changed, and Web copy has greatly
improved — so much so, in fact, that the principles that
make for good Web copy can profitably be applied to
print:
§
Have
clear objectives. To be taken seriously, organize your
thoughts into lucid, understandable points.
§
Create
text that can be scanned. Highlight and organize text so
readers can quickly get its gist.
§
Generate
copy that can be read out of sequence. We don’t expect
people to read Web site content in sequence, but forget
that people often peruse offline print in nonlinear
fashion as well — for instance, glancing through
brochures in no particular order.
§
Separate
out technical information. Web sites often place
technical details off on the side of the screen or on
another page entirely, so they don’t obscure main
marketing points. Offline messages gain a similar
clarity when you box off or append technical data.
§
Remove
visual clutter. Just as people loathe Web sites that
bristle with headlines and graphics, they also hate
cluttered print ads. If your message is hard to discern
— online or offline — readers will just click or flip
over to your competitors’ information.
§
Get to
the point. Online copy needs to be economical and
uncomplicated. Short sentences and paragraphs work best.
And that’s a sound approach to enlivening your print
communications, too.
****
Build
rapport before the negotiation starts
By Susan G. Parker
If
you’re likely to be on the receiving end of difficult
tactics, work to build rapport before you sit down to
negotiate. People are more inclined to help people they
like, says negotiation consultant Eric C. Gould.
Adam
Levy was a Silicon Valley attorney who was anxious to
get out of his law firm and work for a high-tech
startup. He set his sights on DigitalThink, a San
Francisco firm that he was providing legal service to.
The
problem? The people at Digital Think hated lawyers. They
could not imagine bringing one in-house.
Levy
figured that the key to getting hired was to persuade
the CEO, who was relatively new in his position and was
still getting used to the fact that he had
authority to hire people.
“My
focus was to make him laugh and smile,” Levy says. “We
would get together
for
breakfast and lunch. We would commiserate about what was
going on in
business
and talk about golf and sports.”
While
building the personal relationship, Levy also made the
business case about why it would be less expensive to
hire an in-house counsel. To answer the
CEO’s
distaste for lawyers, Levy pointed out that it was
better to deal with one lawyer than several. Levy’s
persistence paid off, and he was hired.
****
Balancing styles of team members
By Loren Gary
One of a
manager’s most important tasks is balancing the
optimistic and pessimistic tendencies in a group, says
University of Pennsylvania psychologist Martin Seligman.
“Generally, there’s a division of labor that makes for
sound functioning. Optimists tend to do best in jobs
that call for high vision and initiative — for example,
the sales, planning and marketing functions. The
financial, safety and risk-assessment people are the
pessimists.”
To the
extent that you can, try to match a person’s style with
job responsibilities that take advantage of it. And use
your knowledge of each member’s style to help you
evaluate his recommendation about new ventures under
consideration. When, for example, the typically gung-ho
member of your group is very wary about launching a new
product, that’s a sign worth paying special attention
to. |