HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    Citigroup gets cleared in Australia

    SYDNEY—Citigroup Inc., the world’s biggest bank, was cleared in Australia’s first prosecution of a company for insider trading.

    The Federal Court in Sydney dismissed a claim by regulators, who said the bank breached a duty to a client and was guilty of insider trading by telling an employee during a cigarette break to stop buying shares in Patrick Corp., a port-cargo handler. At the time, Citigroup was advising Toll Holdings Ltd., the nation’s biggest freight company, on a hostile bid for Patrick.

    The trial was the first test of an Australian law governing how securities firms manage conflicts between trading securities on their own account and advising investment banking clients. The lawsuit, filed by the nation’s securities watchdog, said Citigroup failed to keep market-moving information known by its investment bankers away from traders who could profit from it.

    “There is no question this is a bad result for the regulator,’’ Justin O’Brien, professor of corporate governance at the Australian National University, said in an interview. “It took a morally strong, but legally weak, case.’’

    Judge Peter Jacobson ruled that “the claims failed at the outset’’ because Toll’s contract with Citigroup specifically excluded any fiduciary relationship.

    “It allows the investment banking industry to proceed confidently in providing advisory services to corporate clients,’’ Duncan Fairweather, executive director of the Australian Financial Markets Association, said in an interview. “Regulators in the US and UK, and global investment banks, have been following this case.’’ Citigroup said in a statement it welcomed the ruling.

    The case stemmed from trades made by a Citigroup worker on  August 19, 2005, the last business day before Melbourne-based Toll made a A$5.2 billion ($4.4 billion) bid for Patrick.

    A breach in Citigroup’s Chinese wall was alleged to have occurred when Paul Darwell, head of equity derivatives, met with trader Andrew Manchee outside the firm’s Sydney office for a cigarette break and told him to stop buying Patrick shares.

    Manchee, who then sold 192,353 Patrick shares, had bought more than 1 million earlier in the day. His trades triggered a probe into whether he knew Citigroup was advising Toll on its bid for Patrick, whose shares surged 13 percent on August 19.

    Judge Jacobson ruled Wednesday that Manchee didn’t make “the supposition’’ that Citigroup was advising Toll on a bid for Patrick. He also said in his judgment the bank had in place Chinese walls “which insulated’’ Manchee from this information.

    “The conflict of interest and duty claims were misconceived and the facts didn’t support the insider-trading claims,’’ said Paul Meadows, a lawyer at Allens Arthur Robinson in Melbourne.

    The Australian Securities & Investments Commission said in a statement it will assess the implications of the case and hasn’t decided whether to appeal.

    The regulator had sought a fine of as much as A$1 million and orders for Citigroup to keep price-sensitive information on deals away from its proprietary traders.

    “The case had the potential to set legal precedent about whether Chinese walls are an effective way of managing potential conflicts of interest,’’ Fairweather said.

    Citigroup Chief Executive Officer Charles Prince has overhauled internal controls in the past four years to limit chances of the firm becoming embroiled in financial scandals.

    Citigroup was forced to pay $4.7 billion in the past three-and-a-half years after being accused of helping to bankrupt Enron Corp. and aiding WorldCom Inc. in defrauding shareholders. The bank has also settled claims that its research was biased and that it misappropriated mutual fund fees. Citigroup shut its private bank in Japan in 2004 amid money laundering charges.

    The bank denied any wrongdoing in the Australian trial and none of its employees were defendants. The insider trading case was Australia’s first against a company, rather than individuals. The case in Sydney was Australian Securities & Investments Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty. No. NSD 651 of 2006. --Bloomberg

    OTHER STORIES
    International shippers dispute World Bank report

    A WORLD Bank report which indicated that the Philippines has the highest trading cost in Asia is “grossly unfair and misleading,” according to a group of foreign shipping companies serving the nation’s trade route.

    read more

    Citigroup gets cleared in Australia

    SYDNEY—Citigroup Inc., the world’s biggest bank, was cleared in Australia’s first prosecution of a company for insider trading.

    read more

    Indian power producer mulls acquisition of vessels

    SINGAPORE—Tata Power Co., India’s third-biggest utility, said it may buy vessels or stakes in shipping companies to transport coal from Indonesia, after acquiring shares of two mines in the Southeast Asian nation.

    read more