HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    International shippers dispute World Bank report
     
    By Robert JA Basilio Jr.
    Section Editor

    A WORLD Bank report which indicated that the Philippines has the highest trading cost in Asia is “grossly unfair and misleading,” according to a group of foreign shipping companies serving the nation’s trade route.

    In a statement, the Association of International Shipping Lines (AISL) said that the World Bank study “needs to be reexamined,” asserting that a large part of the fees collected by international operators “do not actually go to the lines.”

    The World Bank report said that shipping costs in the Philippines are expensive because of the high- fees charged by foreign shipping operators. It said that expenses related to processing twenty-foot metal containers were at $1,336 in the Philippines, $335 in China, $382 in Singapore and $848 in Thailand.

    “The domestic transshipment cost of $500, considered as the most expensive component of the port and terminal handling costs which total $994 cannot be considered as a charge by foreign lines,” the AISL said in a statement.

    Since non-Filipino carriers are disallowed from transporting goods between two domestic ports, foreign liners not only have to contract the services of local companies for the trip’s domestic voyage, they also pay for freight expenses and other incidental charges.

    “The $500 paid by shippers to the foreign lines is simply a cost recovery and the latter do not gain any benefit from it,” the group said, adding that the World Bank’s estimates on Thailand, Singapore and China failed to consider expenses involved in transporting the goods from one Philippine port to another. “Deducting the domestic transshipment cost of $500 from the World Bank figure of $1,336, total trading cost in the Philippines will be $836, compared to Thailand’s $848.”

    The same statement also said various factors should also be considered in making shipping cost estimates between Manila and the rest of the world.

    Besides saying that Philippine shippers need to compete for space on foreign vessels and therefore have to pay market rates, the group said that based on a March 2007 survey, “the rate for a 40-foot container from Manila and Cebu to Japan is lower compared to Bangkok, Singapore and Jakarta.

    It added that shipping line tariffs are influenced by port tariffs, which are regulated by the government.

    “Foreign lines cannot simply absorb these increases but have to pass it on to importers/exporters,” the group said.

    OTHER STORIES
    International shippers dispute World Bank report

    A WORLD Bank report which indicated that the Philippines has the highest trading cost in Asia is “grossly unfair and misleading,” according to a group of foreign shipping companies serving the nation’s trade route.

    read more

    Citigroup gets cleared in Australia

    SYDNEY—Citigroup Inc., the world’s biggest bank, was cleared in Australia’s first prosecution of a company for insider trading.

    read more

    Indian power producer mulls acquisition of vessels

    SINGAPORE—Tata Power Co., India’s third-biggest utility, said it may buy vessels or stakes in shipping companies to transport coal from Indonesia, after acquiring shares of two mines in the Southeast Asian nation.

    read more