HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    US automakers propose to alter

    Senate bill seen as too harsh

     

    WASHINGTON—Automakers ranging from Ford Motor Co. to Toyota Motors Corp. called a Senate bill to boost average mileage standards 40 percent by 2020 too harsh and pledged to push for changes.

    “This vote is the first step in the legislative process, and major changes are still needed to make this bill achievable,’’ Ford’s Bruce Andrews, vice president for government relations at the No. 2 US automaker, said in a statement.

    The Senate vote late last week is the first to raise auto-efficiency rules in 16 years.

    Most automakers said the combined mileage standard is too strict because of the costs needed to improve the fuel-efficiency of light trucks, which is typically lower than that of cars.

    The Senate bill would erase a three-decade distinction between vehicle types and require all autos to average 35 miles per gallon (mpg) of fuel. General Motors Corp. vice chairman Bob Lutz and Chrysler’s CEO Tom LaSorda have said meeting the 35 mpg goal will cost their companies more than $6,000 per vehicle.

    Having failed to prevail in the Senate, automakers are looking to Rep. John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, to help them win against environmental groups and achieve a lower mileage target. Dingell heads the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which is scheduled to consider a broad energy and alternative-fuel package before July 4.

    Dan Becker, director of the global warming program at the Sierra Club in Washington, predicted lawmakers will stand up to Dingell, whose Michigan district includes Ford’s Dearborn base.

    “I think the automakers have lost credibility,’’ he said. Becker and other environmental advocates support the Senate measure.

    Even Japan’s Honda Motor Co. and Toyota Motors Corp., makers of the most fuel-efficient car fleets in the US, called the Senate goal ambitious. The standard is now 27.5 mpg for cars and 21.6 mpg for light trucks.

    The “35-mpg standard is very aggressive,’’ Edward Cohen, vice president for government relations at Honda North America in Washington, said in an interview. “It’s not a business-as-usual standard.’’

    In an e-mailed statement, Josephine Cooper, Toyota’s head of government affairs, also called the target “very aggressive.’’

    The Senate bill requires the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to set mileage standards based on vehicle size, which means each automaker could have a different goal and “Toyota’s target would likely be higher than 35 mpg and would be extremely challenging,’’ she said.

    Automakers including Ford, Toyota, GM and DaimlerChrysler AG’s Chrysler Group want a standard that would combine the mileage of cars and light trucks.

    Dave McCurdy, president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said in a statement that the group would work with lawmakers to “develop reasonable fuel economy standards that are affordable.’’ The Washington trade group represents nine automakers including GM, Ford and Toyota.

    Automakers “are going to have to spend heavily in terms of fuel-efficient cars that meet consumer demands,’’ Dennis Virag,  president of Automotive Consulting Group in Ann Arbor, Michigan, said in an interview.

    The bill also would allow automakers to count vehicles fueled by hydrogen, electricity and hybrid power toward a mandate that 50 percent of all vehicles sold in the US by 2015 be powered by sources other than gasoline.

    Detroit-area automakers Ford, GM and Chrysler want only vehicles powered by an ethanol blend known as E85 to count toward the alternative-fuel requirement.

    Nissan Motor Co., which campaigned to expand the definition of alternative fuel, welcomed the change.

    “We’re pleased our voices were heard in regards to flex-fuel’’ vehicles, Jeannine Ginivan, spokesman for the Tokyo-based company in Washington said, calling it “technology neutral.’’

    Before the Senate bill becomes law, the House of Representatives must pass matching legislation, and the president must sign a measure agreed to by both chambers.

    Shares of GM fell 50 cents to $35.46 at 4:20 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Ford’s shares gained 22 cents to $9.13. American depositary receipts of Toyota fell $1.97 to $123.02, Honda’s dropped 39 cents to $35.22, and Nissan’s were down 45 cents to $21.21. --Bloomberg

    OTHER STORIES

    Clean energy proposal includes dirty fuel use

    A CLEAN energy plan funded by one of the world’s largest banks still allows the use of coal, the dirtiest fuel known to humankind. When burned to produce energy, coal also emits toxic chemicals harmful to the environment and dangerous to human health.

    read more

    Green groups support breast-milk promotion

    ENVIRONMENTALISTS threw their support behind the shared effort of the government and the civil society to promote and protect breastmilk, the most healthy and ecologically sound food for babies.

    read more

    US automakers propose to alter Senate bill seen as too harsh

    WASHINGTON—Automakers ranging from Ford Motor Co. to Toyota Motors Corp. called a Senate bill to boost average mileage standards 40 percent by 2020 too harsh and pledged to push for changes.

    read more

    Natural gas still more expensive than coal

    SYDNEY—Australia needs a price of at least A$25 ($21.22) a metric ton on carbon to drive a switch to natural gas-fired power generation from coal, which supplies 85 percent of the nation’s electricity, an industry consulting firm said.

    read more