|
THE
Philippine government is still tied to several serious
concerns on the proposed Partnership Cooperation
Agreement (PCA) by the European Union (EU), and Manila
“could be subjected to possible cross retaliation” that
includes withdrawal of trade preferences if there is
failure on three essential EU values on human rights,
rule of law and democracy.
An
official of the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said
the interagency committee to study the proposed PCA of
the EU sticks to its original position in 2005,
stressing the need to clarify issues with the EU on PCA
provisions.
The PCA
seeks broader cooperation of the EU and the Philippines
on the fight against terrorism, promotion of human
rights and the rule of law, legal migration for
Filipinos in EU member-states and good governance.
The
proposed PCA also includes the need for Asean countries
to ratify the 1995 Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court (ICC), on which the Philippine military
and police have aired serious apprehension due to
possible harassment suits from human-rights
organizations.
Asean
members must first sign a bilateral agreement with the
EU before they could qualify in the comprehensive free
trade agreement (FTA) that seeks to facilitate trade and
investments in the world’s two largest and influential
regional blocs.
The
Philippines is hosting the fifth Joint Committee Meeting
(JCM) for the EU-Asean proposed free-trade deal from
June 25 to 27 at the Dusit Hotel in Makati, seeking to
explore areas of cooperation for the free-trade deal.
The three-day meeting will include exchanges on the
liberalization of sectors in transportation, services
and professions. The last JCM held in Bangkok tackled
liberalization in banking and telecommunications in the
two regional blocs.
“The PCA
as a bilateral agreement on cooperation on human rights
should not be preconditioned on the free-trade agreement
being negotiated between the EU and Asean,” said a
senior diplomat, who requested anonymity, pending the
government’s official submission of its response to the
proposed PCA.
“They
[referring to the EU] want those three essential values
[human rights, rule of law and democracy] to be followed
and the Philippines could be subjected to
cross-retaliation like... they can withdraw trade
preferences [under the EU-Asean FTA] if there is failure
on those three essential values,” said the DFA official.
He said
the proposed EU bilateral agreement specified a certain
level of compliance for the Philippines.
“When
you read the text, it clearly states that everything is
mandatory, binding and demands commitments from the
Philippines, so it leaves us open to possible
retaliation if we fail on those aspects.”
The DFA
official, meanwhile, said that the Philippines is not
rushing to conclude a partnership-cooperation agreement
with the EU, saying the proposal “has to be revisited”
before the government could come up with “a very precise
and clear position.”
“We will
inform the EU on these areas where we will have
difficulty [in making commitments],” he said.
He said
the position is expected to be finished before the Asia
Europe Meeting (Asem) Summit to be held in Europe in
October.
Ambassador Alistair Macdonald, head of the Delegation of
the European Commission to the Philippines, earlier said
that Asean countries like Indonesia, Thailand and
Vietnam are now in the final stages of negotiations for
their respective PCAs with EU.
He said
the worst-case scenario is that the Philippines will not
be able to take part in the FTA between the EU and Asean.
Asean
groups the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia,
Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Burma/Myanmar, Brunei and
Vietnam.
The EU,
on the other hand, is a regional bloc composed of 27
economies that include developed countries like France,
the Italy, Germany, Spain, Belgium, United Kingdom, the
Netherlands and Sweden. |