|
What
subplots are at play in the rush to the “phased” opening
of Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia 3) next
month, when the concerns that the two structural
engineers the Manila International Airport Authority (Miaa)
hired to have a look-see at the mothballed terminal have
not yet been satisfactorily addressed? The two foreign
consultants, Ove Arup and TGCI Engineers, have earlier
found out the structural defects in the Naia 3 that were
uncovered following the collapse of a ceiling because of
the vibrations of the air-conditioning unit.
And to
think that veteran airport reporter Recto Mercene wrote
late last year about the warning aired by the structural
engineers that the Naia 3 terminal faces the prospects
of collapse should an intensity-6 earthquake rock the
building. The fact that it is probable that such a
strong earthquake could hit the place should be reason
enough for the authorities not to rush the partial
opening of the mothballed building. Prudence dictates
that the structural defects be corrected first before
the traveling public is exposed to such hazards.
First
off, the government should first assure the public that
the findings of Ove Arup and TGCI have been properly
addressed before any partial opening is made. The fact
that there has been no such assurance means that there
is something amiss. On matters of safety, especially in
the field of aviation, the government cannot afford to
have a public-relations disaster, lest its tourism
efforts suffer.
Should
any of the parts of the building cave in after the
partial opening, the country’s image abroad could be
affected. Not only that, even the aggressive wooing for
tourists would suffer inconsiderably. Thus, it is but
prudent for the Miaa to seriously consider the safety
factors of the Naia 3 before it allows the traveling
public to use the facility even on a partial basis. The
confirmed structural defects in the Naia 3 remain
unaddressed.
While
there were news reports that the Miaa had ordered the
repair of the terminal, no certification of structural
soundness, much less any official report on the
structural integrity of the building, has been issued so
far to ensure the safety of the passengers, employees
and aircraft. Why the rash judgment on the partial
opening of the still-to-be-certified-as-sound terminal?
Why the rush? And to think that the government has been
sounding off about the opening of the terminal and then
delaying the same due to a collapsed ceiling and
findings of structural defects, among other things.
In March
last year, TGCI Engineers Inc. and Ove Arup & Partners
HK Ltd. recommended to the Miaa the postponement of the
scheduled opening of the terminal due to findings of
structural flaws. With the recent intensity-6 earthquake
in China, the government can ill-afford such catastrophe
to hit. It must be noted here that it was the Miaa that
contracted the engineering firms to conduct structural
evaluation of the building shortly after a big portion
of the ceiling fell off following the government
takeover of the terminal from the Philippine
International Air Transport Corp. (Piatco).
The
findings and corresponding recommendations of the
engineering firms confirmed the assertions made earlier
by internationally recognized experts on fraud, aviation
and construction, who testified for the Philippines
before the International Center for Settlement of
Investment Disputes (ICSID), saying the terminal was
defective and substandard. In its legal filing, the
Philippine legal panel submitted the statement of
aviation and construction expert Richard Klenk to the
Washington-based ICSID revealing structural defects of
the Naia 3 due to the use of inferior materials and poor
building methods.
Malaysian donates prize
Amid the
economic crisis in the region, it is heartwarming to
know that a Malaysian architect, who won a design
contest of a joint government-private sector partnership
seeking to come up with typhoon-resistant school
buildings all over the country, has seen fit to donate
the prize money of $10,000 during Monday night’s
ceremonies at the New World Renaissance Hotel in Makati.
The Malaysian, Eleena Jamil, opted for donating the cash
prize to the government’s school-building program.
The
typhoon-resistant school-building design features an
all-concrete structure—from the roof down—in what the
government believes is the answer to the problem of
toppled school buildings and roofless schools after the
exit of powerful typhoons. The National Disaster
Coordinating Council, the Department of Education and
Holcim have joined together in setting up the design
contest for future school buildings. We understand that
the construction of calamity-resistant school buildings
would serve another purpose: that of evacuation spots in
the event of calamities that strike any part of the
country.
Holcim,
a global cement giant from Switzerland, has made it its
commitment to help in the country’s setting up of
calamity-resistant school buildings as part of its
corporate social responsibility, or CSR. This is a new
corporate buzzword among corporate citizens as part of
what has been dubbed as a new paradigm for companies:
attendant social responsibility. CSR accounts for the
awakened citizenry on the problems of global warming,
alternative energy sources and poverty-alleviation
efforts.
About
200 masons who completed the company’s Galing Mason
Program are being marshaled to build the school
prototype. The masonry program is a joint project of the
company with the Technical Education and Skills
Development Authority and which is a seven-day training
program for interested workers who want to be certified
in masonry work. The prototype school building will be
built in Nato, Sangay, Camarines Sur, a place often
ravaged by typhoons. This government-private sector
partnership should be replicated in other areas of
concern, such as the alleviation of poverty, considered
the reason for the surge in crimes, terrorism and other
violent acts.
E-mail: hugagni@yahoo.com |