HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    Of jeepneys, fare increases and fuel prices

    I am no fan of the jeepney, that supposed Filipino icon and example of Filipino engineering and ingenuity which has been the principal mode of mass transport in our country.

    I personally believe that the jeepney is not a sustainable form of mass transport. They can only carry 16 to 18 passengers at any one time. They have mostly secondhand diesel engines which spew endless toxic fumes into the environment. They clog the roads with their presence, stopping and going at will, traffic rules and road decency be damned. Some jeepney drivers excuse their brazen driving behavior by saying “they are just trying to earn a living.” Given that logic, everybody else driving to and from work can also drive rudely, because, heck, they are just trying to earn a living also.

    What I do understand, however, is that a lot of families depend on the earnings that their principal breadwinner, the jeepney driver, generates. And after much hemming and hawing, the government, through the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB), finally granted the request of the jeepney and bus operators and drivers for a much-needed fare increase. They have cited the escalating price of gasoline and other fuel-based products as the principal reason for their requested fare increase.

    In Metro Manila, the jeepney drivers were allowed a fare increase of P0.50 for the first four kilometers; while regular buses, P1 for the first five kilometers; and air-conditioned buses, P1.50 for the first five kilometers. No increase on the rates for every succeeding kilometer for both Metro Manila jeepneys and buses was given, however. The jeepney drivers and operators were actually asking for a P1.50 increase, which the LTFRB will continue to hold hearings on.

    Why is the fare increase such a contentious issue? Simply because it will impact on the millions of the commuting public in the metropolis that rely on jeepneys and buses to move them around. Many are students as well as minimum-wagers who, given the distance from their homes to their offices, have take-home pays which can only take them home, or worse, cannot even take them home!

    Which takes us to the ever-increasing prices of fuel and fuel-based products, which I personally do not monitor anymore due to their incessant nature. The oil companies increase their prices at will since they are influenced by the movements of the fuel prices in the world market. There is such a high demand for fossil fuel to run almost everything for the modern person’s creature comforts and needs. Given the dwindling supply of this nonrenewable resource, it is understandable why the prices are escalating at a dizzying pace.

    Do check the bottom line, however, of local oil companies, and, most likely, most of them are operating profitably with healthy margins. That is expected, since they can always adjust their prices (no hearings, no wage boards, no consultations) and pass them on to the hapless businesses and consumers. And every time fuel prices increase, they create a multiplier impact on everything else.

    And there lies the irony that a P0.50 fare increase for the jeepney and bus operators and drivers have to go through hearings and consultations because of their impact on the riding public. Most drivers live on hand-to-mouth existence and are not able to adequately provide for the needs of their families. Contrast that to the cushy margins that oil companies generate, and you will have an idea about the imperfections of price adjustments of certain items in the marketplace.

    It is good that certain fuel subsidies are offered the drivers, as well as some subsidies from the National Food Authority are being planned for the purchase of rice. The drivers will also benefit from the planned exemption from income tax for those under the minimum-wage level, which most drivers are. But still, the regulating body should exhibit more sensitivity to and compassion for the needs of this marginalized sector, maybe as much, if not more, than the market-forces understanding and tolerance they extend to the oil companies.

    And, while at it, revisit the large-scale use of moving people through the jeepney and craft certain directions to move to more efficient modes of transport. We are the only country in the Asean which employs this contraption as a form of mass transport, and it hampers efficiency and effectivity of movement. Of course, we will have to find ways to train jeepney drivers to acquire other value-adding skills to make them more productive and competitive in the work market.

    ****

    The author teaches at the Ramon V. del Rosario Sr. Graduate School of Business, College of Business and Economics, De La Salle University-Manila. He welcomes comments at swatchdlb@yahoo.com.

    OTHER STORIES
    Editorial: Prayers for Ces and Jimmy

    As this was being written, the noon deadline for the payment of ransom by the kidnappers of Ces Drilon and Jimmy Encarnacion lapsed. Word on the fate of the ABS-CBN TV reporter and her cameraman has yet to filter out of the bandits’ lair in Sulu. Like the rest of the media community, the owners and staff of this paper offer their prayers for the safe release of Drilon and Encarnacion—just like the third member of the team, assistant cameraman Angelo Valderama, who was freed earlier.

    read more

    Mirror Image: Of jeepneys, fare increases and fuel prices

    I am no fan of the jeepney, that supposed Filipino icon and example of Filipino engineering and ingenuity which has been the principal mode of mass transport in our country.

    read more

    Dispatches from the Enchanted Kingdom: The Three Stooges

    The Joint Foreign Chambers (JFC) was correct to ignore the Senate and write directly to Mrs. Gloria Arroyo. She is, after all, the only person to talk to about any pending legislation, unless, by some miracle, this present Congress grows balls.

    read more

    The View from the 19th Floor: Mutual respect

    Let me start by stating that despite what happened during the Energy Committee hearing at the Senate, we at the Joint Foreign Chambers (JFC) will not be discouraged from pursuing our efforts to foster closer ties between the Philippines and our respective countries.

    read more

    Market Files: Naia 3 structural defects

    What subplots are at play in the rush to the “phased” opening of Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia 3) next month, when the concerns that the two structural engineers the Manila International Airport Authority (Miaa) hired to have a look-see at the mothballed terminal have not yet been satisfactorily addressed?

    read more

    Andy Mukherjee: Hang around 73 years for final check from India

    Markus Rosgen, a Citigroup Inc. equity strategist in Hong Kong, has turned the commonly used metric of dividend yield on its head with interesting results.

    read more