HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    Election of key Stradec execs invalid, says SC
    By Joel San Juan
    Reporter

    KEY officers of Strategic Alliance Development Corp. (Stradec)—chairman Cezar Quiambao, members of the board Anthony Quiambao and Simplicio Quiambao Jr., corporate secretary Eric Pilapil and assistant corporate secretary Albert Rasalan—are to be removed from their posts.

    The Supreme Court has found their election invalid, but confirmed the election of petitioners Alderito Yujuico as chairman and president, and Bonifacio Sumbilla and Dolney Sumbilla as board members along with Cezar Quiambao, Jose M. Magno and Ma. Christina Ferreros in the annual stockholders’ meeting in March 1, 2004, in its Pasig City offices.

    First Division chairman Chief Justice Reynato Puno, Associate Justices Renato Corona, Adolfo Azcuna and Cancio Garcia concurred.

    Stradec is a domestic corporation engaged in providing financial and investment advisory services, and in investing in projects through consortia or joint ventures.

    In the decision penned by Associate Justice Angelina Sandoval-Gutierrez, the First Division set aside the November 25, 2004, decision of Judge Meliton Esmulan of the Regional Trial Court in Urdaneta City allowing a special stockholders’ meeting and election of Stradec’s new set of officers for the term 2004-2005 held on December 10, 2004, where Quiambao was elected chairman and president.

    The RTC decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals on March 31, 2005.

    The High Tribunal denied with finality the motion for reconsideration filed by Quiambao and his group seeking a reversal of its January 29, 2007 decision where it invalidated the December 10, 2004  special stockholders’ meeting and election of board of directors ordered in the November 25, 2004 ruling of the Urdaneta RTC.

    The Supreme Court said the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the lower court has the power to call a special stockholders’ meeting involving an intracorporate controversy and that only the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may order a special stockholders’ meeting to be held under its provision.

    The intracorporate dispute between Yujuico and Cezar Quiambao started when the latter, after five months of their election as directors of the board in March 1, 2004, filed a suit before the San Carlos City RTC seeking the nullification of the holding of the Stradec’s stockholders’ meeting in its Pasig City office on ground of improper venue.

    Quiambao’s complaint also prayed that all ensuing transactions by the elected directors be nullified and a special stockholders’ meeting be held anew.

    In its resolution, the SC affirmed with finality its decision promulgated on January 29 by Associate Justice Angelina Sandoval-Gutierrez, granting the petition of Yujuico, Bonifacio, and Sumbilla, assailing the CA decision upholding the jurisdiction of the RTC over the controversy, and sustained the validity of Judge Emuslan’s order dated November 25, 2004.

    It remanded the case back to the Urdaneta City RTC for further proceedings.

    Last year, Quiambao became controversial after his business partner, Louie  Turgo, at Star Infrastructure Development Corp. (SIDC), the firm that built roads south of Manila, filed five estafa cases against him, involving P100 million of allegedly diverted funds. Turgo is the administrative and general affairs officer of SIDC.

    The complainant, who filed the estafa cases at the Pasig City Prosecutor’s Office, accused Quiambao of systematically plundering the corporation’s funds.

    Quiambao, who served as board chairman, chief executive officer, and treasurer of SIDC from 1997 to 2004, allegedly diverted the bulk of the funds to his relatives and to corporations under his control. The disbursements, the complainant alleged, did not have any approval from the SIDC board. The diversions were reported in external audits conducted by SGV.

    OTHER STORIES

    Teves clarifies resignation offer


    Delays in CMOL extraction costing RP


    Red tape worsens importers’ woes from new fees


    Firms eyeing bioethanol seeking perks


    Romulo in China; to tackle trade, investments with Wen


    Lacson questions freeze on funds during campaign period


    DBP seen to pitch $1-B hedging facility at exporters’ meeting


    Fund firms track OFWs moving to newer markets


    Owwa streamlines funds schemes to jack up earnings


    Owwa gets go-ahead on reorganization


    Transparency vowed in BOT-IRR


    Election of key Stradec execs invalid, says SC


    Breed diversity fast losing out in race–FAO