|
The
celebrated cases of the Quisumbings of Cebu involving
some P900 million in damages, claims and inheritances
may now have to go through the full route after Wesy B.
Quisumbing, who is largely credited for rehabilitating
the ailing Norkis-Summa Group of Companies starting in
the 1980s but was later disowned by her parents
allegedly for “exercising” her femininity, decided to
withdraw from the mediation proceedings.
Wesy
(formerly known as Norberto Wenceslao Jesus B.
Quisumbing III and/or Wessie B. Quisumbing) has asked a
Cebu City court through her counsel Paris G. Real of the
Real, Brotarlo & Real Law Offices to order the
resumption of hearings for the cases she filed after it
became apparent to her that the respondents are “not
sincere” in their offer to reach a compromise through
settlement.
Wesy has
filed 18 interrelated cases against the Norkis
Distributors Inc., Exquisite Pawnshop and Jewelry Inc.,
Norkis Group Management Systems, Inc., Norkis Trading
Inc., her parents Norberto B. Quisumbing Jr. and Britta
B. Quisumbing, the chairman and vice chairman of the
Norkis-Summa Group of Companies, respectively, and other
officers and persons employed by the respondents.
Among
the cases she filed are illegal removal as president and
chief executive officer of the said companies and the
annulment of the fictitious transfers of her shares of
stocks in these firms now pending at the sala of Judge
Ramon Daomilas Jr. of the Cebu City Regional Trial Court
Branch 11.
In the
manifestation and motion she filed on May 25 at the sala
of Judge Daomilas, Wesy noted that it was the counsel of
the respondents who broached the idea of amicable
settlement.
So in an
order dated
November 6, 2006,
Daomilas directed the parties to negotiate a possible
compromise agreement among themselves and then appear
before the court for a chamber conference on January 11,
2007, for the court to be informed and at the same time
evaluate the status of the settlement.
The date
was subsequently reset to January 18 although only Wesy,
who believes that her removal from the family-owned
group of companies in 2002 was due to her parent’s
disapproval of her sex change and subsequent marriage,
attended the meeting.
Wesy
said she was actually willing to “forgive and forget”
then the “injustices” she suffered in the hands of the
respondents and how she was disowned and was never
treated fairly since childhood.
Up to
this time, Wesy said the respondents have not presented
their written offers for compromise as directed by the
court.
“Let it
be placed on record that, on the basis of the offer of
reconciliation of the respondents, the petitioner is
willing to compromise with them on reasonable and just
terms. However, petitioner feels that such offer of
settlement is not really sincere but is a way on the
part of the respondents to delay the proceedings and
stifle the resolution of her legitimate cases on the
merits,” the motion said.
Wesy led
and rehabilitated the debt-ridden Norkis-Summa Group of
Companies in the 1980s until she was allegedly booted
out of the firm in October 2002. |