|
WHEN the
Ford Everest was first introduced in the country not so
long ago, it was a sales hit due to the fact that, at
that time only, the Blue Oval had the initiative to
build a diesel-fed, midsize, mass market-intended SUV.
Since then, Ford has seen the competition catch up
significantly and launched an all-new version in 2007’s
first quarter. But is the new Everest’s arrival too late
in an already crowded arena?
Much
like its predecessor, the 2007 Ford Everest has an
exterior that looks to meet headwinds head-on, damn the
drag coefficient. The big difference is that the current
model sports a better-looking front fascia, a grille
that has bigger inlets (for better airflow toward the
engine bay) and better-looking 16-inch rims. The side
step boards and tailgate-mounted full-size spare tire
are retained, and both features are a big help for short
passengers and for tire change emergencies.

Inside,
the tiered floor pan is also retained from the previous
model, and, as a result, all occupants (six to seven in relative comfort) are assured a towering view of
what’s ahead. All seats now (and the center console
lining) are wrapped in comfy moquette fabric, which
touch and feel greatly relaxes everybody inside even
after long drives. Both second and third rows fold and
tumble down for added space, and the Everest’s
forward-tumbling third row is easier to operate than the
50:50 lateral-split operation of the Toyota Fortuner.
Speaking of the Everest’s third row, lateral room has
improved, but is still lacking in knee-room. Lesson: the
Everest’s third row can only fit two adults standing
5'6" and below, kids or midgets.
The
cold air conditioning (A/C) has triple-zone ventilation
for all three rows, but the middle-front vents should be
bigger. The aluminum-lined, Ford Ranger-derived audio
entertainment and A/C controls are a big plus, but
apparently they were given bigger priority. Interior
lighting is rather inadequate, with the inside lamps
located only at the second row and near the tailgate
ceiling areas. The audio entertainment is nice, but its
backlighting should be brighter and it needs help at the
treble end.
The 2.5L
common-rail diesel direct injection engine (derived from
the current model Ford Ranger) has better low-end
response than its predecessor. A fatter torque curve
makes powerband entry (1,900 to 2,000 rpm) and partial
boost (3,000 rpm) comes in early in the rev counter, but
there’s a slight turbo lag due to the SUV’s weight (1,875 kg).
The five-speed manual transmission’s gearing is fairly
even, but fourth gear is tall. Clutch engagement and
effort to row the shifter requires moderate effort,
similar in feel to the 2007 Isuzu Alterra 4x2 M/T.
Nevertheless, the benefits of the upgraded engine and
weight shaving are obvious in the tested top speed (155
kph) and fuel consumption (9 km per liter, four days
mixed driving).
Handling
is somewhat better than its predecessor, with the
245/70R16 tires breaking traction (with loud tire
squeal) at 65 to 75 kph. There’s pronounced body roll
during hard cornering, but the ride (especially at the
rear) is better than the previous model. It’s less
bouncy, but leans more toward a floaty yet cushiony ride
comfort. Steering is moderately light to moderate in
feel, and blunt but manageable.
Despite
a disc and drum setup for the front and rear brakes,
stopping power is great, with the anti-lock system
waking up at one-half to three-fourths middle-pedal
effort. The umbrella-type handbrake parallel to the
driver’s right knee (similar in use to the Toyota
Tamaraw FXs) was retained from the previous model, and
gives great grip. Lighting from both headlights and fog
lights is great, but needs to be changed to aftermarket
HID (high-intensity discharge) units to provide better
night vision for the driver. The door locks are a big
change from the previous Everest, but are incorporated
into the door handle receptacles (similar to the Mazda
3) and need just a pull or push on the said locks’ tabs
to unlock or lock the doors.
The SUV
that was once the Blue Oval’s bread and butter is back
in a big way, and is much improved over its lumbering
predecessor. Its own way of portraying thrilled
ruggedness is sure to make owners wish they knew when to
quit driving fun, whether it’s on tarmac, hard earth or
pebbly roads. |