|
If
anything good came out from the current global food
crisis, that would be the renewed focus to invest in
research and development (R&D) in agriculture, similar
to the Green Revolution that prevented a burgeoning
famine in the 1960s.
The
renewed call for agricultural R&D, however, is a belated
silver lining. According to the International Food
Policy Research Institute, developing a stable and
superior crop variety takes seven to 10 years, and
agriculture innovators need past, cumulative stock of
research knowledge.
But
given the fact that agricultural R&D investments in
developing countries have an average rate of return of
43 percent, it’s still not entirely too late to start
allotting more funds to research.
We need
a global initiative in agricultural R&D against the
backdrop of increased global interdependence of the
agrifood production system.
But as
the present state of advanced technology, climate change
and globalization dictate re-engaging in agriculture in
a manner different from the Green Revolution, these same
conditions also compel a different, innovative approach
to agricultural R&D.
Three
major barriers offset the chances of small farmers in
developing countries to reap its benefits: the wide and
growing gap in funding between the developed and
developing world, less opportunities for technological
spillovers from developed countries and a changing
environment for innovation.
While 66
percent of public investment in agriculture R&D occurred
in developing countries, a huge chunk of it came from
China and India. In 2000 80 developing countries
accounted for only 6 percent of global R&D spending;
this aggregate is more than what each of 35 public
universities in the US spent in 2004.
And
because R&D in the developed world is shifting toward
enhancing food attributes and food systems rather than
in increasing productivity, less and less opportunities
are available for developing countries to adopt their
research breakthroughs.
Patent
rights, to start with, are now being introduced in
agriculture inventions, making it even less likely for
technological spillovers to occur.
While
industrialized economies like the US and Europe should
rightfully lead a global initiative in agricultural R&D,
developing countries such as the Philippines should
begin collaborative research and, at the same time,
aggressively pursue becoming self-reliant in conducting
its own R&D.
The
first step for the
Philippines
would be to increase agricultural R&D spending from the
current 0.1 percent to 1 percent of agriculture GDP, the
United Nations’ recommended level for developing
countries. Research breakthroughs must reach the
grassroots in order to be useful, hence, extension
services to farmers should, likewise, be strengthened,
and infrastructure that facilitates adopting new
technologies should be laid out.
E-mail: edgardo_angara@hotmail.com. Web site:
www.edangara.com. |