HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • NTRC: Legal gaps allowed
    Pagcor to pay less taxes
     
    By Jun Vallecera
    Reporter

    REVENUE officials believe the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor) has loosely interpreted the various tax laws to its advantage and want the loopholes closed.

    The National Tax Research Center (NTRC) found that Pagcor has withheld—through the liberal interpretation of what amounts to “gross earnings”—billions of pesos worth of earnings that should have been remitted to the government.

    Gross earnings or gross revenues determine how much Pagcor must set aside each year as franchise tax and as share of the government in its gaming operations, set in this case at 5 percent and 50 percent, respectively.

    Pagcor’s charter provides for a 5-percent franchise tax based on “gross revenues derived from its operations” and additionally, must remit half its “aggregate gross earnings” from the franchise to the national government, as well.

    Owing to lack of clear guidelines, however, Pagcor historically computed both tax and government share only on winnings from table games and from slot machine revenues generated by its 13 casino branches.

    The NTRC said Pagcor partakes of the winnings of its many casino licensees and these do not form part of its gross revenue base.

    Also, slot-machine revenues from so-called demo units, or those that Pagcor technically do not own as yet, also do not form part of the gross revenue base and revenues there are lumped instead as “other income.”

    The profitability of demo units may be gleaned from the fact that Pagcor generated P1.58 billion from them in 2006, comprising 58 percent of its “other income” account that year alone.

    “The use of winnings from table games and slot machines as basis for the franchise tax and government share may be appropriate during the early years [when] Pagcor income was basically from gaming tables inside the casinos. But since then Pagcor operations have evolved,” the NTRC stressed.

    NTRC chief Lina Isorena said Pagcor is now into bingo games, Internet gaming, chipwashing operations and even into the licensing of privately owned casinos, all of which produce substantial revenues.

    “There is, therefore, urgent need to evaluate and define the sources of income on which the franchise tax and the 50-percent government share are based,” she said.

    Pagcor generated total income in excess of P24 billion in 2006 but it computed the franchise tax and the government share on the basis of revenues totaling only P19.4 billion, according to Isorena. Pagcor has argued the balance was derived from its “nongaming” operations that include bingo, chipwashing, Internet gaming and licensing.

    Presidential Decree 1869 issued in July 11, 1983, mandated Pagcor to pay a 5-percent franchise tax in place of all other taxes and must also remit half its gross earnings to the national government.

    It also pays income tax derived from related services operations, shows and entertainment and has also paid the regular corporate income tax since May 2005 when its exemption was lifted.

    Pagcor’s gross receipts have also been levied the 12-percent value- added tax.

    OTHER STORIES

    ’08 growth seen at only 5.8%


    Government gears up for high oil prices


    Ready for storm, or headless strategy?


    Foresight, civic spirit to carry DepEd’s day


    Tubbataha Reef now No. 2; Pinoy online power cited


    Pippa agrees: Epira changes not needed


    Challenge to biz, government: Beef up service info


    NTRC: Legal gaps allowed Pagcor to pay less taxes


    Key Cabinet members face confirmation