|
THE
economic slowdown should serve as a test of our
capability to surmount the difficulties facing us these
days.
I am
referring to the not-so-good news that our economic
growth—as expressed in terms of gross domestic product
(GDP), or simply the total value of goods and services
we produce, excluding income from abroad—had slowed down
to 5.2 percent in the first three months of 2008,
compared with 6.9 percent in the first quarter of 2007.
This
report has prompted economists and analysts, both from
the government and the private sector, to scale down
their growth forecasts for the whole year.
The
Development Budget Coordination Committee, which earlier
set a GDP growth range target of 6.3 percent to 7
percent, reduced it to 5.7 percent to 6.5 percent to
take into account the first-quarter performance.
Some
experts from the private sector are predicting as low as
4 percent, but I think this is unrealistically
pessimistic.
As a
matter of fact, bankers, whose business and profession
make them the most conservative players in the economy,
are not so pessimistic.
One has
been quoted in the news media as saying “the first
quarter was a bad quarter.” He cites the rare
combination of high oil prices and high food prices as
the main factor behind the slowdown, not because of high
prices, per se, but because it triggered a sort of
hoarder’s attitude among suppliers and producers and a
sort of panic-buying mentality among consumers,
effectively distorting the law of supply and demand.
So, what
I would like to point out here is the good or positive
side emerging from the current economic situation. I
remember that we went through the 1997 Asian financial
crisis. That was really bad for us because it hit us
when we did not have adequate resources to fall back on,
and economic growth was fragile and narrow-based,
limited to the real-estate industry.
In
contrast, the 7.3-percent GDP growth in 2007, which was
a 31-year high, was broad-based. All major sectors of
the economy contributed to the expansion. More than $14
billion of remittances, mostly from overseas Filipino
workers (OFWs), pushed the peso to its strongest
position in recent years, although it also had a
downside—it hurt exporters and the families of OFWs.
Despite
predictions that remittances will decline this year
because of the slowdown in the
United States
and other countries, remittances grew by 12 percent in
the first quarter to reach $2.8 billion.
We are
still on track to breaching the $16-billion remittances
mark this year because we continue to send workers
abroad, and many of them are landing in highly paid
jobs.
There is
very little we can do about petroleum prices because we
still import most of our requirements, but on the
positive side, high prices encourage prudent spending,
which, in the end, will reduce our oil imports and, in
turn, boost our foreign-exchange position. In addition,
it serves as an incentive to boost the development of
alternative fuel sources, such as renewable and
indigenous biofuel.
Now,
speaking of the real-estate industry, the boom that
started in 2004 is still going strong, and I am
confident the industry will continue to grow despite the
global challenges.
There
are several factors that combine to strengthen the
property sector and keep it on the high-growth track.
First, OFWs and Filipino immigrants and their
remittances, which continue to provide demand for
housing, coupled with the pent-up demand from the
post-1997 crisis. Second, the flourishing
business-process outsourcing industry, which continues
to attract foreign investments. And third, the boom in
the tourism industry. Some 1.11 million tourists visited
the
Philippines in
the first four months of 2008, reflecting a 7.5-percent
increase compared with the same period in 2007. They
spent a total of $1.3 billion.
One
advantage that the global slowdown provides us is that
we are close to the tourist markets. According to
statistics from the Department of Tourism, 20 percent of
our visitors during the January-to-April 2008 period
came from Korea. The United States was a close 19.4
percent, but I think many of the visitors from the US
are immigrants—we can count on them to continue coming
here to visit relatives or to take their vacations.
With
respect to visitors from other countries, the rising
airfare rates and cost of living may discourage overseas
travel.
To our
advantage, we are close to China and Japan, which are
becoming the biggest sources of tourists. During the
first four months of 2008, visitors from China accounted
for only 5.7 percent of total tourist arrivals; Japan
accounted for 11.6 percent. This means that we have
barely scratched the surface of the Chinese tourism
market, and still have a lot of potential from Japan.
I would
suggest that, in addition to the already successful
promotion programs of the Tourism department, we sell
the Philippines as the cheapest place and the most
beautiful country to visit.
Other
positive factors that I believe will help us cope with
the current global situation and sustain high economic
growth are the following:
• The
government expects to reach or exceed its revenue target
of P1.09 trillion this year.
• The
exchange rate, now at P44 to the dollar, is still far
from the P55 to $1 that we experienced a couple of years
ago, but it should raise the hopes of our exporters,
besides increasing the purchasing power of OFWs and
their families.
I would
only ask that special attention be given to the plight
of many of our countrymen as a result of the surge in
inflation to 9.6 percent in May. According to a study by
the Asian Development Bank, for every 10-percent
increase in inflation, 2.3 million Filipinos fall into
poverty.
I
recognize that some measures are now being implemented
or lined up, such as subsidies for lifeline power
consumers and fuel discounts for public transportation.
I believe the government should look for other ways to
help our people survive the current crises. It is good
that we are enjoying healthy revenue flow, part of which
can be used to support these programs. In the end, it’s
just the primary objective of taxes—for the benefit of
the people.
Summing
up, I look at our performance in the first quarter as a
test of our capability to face challenges and stay on
the high-growth track.
If we
fail, then our performance in 2007, which is already
being questioned by some economists, will be nothing
more than a fluke. If we succeed, despite the odds, then
we, as well as the investors, can gain confidence.
And so,
let’s take the test and pass it.
You may send your comments/feedback to mbvillar_comments@yahoo.com. |