|
THE
Court of Appeals has affirmed with finality the
P6.2-billion compromise agreement entered into by the
state-owned Philippine National Construction Corp. (PNCC)
with Radstock Securities Limited to end court
litigations involving PNCC’s unpaid loans due to the
latter.
In a
nine-page resolution penned by Associate Justice Mariano
del Castillo, the CA’s former First Division rejected
the motion for reconsideration filed by Strategic
Alliance Development Corp. (Stradec) and Marcos
associate Rodolfo Cuenca, seeking to reverse the January
25, 2007 decision of the appellate court. Cuenca is a
stockholder of PNCC and former president and chairman of
the board of directors.
The CA
held that the agreement is “not contrary to law, morals,
good customs, public order and public policy.”
It also
enjoined the parties to “faithfully comply” with the
terms and conditions of the agreement.
“A
judgment of the court approving a compromise agreement
puts an end to litigation and is final and immediately
executory. And nothing is more settled in law than that
once a judgment attains finality it thereby becomes
immutable and unalterable. It may no longer be modified
in any respect, except to correct clerical errors or
mistakes . . . . Any amendment or alteration which
substantially affects a final and executory judgment, is
null and void for lack of jurisdiction.” the CA
declared.
In
dismissing Stradec and
Cuenca’s
motion, the CA upheld the position of PNCC and Radstock
that their motion cannot be allowed since it was filed
only after the final and executory judgment on January
25, 2007.
The CA
ruling rejected their plea for a full or new trial of
Radstock’s collection suit, which had led to a
P13-billion award by the regional trial court of
Mandaluyong City. The total value of the debt has now
ballooned to P17 billion due to additional penalties and
interests since the date of ruling.
The CA
noted that the High Court’s 2006 ruling, which dismissed
PNCC’s efforts to throw out the collection suit, had
already tackled the points raised by Stradec and Cuenca.
It also pointed out that the Supreme Court had earlier
mooted Stradec’s motion to intervene in its decision.
Presiding Justice Ruben Reyes and Associate Justice
Arcangelita Romilla Lontok concurred with the ruling.
Under
the agreement, Radstock, an assignee of Marubeni Corp.,
will receive from PNCC a “compromise amount” of P6.196
billion to settle its P2.02- billion loan obtained 26
years ago.
PNCC’s
credit obligation to Radstock has ballooned from P2.02
billion to P17.04 billion due to interest and other
penalties, according to documents submitted to Court.
The
agreement was signed on August 17 by the respective
board of directors of both PNCC and Radstock.
The
payment of the amount will result in the dropping of the
complaint for sum of money and damages filed by Radstock
against PNCC.
The
compromise amount shall be paid by PNCC by conveying to
a third-party assignee, designated by Radstock, all its
rights and interest to various real properties including
a 10-hectare land located along Roxas Boulevard with a
transfer value of only P3.82 billion.
Other
PNCC real properties covered by the agreement are
situated in Parañaque, Tagaytay, including the Town and
Country Estate in Antipolo and a farm in Bulacan.
The
agreement also obliges PNCC to cede 20 percent of its
outstanding capital stock to Radstock. The assigned
value of these shares is pegged at P713 million based on
the approximate last trading price of PNCC shares in the
Philippine Stock Exchange.
It also
binds PNCC to assign to Radstock 50 percent of its
6-percent share in the gross toll revenue of the Manila
North Tollways Corp. (MNTC) with a net present value of
P1.287 billion.
In a
press statement, Radstock director, Carlos Dominguez,
welcomed the CA decision, saying it capped a long legal
battle.
He said
the compromise agreement represents a settlement of +/-
36 cents on the dollar of PNCC’s total debt obligation,
a figure that is in line with accepted practice in the
resolution of bad debts.
“To pay
P6 billion for a P17-billion debt is very reasonable any
way you look at it,” Dominguez pointed out.
“The
compromise agreement came about because after the
rejection of PNCC’s motions in the higher courts, the
company faced strong odds of losing the case, which we
had already won in the lower court,” Dominguez said.
|