The future of corporate
governance
Mirror Image
Benjamin A.I. Espiritu
In May 2001, the Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas (BSP) issued Circular
283 mandating the adoption of good corporate governance practices
by members of the boards of directors of banks and nonbank financial
institutions under its jurisdiction.
In April of the following
year, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) came out with
its Code of Corporate Governance. This code covered corporations
whose securities are registered or listed, corporations which
are grantees of permits/licenses and secondary franchise from
the SEC, and public companies and branches or subsidiaries of
foreign corporations operating in the Philippines whose securities
are registered or listed.
In July of the same
year, the Insurance Commission (IC) promulgated the Code of Corporate
Governance for Insurance Companies and Intermediaries. The IC
Code applies to all life, nonlife insurance companies, professional
reinsurers and insurance intermediaries.
In June 2004, the Energy
Regulatory Commission (ERC) launched its program to promote good
corporate governance in distribution utilities.
To ensure that good
corporate governance practices are internalized, the four government
agencies took the extra step of mandating the training of the
directors of the companies.
Corporate governance:
What the future holds
The promulgation of the corporate
governance codes and the training required for members of the board of directors
of companies regulated by the BSP, SEC, IC and ERC has forever changed the character
of corporate governance in the Philippines. It has clarified the role of the
board of directors vis-à-vis that of management, resulting in more active
and proactive boards. No longer will boards of directors be considered as mere
“rubber-stamps” of management actions.
However, people often ask how long
these reforms will last. Is it simply a fad? Will the focus on good corporate
governance decrease and slowly die down as the years go by? What is the future
of corporate governance in the Philippines?
The continuation of the corporate
governance training program, observed supervision of the regulatory agencies,
conversations with several directors, shareholders and stakeholders of various
companies covered by the corporate governance regulations make me venture this
forecast:
1. The focus on corporate governance,
the measures taken to have good corporate governance practices in companies
covered by corporate governance regulations, will continue. Corporate governance
is not a fad but an actual improvement in the manner by which companies are
directed and controlled. Corporate governance will be institutionalized because:
1) best global practices dictate it; 2) it is necessary in a globalized and
competitive economy; and 3) it truly contributes to the enhancement of shareholder
value and contributes to the nation’s economic competitiveness.
2. Corporate governance regulations
will be encouraged, and may even be mandated, for small and medium-sized enterprises.
This will happen because minority shareholders and other stakeholders will demand
it for the protections of their interests. Likewise, since good corporate governance
has been proven to enhance shareholder value and contribute to the nation’s
economic competitiveness, it is in the interest of small- and medium-sized enterprises
to adopt it.
3. There will be an increasing number
of family corporations that will employ formal family governance structures.
Given the need to comply with corporate governance regulations, and a real desire
to have good corporate governance, an increasing number of family corporations
will have formal family governance structures with a family council, family
assembly and/or advisory council.
4. There will be increased independence
in the relationship between the board of directors and management. This check
and balance will come about as a natural consequence of the boards of directors
doing their job as mandated by regulation and by global practices, by management
adhering to its role as the implementer of the policies promulgated by the board,
and by shareholders and other stakeholders demanding it, particularly for publicly
listed companies.
Regardless of the size of the company,
the days of the “rubber-stamp” board will be, generally, a thing
of the past.
All of the preceding will generally
mean better governance by the board of directors, and better management by the
company’s managers. This all redounds to the benefit of the shareholders
and other stakeholders, the public at large, and the nation as a whole.
“Mirror Image”
is a rotating column featuring writers from the DLSU Professional Schools Inc.
Benjamin A.I. Espiritu is the chairman
of the Business and Governance Department of the De La Salle-Professional Schools
Inc. Graduate School of Business.
|