|
Boardroom battles are common and the current fight over
management control of the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco)
is nothing unusual. Ignore for a moment that the
Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) is a
quasigovernment corporation and the potential politics
involved. It is, at its simplest, an effort by two
groups that own and directly control about the same
percentage of share ownership to try to run the company.
Meralco
is a publicly owned and listed company, meaning that
anyone can share in the potential price appreciation of
its shares and can receive a portion of company profits
when dividends are declared.
This
company is a public utility, which means it has a
monopoly in the delivery of service to the public. In
return for the benefits of not having any competition,
the government regulates how much profit the company can
make. Normally, the regulated price that it sells its
services to the public depends on the rate of return or
profit the company will make and that is controlled by
the government.
In
theory, without government regulation, Meralco could
charge whatever price it wanted and the public would
have no choice but to pay or not have electric service.
But Meralco prices are under government control.
Therefore, the government has an obligation to keep the
price charged as low as possible to serve the best
public interests while, at the same time, allow enough
return to keep the company financially sound, able to
expand and enhance company business interests and allow
the shareholders to make money on their investment.
A public
utility must serve both the public interest and the
interest of its investors. However, because of the
government control of pricing, it is the absolute
obligation of government regulators to protect and serve
the public interest. Then, after the regulations are
set, it is management’s responsibility to protect
shareholder interests within the boundaries that the
regulators establish.
It is
not the job of the Meralco management to protect the
public. That is the government’s job. It is not the job
of government to protect the Meralco shareholders. That
is the management’s job.
If I am
a shareholder of Meralco, I want the company to charge
P50 per kilowatt-hour so my company can make a lot of
profit. As a consumer, I want the government to keep
electricity prices as low as possible while insuring
reliable service. Any reasonable person can see that
there can be an inherent conflict of interest in those
two positions. That is why public utilities function
best when privately owned and operated and regulated by
the government.
The idea
of “public interest” is a little confusing also. “Public
interest” is only an issue not because of the product
that Meralco delivers, but because it is a monopoly.
Clean and pure drinking water is just as much a matter
of public interest as electricity. Yet there is no
discussion about the pricing of bottled water because
there are hundreds of suppliers. Because it is a free
market, prices range in my area from P30 to P50 per
bottle.
If you
are a Meralco shareholder, you have no obligation to
concern yourself with the public interest. Again, that
is the government regulator’s job. You need to protect
your Meralco investment by making sure your company’s
management is doing the best job possible for the
company.
The
issues raised by the GSIS are important to you as a
company owner since both sides are asking for your
support. This is almost like a political campaign in the
sense that there is an incumbent management with a track
record you can look at and a challenger that has some
specific proposals for your corporation.
A very
sensitive issue is the purchase of power by Meralco from
the Lopez group electricity generator First Gen Corp.
The controlling management of Meralco also controls
First Gen. No question that this arrangement makes for
bad public relations for a public utility.
Unquestionably, as a public company, this arrangement
would raise a few eyebrows and would deserve shareholder
scrutiny. According to the 2007 Meralco Annual Report,
First Gen sells electricity, including transmission
costs, to Meralco at a lower rate (P4.91 v. P6.25) than
the National Power Corp. (Napocor). Yet GSIS wants
Meralco to buy a majority of its electricity from
Napocor, reducing purchases from the independent
producers. Either I am missing something or a further
explanation is needed.
The
expenses of Meralco are too high, we are told, because
of an excess of employees. Fair enough. Last year,
Meralco posted a P3.6-billion profit. Shareholders
should be told how much savings could accrue through new
management initiatives and what effect their efforts
would have on the bottom line. Meralco paid a P1 cash
dividend and a 10-percent stock dividend in 2007. What
effect will a new management team have on those numbers?
For
shareholders, the issue is clear; and the issue is not
GSIS versus Lopez. It is only about having the best
possible team run a profitable publicly owned company,
which just happens to hold a government-regulated
monopoly. However, if Meralco is now going to be
operated principally in the “public interest” and not
for “shareholder interest,” sell your stock as quickly
as possible at any price. If any potential new
management can run Meralco more effectively, efficiently
and profitably, buy more shares.
E-mail comments to mangun@email.com. |