|
If you
think the US dollar looks wobbly now, just wait until
Barack Obama becomes president. At least that’s how
billionaire investor Carl Icahn envisions a United
States run by the Democratic front-runner. Icahn says an
Obama presidency would bring higher interest rates and a
loss of international confidence in the dollar.
“I
personally think he would be a terrible president,”
Icahn said at an investors’ conference in
New York
last week. Obama would probably go on a “huge spending
spree” that “the country can’t afford right now.”
Coupled
with the higher tax rates that the Illinois senator has
already endorsed, “you would have a loss of confidence
in the dollar,” leading to accelerating inflation and
“much higher interest rates,” Icahn said.
Now
let’s return to planet Earth, where confidence in the
dollar could scarcely be lower if the Marx Brothers were
in charge. Between rampant government spending, the
disastrous invasion of Iraq, the subprime-loan debacle
and unsustainable environmental policies, it’s unclear
why anyone would have great trust in the world’s reserve
currency.
Are
Obama’s proposed policies really the recipe for disaster
Icahn suggests?
“It
would be devastating,” Icahn said, adding that, “I don’t
think Obama really understands economics.”
Unsustainable policies
What
Icahn ignores is the extent to which many of the
investors who control the dollar’s value lack confidence
in the administration of President George W. Bush.
Traveling around
Asia and Europe,
one hears much carping about US policies that seem as
short-sighted as they do unsustainable.
While
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson maintains the illusion
that the United States favors a strong dollar, he seems
unperturbed by its decline. Both the euro and yen are up
more than 17 percent against the dollar in the last 12
months. Bush also has passed the proverbial buck to the
Federal Reserve to stabilize a slowing economy. The
lowest short-term interest rates since late 2004 are
undermining the dollar.
Obama is
currently leading Sen. Hillary Clinton in the race for
the Democratic presidential nomination. Could either do
any worse than the current White House occupant when it
comes to protecting the value of the dollar? It’s
doubtful.
****
The
action in Bali over the weekend wasn’t at the Indonesian
island’s famed beaches, swanky resorts or teeming
nightclubs. It was at the gas stations.
Gas
lines in the Nusa Dua region backed up into streets,
halting traffic. Scattered protesters carried placards
reading “Save Our Subsidies.” The reference was to the
government’s May 24 increase in fuel prices by 33
percent, the first in almost three years.
The step
was aimed at cutting subsidy costs and luring investors
back to the nation’s bonds and currency. While necessary
from a fiscal standpoint, it was a risky move by
President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.
It was
the increasing cost of living that ended Suharto’s
32-year dictatorship in Indonesia in 1998 amid violent
protests. Student demonstrations over the weekend
prompted the government to deploy about 300,000
policemen nationwide to guard shopping malls, gas
stations and public buildings.
Rising
fuel and food prices put the fourth-most-populous nation
on the frontlines of a dangerous trend in
Asia: poverty.
About 600 million Asians survive on less than $1 a day.
Accelerating inflation also will hurt families making
$2, $3 or even $20 a day.
Any
sudden return of social instability will spook investors
betting on Asia’s rapid growth. It also will test
Yudhoyono’s leadership as rarely before. If he fails,
the almost 12-percent drop in the Jakarta Composite
Index this year will accelerate, perhaps scaring away
the investment that the country needs.
****
What’s
$3.2 billion between friends? Ask investors in Japanese
stocks. That’s how much that friendly ties between
companies cost shareholders last fiscal year.
The
loss, compiled by Nomura Holdings Inc., says much about
what’s wrong with Japan six years after it began
recovering from the banking crises of the 1990s and
early 2000s. Executives in Asia’s biggest economy are
still more concerned about protecting their turf than
shareholder value.
Cross-shareholdings in
Japan
go back to the 19th century. In 2008 one would have
thought the practice had long ago been shelved. Yet, it
has made a comeback in recent years as companies shored
up defenses against hostile takeovers. It’s part of a
bigger problem.
‘Most
closed’
“Foreign
direct investment is extremely important,” Haruo
Shimada, head of a government advisory group, said on
May 19. “Japan needs to work harder as global
competition is becoming intense.”
In April
European Union Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson called
Japan the developed world’s “most closed” market. For
executives, it’s all about control. Friendly companies
investing in each other think they are doing what’s best
for Japan Inc. Things may not turn out as planned.
“The
irony,” said Kengo Nishiyama, a strategist at Nomura in
Tokyo, “is that companies do cross-holdings to prevent
takeovers, but as that can cause their stock prices to
fall, it may make a buyout attempt more likely.” |