|
“What
one must lose in order to win is sometimes not worth the
price of playing.”—The Rude Pundit
Hillary
Clinton said she would stay in the Democratic Party’s
presidential primaries all the way to the end. There’s
nothing wrong with that. It ain’t over till it’s over,
and her supporters expect her to put up a good fight.
Unfortunately, she’s fighting dirty in order to win.
After
losing heavily in
North Carolina
and narrowly winning Indiana, Hillary claimed the two
elections showed Obama did not have the support of
“working, hard-working Americans, white Americans.” The
Rude Pundit decoded that language for anyone too dense
to understand its meaning.
He
wrote: “Clinton’s final appeal for the Democratic
nomination is this: ‘America is a racist nation. While
there’s a lot of black people who will vote for me,
there’s way more white people who won’t vote for Obama
because they think he’s a Muslim nigger.’”
But
putting aside her not-so-subtle appeal to racism—which,
unfortunately, is still normal in any American electoral
contest involving a white and a nonwhite—the big foul
committed by Hillary is trying to change the rules of
the game after she pledged to abide by them.
Last
year the states of
Florida
and Michigan leapfrogged the Democratic electoral
calendar by setting their primaries before the
traditional opening contests of Iowa and New Hampshire.
The Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) rules panel
responded by declaring the Florida primary out of order
and stripped the state of its delegates. Michigan would
suffer the same fate. (By the way, 12 of the 30 DNC
committee members who voted to disenfranchise Florida’s
voters belonged to Hillary.)
On
September 1, 2007, a week after the DNC’s decision, all
the major Democratic Party candidates signed a pledge
not to campaign or participate in the Florida and
Michigan primaries.
Hillary’s campaign issued the following statement:
“We
believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina
play a unique and special role in the nominating
process. And we believe the DNC’s rules and its calendar
provide the necessary structure to respect and honor
that role. Thus, we will be signing the pledge to adhere
to the DNC-approved nominating calendar.”
In
October 2007, before the
Michigan
primary, Hillary said, “It’s clear this election [that
what] they are having is not going to count for
anything.”
Three
months later, after “winning” the
Florida
and Michigan “primaries,” Hillary changed her mind. She
said, “I believe our nominee will need the enthusiastic
support of Democrats in these states to win the general
election, and so I will ask my Democratic convention
delegates to support seating the delegations from
Florida and Michigan. . . . I hope to be president of
all 50 states and
US
territories, and that we have all 50 states represented
and counted at the Democratic convention. I hope my
fellow potential nominees will join me in this.”
By the
last week of May, Hillary was arguing that the
re-enfranchisement of the delegates of Florida and
Michigan was a crusade to save what America is all
about.
She told
an audience in
Boca Raton,
Florida,
“I am here today because I believe that the decision our
party faces is not just about the fate of these votes
and the outcome of these primaries. It is about whether
we will uphold our most fundamental values as Democrats
and Americans. . . .
“Because
here in America, unlike in many other nations, we are
bound together not by a single shared religion or
cultural heritage, but by a shared set of ideas and
ideals, a shared civic faith, that we are entitled to
speak and worship freely, that we deserve equal justice
under the law, that we have certain core rights that no
government can abridge, and these rights are rooted in
and sustained by the principle that our founders set
forth in the Declaration of Independence. That a just
government derives its power from the consent of the
governed, that each of us should have an equal voice in
determining the destiny of our nation. A generation of
patriots risked and sacrificed lives on the battlefield
for that ideal. . . .
“Now,
I’ve heard some say that counting Florida and Michigan
would be changing the rules. I say that not counting
Florida
and Michigan is changing a central governing rule of
this country—that whenever we can understand the clear
intent of the voters, their votes should be counted. . .
. The votes of 1.7 million people should not be cast
aside because of a technicality. The people who voted
did nothing wrong, and it would be wrong to punish you.”
Hillary
Clinton reminds me of another female politician who
reneged on a pledge.
Buencamino is a fellow of Action for EconomicReforms (www.aer.ph). |