HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Meralco says ‘ouch’
    to lifeline petition
     
    By Paul A. Isla
    Reporter

    WHY just us?

    Ivanna de la Peña, vice president and head for utility economics of Manila Electric Co. (Meralco), asked this question when the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) filed a petition suggesting that the country’s largest power distributor should absorb the lifeline-rate subsidies for power users consuming less than 100 kilowatt-hour (kWh).

    De la Peña said Meralco would have to quantify the impact should the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) rules in favor of the DTI.

    The lifeline subsidy of Meralco had already amounted to P250 million in March, de la Peña said.

    “That’s for Meralco. But other distribution utilities and electric cooperatives also have lifeline subsidies which are covered by the Electric Power Industry Reform Act [Epira],” said de la Peña.

    She said the ERC should determine who the marginalized users are. It currently covers those consuming 100 kWh and below, who represents 40 percent of power consumers.

    De la Peña said Meralco is collecting P1/kWh for distribution, supply and metering.

    She added that Meralco did not earn a reasonable return last year after only having a return-on-rate base of 6.9 percent.

    On Friday the DTI filed a petition with the ERC to order the refund of the lifeline subsidy given by bigger customers of Meralco under the company’s lifeline rate-discount program.

    In its petition, the DTI noted that there is no provision in the Epira that authorizes a lifeline subsidy to be paid by other classes of consumers and that any implementing rules or resolutions of the commission to the contrary are void and not authorized by law.

    Meralco’s current lifeline-subsidy program makes bigger customer classes shoulder the discounts given to marginalized customers.

    The DTI said Meralco should shoulder the subsidy.

    The petition stated that the discounts granted to certain classes of consumers were held valid by the Supreme Court for reasons of public interests, such as the discounts to senior citizens.

    It added that the discounts granted to certain classes of consumers should be absorbed by the establishments, and Meralco must not be extended a different privilege, it being a business engaged in a public utility and imbued with public interest.

    The DTI also petitioned the ERC to allow the expansion of the lifeline subsidy to 150 kWh from the current 100 kWh.

    The proposal includes increasing the discounts to 60 percent, 40 percent and 30 percent for those consuming 0 to 50 kWh, 51 kWh to 70 kWh, and 71 kWh to 100 kWh, respectively.

    Or, it said, the consumption block may be increased to 150 kWh, and spread out the discounts equitably. Thus, from 0 to 50 kWh the discount is 50 percent; 51 kWh to 100 kWh, 35 percent; and 101 kWh to 150 kWh, 20 percent.

    Currently, Meralco lifeline-rate users consuming to 50 kWh, 51 kWh to 70 kWh and 71 kWh to 100 kWh receive discounts of 50 percent, 35 percent and 20 percent, respectively.

    OTHER STORIES

    Lopezes maintain control over Meralco


    Meralco defies SEC’s ‘order’


    2 groups of SEC reps steal scene at Meralco


    Meralco says ‘ouch’ to lifeline petition


    Government hints of 2008 budget deficit


    Food imports swell March bill


    Manufacturing output still shrinking


    Solon justifies tax-credit inquiry


    Ex-US base now 1st-class resort