|
This one
doesn’t have veteran boardroom lawyer Popoy Ricalde in
it. That alone indicates it won’t be fought on the
merits of performance or anything that pretends to
legitimate equity interests. But its pretensions worm
deeper where the cistern lies and torpid methane
accumulates.
Unlike
those fought over Oriental Petroleum or the ominous
Equitable-PCIBank precedent, the Manila Electric Co.’s (Meralco)
is an acoustic war.
Fortunately, for those victimized by insidious
infestation, victories won in congressional
grandstanding and yelling, e-mail blasts and press
releases are pyrrhic and hollow. Meralco’s investors
know there is no potent substance to insinuations of
distribution overcharging or gross mismanagement.
Moreover, the circus rings are inconsequential. From
opinion columns to the Power Commission, the Energy
Regulatory Commission (ERC) and the enclaves of
sycophants and suck-ups, with all sound and fury
mustered, none can alter capital structure.
Outside
two-thirds of Meralco’s investor base, the real market
for the controversies is small, probably at 10 percent
comprised of uncommitted fund managers, bankers and
industrial partners. The rest are impotent periphery,
disenfranchised from the swing that one-third-held
entities need to expel management.
The
Lopez family has 33.4 percent effectively committed;
while interlopers combined, 33 percent. Both are slivers
away from veto powers, but light years away from total
majorities and control.
It would
take an interstellar wormhole to reach where ownerships
are absolute. To compute the cost, take 51 percent of
Meralco’s market capitalization, deduct 33 percent and
then multiply by its share price. While the distance
remains unconquerable, ranting, blabber and drone have
reduced values so that gobblers approach striking
distance.
From the
stock value immediately prior to this controversy deduct
the acquisition cost of the government’s 33 percent.
Match that against the recent fall. Sans time values,
the arithmetic shows the imprudent recklessness that
readily endangers and dissipates capital gains and
public-school teachers’ and other pensioners’ (SSS,
PhilHealth, etc.) investments, if only to pursue a
benefactor’s vendetta.
Worse,
ranting increases financing costs. By reducing stock
values where these secure debts, in the amount needed to
replenish collateral and maintain borrowing requisites,
debt costs rise. These apply upward pressures on a
utility’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), and
since, under the ERC’s pricing mechanisms, tariff is a
function of the WACC, these increase burdens on
consumers. So much for self-vaunted raiding acumen.
Critics’ reckless ramblings directly hurt Meralco
investors and consumers.
In this
proxy war, inflicting financial ruin, or failing that,
dictatorial control, is the real issue. Not sideshows
from system losses to insidious Trojan horse
representation. These are as unrelated to rates as
Ortigas Avenue is distant to the rotting refuse piled
along the northern banks of the Pasig downstream west of
Nagtahan.
There is
no initiative to nationalize or even grant consumer
equity. The slip that shows is an unwashed slip. If
rates were the real issues, then Arroyo, with her
ill-applied expanded value added tax, royalties and
uptakes, is at fault.
But it
would be foolish to discount the venom of pretentious
wrath. When tantrums turn into phone-pal calls, such as
the archetypal “’Yung dagdag, ’yung dagdag” or
“Will I still get my one million?”, for uncommitted
proxies, it is difficult to hang up when one gets a call
from the Palace.
We only
wish her pit bulls had more pedigree. Or at least enough
to understand what they rant against.
For
instance, inquiring legislators neither differentiate
among operating expenses, overhead and cost of energy
distributed, nor between direct and indirect expenses or
those capitalized against those consumed. To create
illusions, they focus on peso absolutes, hoping the
number of zeroes depict excesses.
But the
law does not appreciate absolutes. A number without a
dividend is worthless. It has no benchmarks. Correctly,
statutes measure percentages to define parameters. The
audited figures prove Meralco within statutory limits.
Its electricity operating expenses at 0.27 percent
remains far below Republic Act 7832’s legal cap.
It’s
Accounting 101 and preschool logic. Yet, critics
maliciously aggregated and then went to town with the
illusion of expenses burdened on consumers.
In the
House they’ve forgotten the concept of capacity fees.
Never mind also the concept of economic off-takes. Never
mind what they wrote into the Electric Power Industry
Reform Act. They now label that as “ghost deliveries.”
Never
mind the lying. The caliber of the accusations to array
proxies, in their fuzzy logic, betrays that this is not
about competence.
There
are ludicrous apples-and-oranges comparisons. That among
Mindanao and Cebu’s power economics matched against
Luzon’s is a case in point. Mindanao and Cebu’s cheaper
renewable and indigenous sources do not compare.
Cebu imports via
a 400-megawatt submarine cable. It has scant reserves at
peak hours, and actual offtakes surpass contractual
limits, rendering any take-or-pay issue senseless.
The most
deceiving involve system losses. These are not
distribution inefficiencies. The charge is a
cost-recovery facility for electrical dissipation due to
heat, line resistance, transformers, dielectrics, corona
and others that constitute technical losses because
transmission power is landed far from high-load areas.
Include here malfunctions, pilferages and those supplied
to establishments that must always be 100-percent
energized.
In the
Meralco franchise area, 80 percent of which covers rural
Bulacan, Cavite, Batangas, Rizal, Laguna and parts of
Quezon, technical losses range between 5 percent and 6
percent.
Because
utilities advance for generation costs, it is
statutorily protected within acceptable tolerances. In
the United States losses average 7.5 percent. In India,
31 percent. Ours is 9.5 percent, with 1 percent for
administrative usage.
The last
category was deliberately spun to incite unthinking
anger. The 1-percent limit includes unpaid public
lighting, wherein most other economies is free. The
technical-loss limit for electric cooperatives is 14
percent, albeit the National Electrification
Administration shows many average 30 percent to 40
percent. If we erase limits just to accommodate a
vendetta, rural economies would suffer first and then
suffer several-fold.
Wrath
blinds both instigators and the ill-educated. The
vengeful must dig two graves. Unfortunately, these
obscure the real issues. While investors are far more
intelligent, so far we’ve had nothing but soundbyte and
incendiary analyses from proxy protagonists. And from
hollow ordnances exploded, Meralco’s rabid critics
wildly extrapolate. |