HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Tug of war over DOF database
     
    By Lourdes Fernandez
    Editor in Chief

    BUSINESS groups have quietly alerted Malacańang Palace to an open-ended congressional inquiry that they consider a risk to their operations because it is forcing the Department of Finance (DOF) to release its sensitive database on the operations of companies applying for tax credits.

    While Congress has the power to require an Executive office to submit records and pertinent documents when Congress performs policymaking and oversight functions, the demand by Rep. Arnulfo Fuentebella for the DOF’s One-Stop Shop (OSS) Tax Credit and Duty Drawback Center to release to his office its entire database could jeopardize the welfare of private businesses, according to highly reliable sources.

    Efforts to reach the center’s executive director Ernesto Hiansen at the weekend were in vain, but the sources said Hiansen was reluctant to release the database to the committee because Fuentebella had made very sweeping claims of “continuing anomalies” in the tax-credit system without giving specifics.

    Giving the database and the companies’ sensitive data could open up the Executive to lawsuits, according to sources.

    The release of the database could only further shake business confidence in the country, sources explained to the BusinessMirror.  The database contains confidential and intimate details about the operational and financial aspects of companies applying for tax-credit certificates (TCCs). These data
    are important in the evaluation by the DOF’s one-stop center of the claims for TCCs of the claimant-firms, and are the very bases of any TCC issuance or rejection of claims. But while the center may demand these data from the applicant firms, it is mandated by law to keep these data confidential/ These details include financial statements, list of foreign and local buyers and suppliers, income statements, balance sheets, tax returns, and other pertinent details—and revelation to non-DOF parties can make a claimant-firm vulnerable to competition and shakedown, sources explained.

    The code of conduct and ethical standards law requires all public officials to keep secret the confidential information submitted by private entities in the performance of their mandate.

    Other sources said Finance Secretary Gary Teves, harassed by the congressional demands, had given the go-ahead for the release of the database, even though there are no clear guidelines on how to release and use the data contained in the center’s database. This unilateral release could lead to its misuse.

    At a May 13 public hearing called by the House ways and means committee of Rep. Exequiel Javier, Fuentebella reportedly followed up to the committee his motion for submission of the database. This was followed by a letter from the committee secretary, Mauricio Pulhin, asking the DOF-OSS to submit as soon as possible a “soft copy” of the center’s database of transactions for 1998-2008, specifically the issuances and transfers, and status of cases filed against officials and employees of the center.

    The congressional inquiry is apparently premised on allegations that there are “continuing anomalies” in the conduct of operations at the DOF-OSS, similar to the messy setup that made it possible for unscrupulous parties, with connivance from certain center personnel, to carry out the infamous “tax-credit scam” during the Ramos administration that drained the government of an estimated P5 billion to P8 billion from 1994 to 1998.

    Reforms were carried out after then-President Estrada set up a task force in 1998; further reforms were put in place under President Arroyo in late 2003.

    Besides the OSS, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and Bureau of Customs also issue their own TCCs, and finance department sources said the focus is unfairly zeroing in on just the OSS, where reforms had brought down the total amount of tax credits processed annually from a high of P12 billion before the scam was unearthed in 1998 to only P3 billion.

    At the House hearing, Fuentebella reportedly alluded to allegations of serious anomalies but did not provide specifics, prompting fears that the inquiry may become just a “fishing expedition.”

    The inquiry by Javier’s panel was based on the February 6, 2008, Resolution 442 of Fuentebella, directing the House ways and means committee, chaired by Rep. Javier, to conduct an inquiry “in aid of legislation” on the “reported irregularities” on the issuances of TCCs by the DOF-OSS.

    Such anomalies must be stopped, said the resolution, because the cash-strapped government badly needs to plug all revenue leaks to maintain its to fiscal program, especially the 2008 national government total obligation budget of P1.226 trillion.

    It noted how, over the past few years, tax credit irregularities had been “suspected as a major source of revenue leakages, resulting in the loss of billions of pesos in potential revenues.”

    Fuentebella’s resolution added: “Whereas, the assurance of full integrity in the tax credit scheme of the One Stop Shop Tax Credit and Duty Drawback, an office under the Department of Finance, which is mandated to formulate fiscal and financial policies and generate revenues, will provide the best means to national government to achieve a balanced budget without resorting to new tax impositions nor increase on tax rates.”

    In a slide presentation made at the congressional hearing, Hiansen said that based on the official data of the National Tax and Research Center (NTRC), the Philippine government has issued a total of P1,420.19 billion in fiscal incentives to various firms for the period 2001-2006, but the Center has issued TCCs amounting to only P19.19 billion for the same period, or 1.35 percent of the total amount. The rest were issed by BIR and Customs.

    Moreover, while the national government incurred a total budget deficit of P956.26 billion for the entire 2001-2006, the center had issued only TCCs amounting to P19.19 billion, barely 2 percent of the total budget deficit for the same period.

    Still, Hiansen conceded that regardless of the amount, the center should avoid committing any irregularity because its mandate is to prevent the recurrence of any scam in that agency.

    That TCC issuance has dramatically declined from an annual average of P12 billion from 1995 to 1998 to an average of P3 billion indicates that effective safeguards have been installed, according to Hiansen, to prevent any irregularity.

    OTHER STORIES

    Tug of war over DOF database


    Underrecoveries at P8/liter, say oil firms; more price hikes set


    Pippa gets 1st crack at interim open access


    GSIS says it’s reviewing Meralco deals with its IPPs


    Bulk of OFWs now younger–NSO


    Consumers push DOTC, BIR in refund bid for texting fees


    RP aid team will be in Burma for 2 weeks


    CA bars court-directed Mancom at steel firm


    US focuses on crop yields, shelf life


    IFC to launch ‘Doing biz in RP’ report


    ‘Foreign trips essential to solons’ work’