|
THE
Anti-Money Laundering Council is looking at sifting
through the activities of the casinos in the country,
which it said could be used to funnel funds to finance
acts of terrorism.
During
Friday’s Congressional Oversight Committee hearing on
the Anti-Money Laundering Act (Amla), a law passed in
2001, Vicente Aquino, AMLC executive director, said they
are still baffled on how to do the task since the
interagency body’s mandate is limited to the regulatory
agency and not by type of activity.
Aquino
said casino operations are not covered by AMLC’s
scrutiny since the regulation falls under the Philippine
Amusement and Gaming Corp., an agency under the Office
of the President. Pagcor is both a regulator and
operator of a number of gaming facilities in the
country.
The AMLC
only covers those institutions that are either
supervised or regulated by the Bangko Sentral ng
Pilipinas (BSP) for banks and other financial
institutions, by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) for all corporations and by the Insurance
Commission (IC).
“It
should be SEC or BSP (that should regulate casinos),”
Aquino said, but stopped short of saying there should be
amendments in the way casinos are regulated.
“Our
definition of covered institutions is limited to both
regulated or supervised by BSP, SEC or IC, and not by
type of activity,” he said.
On
September 22 to October 6, officials of the
member-countries of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF),
the World Bank-International Monetary Fund, will
evaluate how the AMLC is doing its job of curbing the
activities of money launderers.
The
Paris-based task force has been explicit that Philippine
casinos are potent areas of money laundering, and it
wants a quick plug from council. It has also expressed
impatience with the lack of an effective regulator,
despite the Office of the President having taken over
such responsibility.
Aquino
said they may also change the way the council works—from
covered institutions to type of activity—in order to
meet standards, but this entails certain amendments to
RA 9160, or the Amla.
Another
chink in the council’s armor is that it is not yet clear
if terrorist financing is a criminal act or not based on
the definition of the Human Security Act of 2007, Aquino
admitted.
“It is
our position that the crime of terrorism is already
covered by the act of terrorism…he may not have directly
participated in the commission of the crime, but he
induced others to commit acts of terrorism; his
cooperation is indisposable,” he said.
The
Philippines was first placed in the FATF’s list of
noncooperative countries in 2000 and was only delisted
in February 11, 2005, with a provision that there should
be a plan of action on how to curb money laundering.
The list
is not anymore active since most of the countries tagged
noncompliant have followed the standards. FATF, however,
is making itself relevant and updates its activities
regularly, since the way money is funneled into several
places across the world is evolving.
In case
of another round of sanctions after the FATF review
later this year, the thing immediately at risk is the
$14 billion that expatriate Filipinos remit every year,
but it was not clear how this could be since the
officials did not elaborate.
Sen.
Edgardo Angara, chairman of the Committee on Banks,
Financial Institutions and currencies, said the Office
of the President, through the AMLC, has asked Congress
to amend appropriate provisions in the law to remove the
weaknesses noted by the FATF.
Angara
noted FATF’s concern that Philippine casinos do not form
part of the covered institutions under the Amla.
Money
launderers merely have to walk inside casinos with
millions of dollars in cash, pretend to play for a while
and later walk away with a Pagcor check for deposit
later in an overseas bank in
Hong Kong, the FATF said.
No one
questions a Pagcor check anywhere in the world and the
money launderers have exploited this with impunity,
according to industry sources.
Anti-money laundering officials believe, however,
existing provisions already include casinos among the
so-called covered institution the FATF has complained
about.
But
under Philippine law, the covered institutions only
include those entities supervised by the BSP, the SEC
and the IC, whose heads form the council. The casinos
are not within the ambit of these institutions.
In other
countries, the focus is on the type of activity rather
than on who regulates what institutions, according to
industry sources.
Angara,
meanwhile, prodded officials of the council to
immediately submit to Congress a proposal that would
criminalize terrorist financing and freeze deposits
linked to terrorist activities.
“We
should create a stand-alone law on terrorist financing
to enable [the council] to go after individuals and
entities that finance terrorism and to strengthen the
anti-money laundering legislation,”
Angara said.
The
Senate banks committee,
Angara said, is
committed to provide adequate funding to the AMLC
through the 2009 national budget, a big chunk of which
will be used to hire new analysts and investigators.
(With Jun Vallecera, Butch Fernandez) |