Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador
Escudero,
Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday,
8-10 a.m.
Click here to listen to Karambola.
Estrada has dug own grave,
pro-Arroyo solons say
By Rene Acosta Reporter
THE admission of former President Joseph Estrada that he signed
as “Jose Velarde” further incriminated him in the
plunder case, where the prosecution has accused him of pocketing
P4.1 billion in jueteng payoffs and kickbacks from government
transactions, proadministration congressmen said on Tuesday.
“Deposed President
Estrada’s admission that he signed as ‘Jose Velarde’
was the final nail in his legal coffin that he ironically hammered
down himself,” House majority leader Prospero Nograles and
Nationalist People’s Coalition Rep. Douglas Cagas of Davao
del Sur said in a joint statement.
Both said that instead
of extricating himself from the case, Estrada only burrowed himself
deeper when he confirmed former EquitablePCI Bank vice president
Clarissa Ocampo’s testimony that he signed as “Jose
Velarde” in the bank documents.
Both did not buy the
argument of the former president that he had to sign as “Velarde”
in order to assure his businessmen-friend, William Gatchalian,
would pay his loan to Jaime Dichavez.
In his testimony before
the Sandiganbayan’s Special Division on Wednesday, the former
president said that he was asked by businessman Jaime Dichavez
to own up to the alias in order to ensure that Gatchalian would
pay for his P500 million debt.
“As guarantor,
why did Erap need to use a different name? As a close ally of
Jaime Dichavez, who claims ownership of the Velarde account, why
did Erap have to sign bank documents to guarantee a loan between
two of his cronies?” Cagas asked.
He said that if it was
a personal loan that Estrada was guaranteeing, then Estrada should
have just directed both Gatchalian and Dichaves to reach an understanding
over the loan.
The prosecution said
the Velarde account was opened to serve as depository of Estrada’s
illegal income.
Nograles said that Estrada
was forced to admit his use of the alias because he could not
throw the eyewitness testimonies of Ocampo and Manuel Curato,
who is another former official of the bank.
“His reason for
doing so is shallow and unbelievable, and it escapes human logic.
It’s the case of his hand being caught inside the cookie
jar,” he said of the former president.