By Luo Jun and Michele Batchelor
Bloomberg
HONG KONG—Chris Ruffle, a Shanghai-based fund manager,
won’t buy Bank of China shares when the nation’s No.
2 lender goes public this month. As a Bank of China customer,
he’s all too familiar with the bank’s failings.
“I have my Bank
of China checkbook in Shanghai, but it’s useless everywhere
else,” says Ruffle, 47, who oversees about $1.8 billion
of Chinese stocks at Martin Currie Investment Management Ltd.
“Banks are the weakest part of the Chinese economic system,
so buying into them doesn’t make sense to me.”
Bank of China plans
to raise $9.9 billion in the world’s biggest initial share
sale since 2000, with the stock scheduled to begin trading June
1 in Hong Kong. Ruffle says he won’t invest, even though
international companies such as Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc,
Merrill Lynch & Co. and Temasek Holdings Pte have bought stakes
in the bank.
Investor concerns about
$13 billion of bad loans, repeated fraud investigations and antiquated
computer systems are a reminder that China’s 10-percent
economic growth masks fundamental weaknesses left by decades of
state control over companies and markets.
China’s banks
have yet to overcome a legacy of unchecked lending to state companies
and lax internal controls, even as they court international investors.
The four biggest state-owned lenders still don’t adjust
loan rates based on borrowers’ credit risk, the International
Monetary Fund said in March. They remain burdened with a combined
$137 billion of bad loans, according to government figures.
Royal Bank of Scotland
chief executive Fred Goodwin says potential growth in China’s
banking market outweighs those risks. Britain’s second-biggest
lender joined with Merrill Lynch, the No. 2 US securities firm,
and the Li Ka-shing Foundation to buy 10 percent of Bank of China
for $3.1 billion in July.
“We believe Bank
of China will grow and develop at quite a pace as part of the
wider reforms that are taking place in the financial sector in
China,” Goodwin said in a November interview.
UBS AG, Europe’s
largest bank by assets, and Temasek, the Singapore government’s
investment arm, together own 6.6 percent of Bank of China. Twelve
corporate investors, including Li’s Hutchison Whampoa Ltd.
and Tokyo-based Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., will buy
$2.26 billion of shares in the IPO, according to a sale document
released May 11.
New competition
China’s state banks face unprecedented competition as the
government prepares to fully open the retail banking market in
December, letting overseas lenders such as Citigroup Inc. and
HSBC Holdings Plc open branches nationwide. Smaller domestic rivals
such as Shenzhen-based China Merchants Bank Co., which plans a
$1.7 billion IPO this year, also pose a growing threat.
Bank of China, founded
in 1912 by Sun Yat-sen, known as the father of modern China, held
a monopoly on the nation’s foreign-exchange dealings and
overseas banking from 1949 to 1994.
The bank is China’s
third state-owned lender to sell shares to the public as the government
strives to shore up their capital and improve corporate governance.
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the nation’s largest
lender, plans a $10-billion IPO as soon as September.
Other Chinese bank shares
have surged since their IPOs, helped by falling bad-loan ratios,
rising profits and China’s $1.9-trillion in household savings.
Shares of Bank of Communications
Ltd., China’s fifth-biggest lender, have climbed 81 percent
to HK$5.10 since they debuted in Hong Kong last June. China Construction
Bank, the No. 3 lender, has risen 48 percent to HK$3.48 since
its $9.2-billion October share sale.
The investment banks
arranging Bank of China’s share sale—UBS, Goldman
Sachs Group Inc. and BOC International (Holdings) Ltd., the lender’s
investment banking arm—have already attracted enough demand
to sell all the shares being offered, according to two people
with direct knowledge of the IPO process.
The banks began taking
orders from institutional investors two weeks ago and started
selling shares to individual Hong Kong investors on May 18.
Bank of China is offering
a 10.5-percent stake at HK$2.50 to HK$3 a share, or 1.9 to 2.2
times book value, the sale document says. Bank of Communications
now trades at 2.9 times book value and China Construction Bank
trades at 2.8 times, based on their book values—the market
value of their assets minus their liabilities—at the end
of 2005.
‘Much improvement’
‘This sector is attractive and shows high loan growth,”
says Sebastiaan de Bont, who helps manage the equivalent of $4.2
billion at Robeco Group in Rotterdam. “Of course Chinese
banks aren’t up to American or European standards, but what
I look at are the improvements, and I see much improvement there.”
De Bont owned shares
of China Construction Bank as of February, according to Bloomberg
data. He plans to buy Bank of China shares provided their price-to-book-value
ratio remains lower than those of the other two banks that have
gone public.
While Bank of China
reduced bad loans to 4.9 percent of lending at the end of 2005
from 22 percent two years earlier, that was still higher than
Industrial & Commercial’s 4.4-percent ratio and Construction
Bank’s 3.8 percent.
The government supplied
$22.5 billion of foreign reserves to Bank of China in 2003, allowing
it to set aside more than 200 billion yuan ($25 billion) to cover
delinquent loans. That was part of the $434 billion China has
spent bailing out state-owned lenders since 1998, according to
Moody’s Investors Service.
“You can’t
just throw government money at the banking sector and assume everything’s
going to be OK,” says Rob Subbaraman, a senior economist
at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in Hong Kong. “Neither
restructuring nor IPOs alone will improve business management
or change lending behavior unless accompanied by real institutional
change.”
To pare bad loans, Bank
of China chairman Xiao Gang, who took the post in March 2003,
set up a risk-management system that forces loan approvals to
be reviewed by a central oversight commission, according to the
bank. Previously, individual branches approved loans without supervision
from headquarters.
Xiao, 48, who rarely
appears in public or speaks to the press, previously spent 22
years at China’s central bank, where he was director of
the research bureau and director of the planning and treasury
department. He declined to be interviewed for this story.
Death sentence
Bank of China also is struggling to overcome a legacy of fraud and mismanagement.
A court in northeastern Jilin province
last year gave former Bank of China vice president Liu Jinbao a suspended death
sentence for embezzling 14.48 million yuan. Wang Xuebing, the bank’s president
from 1994 to 2000, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for taking millions of
yuan in bribes and gifts.
Three former managers at a Bank of
China branch in Guangdong province funneled 4 billion yuan into private bank
accounts from 1991 to 2004 in the nation’s biggest bank fraud, laundering
some of the money through Las Vegas, according to a February 1 indictment by
the US Department of Justice.
Bank of China accounted for three-quarters
of the $94 million in fraud linked to bank bills—notes issued by lenders
that promise to pay the holders on demand—that was uncovered at Chinese
banks in the nine months through March, the China Banking Regulatory Commission
said in an April letter to lenders.
“If there are significant scandals
or problems, that demonstrates that there are still issues with internal controls,”
says Wilfred Sit, a fund manager at Baring Asset Management (Asia) Ltd. who
helps manage $3.2 billion, including Construction Bank shares. “You should
factor that into the price.”
Bank of China is clamping down on
fraud and improving the quality of its management, says spokesman Wang Zhaowen.
“The fact that we have made
public disclosures and severely punished the people involved indicates an improvement
of our internal controls,” he says. “We’re aware of weaknesses
in our management and infrastructure at branches outside major cities, and we’re
doing our best to improve that.”
As the nation’s leading foreign-exchange
bank, Bank of China is also more vulnerable than its peers to fluctuations in
the yuan. The bank held a net $39 billion of foreign currency as of December
31. The value of those holdings may drop by 4.3 billion yuan this year as the
government lets the yuan strengthen, Zurich-based UBS said in a May 3 report.
“Bank of China’s net foreign-exchange
position is too large,” says Lin Xiao, who helps oversee the $40 million
Golden China Fund for Greenwoods Asset Management Co. in Shanghai. “This
is a soft spot and really concerns us.”
Service glitches
Lin says he won’t buy Bank of China shares unless they’re priced
at 2 times book value or less.
The lender’s international exposure
also works to its advantage, boosting overseas earnings and reducing its reliance
on loans to state companies. Bank of China has more than 560 overseas branches
in 25 countries, including the US, the UK, Japan and Australia. The bank’s
international network is about five times larger than Industrial and Commercial
Bank’s.
So far, more than $5 billion of overseas
investments in Bank of China have done little to improve service for customers
such as Ruffle at Martin Currie. The firm’s Absolute Return China Fund
has gained 44 percent this year, making it the best performer among 27 China
hedge funds tracked by Bloomberg.
As a Shanghai-based customer, Ruffle
can’t cash checks or withdraw money at Bank of China branches in Beijing—or
any other city—because the bank lacks a central computer system. It takes
two to three business days to transfer money from a Bank of China branch in
Shanghai to one in Beijing, according to the bank’s web site.
Those weaknesses are typical of a
Chinese banking system that’s still more broken than fixed, Ruffle says.
“They’re doing the right
thing to list and bring in foreign investors, but they’ve got a long,
long way to go,” he says. “I don’t really want to give my
money to help them do it.”
|