The 2006 budget: toward
fiscal responsibility, beyond rhetoric
The Entrepreneur
Manny Villar
This is the second part of my sponsorship speech on the national
budget which I delivered, as chairman of the Senate Committee
on Finance, on May 22.
House Bill 4710
It was only on the eve
of the adjournment of sessions for the Lenten break last month
that the House of Representatives transmitted General Appropriations
Bill 4710 to the Senate.
Under the House-approved
budget, the allocation for the programmed and unprogrammed funds,
amounting to P676.9 billion and P57.1 billion, respectively, remain
the same as the President’s proposal, although there were
certain changes made within. As a result of several additions,
reductions and realignments, a net amount of P823 million was
deducted by the House on the proposed appropriations of several
departments/agencies.
Although the total allocation
for unprogrammed fund remains at P57.1 billion, the allocation
for unprogrammed foreign-assisted projects were redistributed
ay realigning P300 million for personal services and P500 million
for MOOE to capital outlays. The projects that were cut from the
DPWH were also transferred to the unprogrammed fund for standby
funding.
The Senate version
After examining the budget with a
fine-toothed comb during the six-month period set aside for the Committee of
the Whole sessions, we have come up with our proposed amendments to the House
bill.
Our amendments, Mr. President, yielded
an increase of P4,428,467,000 and a decrease of P35,542,726,000 resulting to
a net cut of P31,114,259,000. As per the Senate version, the amended totals
are as follows:
The following are some of the highlights
of the Senate amendments:
• Increase of P100 million under
the University of the Philippines System for the implementation of free college
education scholarship programs
• Increase of P300 million under
the Department of Health for the implementation of free medical and dental assistance
programs to indigent patients, and P50 million for information and education
campaign on breastfeeding
• Increase of P100 million under
the Commission on Higher Education for the implementation of free college education
scholarship programs
• Increase of P50 million under
the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Program for the Young Farmers Program
• Cut of P2.721 billion from
airports and navigational facilities under the Department of Transportation
and Communications
• Cut of P65.534 million from
the Presidential Commission on Good Government
• Deletion of the P13.1-billion
Compensation Adjustment Fund in view of the fact that the bill for this purpose
has already been passed by both Houses of Congress and is awaiting a bicameral
conference.
• Deletion of P10 billion for
the incentive package for employees availing themselves of the Rationalization
Program under the Pension and Gratuity Fund because as per consultations with
agencies, the rationalization program has not taken off this year.
• Deletion of the Kilos Asenso
Support Fund
• Deletion of the Kalayaan Barangay
Program Fund
Some of the proposed Special and General Provisions consist of the following:
• Department of Energy: Special
Provision No. 1 on the Use of Income is amended by deleting the proviso specifying
that the earmarked revenue of P884.493 million for local government units intended
for various projects shall be subject to the recommendation of the LGU and the
representatives of the legislative districts concerned.
• Energy Regulatory Commission:
Delete the new Special Provision No. 1 on the Use of Income.
• Priority Development Assistance
Fund: Amendment of Special Provision No. 1 on the Use and Release of the fund,
deleting the proviso earmarking P300 million in seed money for the Kalinga Pilipinas
Congressional District Housing Program at P5 million per district.
• Commission on Elections: Amendment
of Special Provision No. 2 on Election Modernization, by adding the requirement
that “the procurement of machines, devices, equipment and software for
the automation of elections shall be consistent with the decision of the Supreme
Court in the case of Information Technology Foundation, et al. vs. Comelec,
and that the provisions of RA 9184 shall be strictly complied with.
• New General Provision requiring
all agencies with special accounts to submit quarterly reports to the Senate
Committee on Finance, the House Committee on Appropriations, and to the DBM
• New General Provision on the
Establishment of Regulatory Audit Team for all departments, bureaus and offices
to determine rules and regulations that are duplicative or overlapping in nature,
obsolete or unnecessary, and to submit the same to the Senate Committee on Finance
and the House Committee on Appropriations.
• New General Provision requiring
the DBM to submit to the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committee
on Appropriations quarterly reports of the releases from the Special Purpose
Lump-sum Funds.
In closing, Mr. President, allow me
to emphasize that what we seek to enact is a responsible and prudent budget,
one that is concerned with quantity as well as quality of spending. Let us strive
for budget discipline because there is no such thing as a free lunch . . . but
there is such a thing as passing the bill on to the next generation. Let us
keep in mind that fiscal responsibility entails having the right spending priorities,
so that if additional revenues can sustain a much bigger budget, the extra layers
of fat are added where they will lead to fiscal health and not to an obese budget,
thus boosting the economic well-being of the nation.
The budget is too important a financial
document to be trifled with. In a country where 26.5 million Filipinos or more
than one-third of the country’s population live below the poverty line,
enacting a fiscally responsible budget that will truly help uplift living conditions
by moving the economy forward is a political legacy that the Senate, as a hallowed
institution, will be immensely proud to bequeath to the Filipino people.
|