HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • 3 sectors seek most patent protection
     
    By Alma Anonas-Carpio
    Correspondent

    EVEN as patent filings continue to be low in the Philippines—indicating either lack of vitality or interest in innovation—an international intellectual-property (IP) expert said Wednesday that telecommunications, information technology (IT) and pharmaceuticals dominated the list of patent-protection seekers last year.

    At the First National Conference on IP and Technology Commercialization in Makati City, senior program officer Jared Nyagua of the World Intellectual Property Organization (Wipo) said these industries make up about 30 percent of the protected and commercialized technologies in the world—telecommunications accounts for 10.5 percent; IT, 10.1 percent; and the pharmaceutical industry, 9.3 percent.

    That the Philippines is lacking in innovation may not be surprising, since the conference was also told that nuclear engineering and telecommunications are the fastest-growing areas of technology and innovation, both of which are still very much in their infancy if not totally absent—as in nuclear—in the country.

    But IP Philippines Director General Adrian Cristobal Jr. said this could be changed to a Philippines active in invention through a change of mindset into a “patent and profit” attitude.

    “The prevailing culture among universities and public RDI is ‘publish or perish’. The challenge now is to move from the accepted tradition of publication to the actual commercialization of their work. The sector can contribute considerably to the country’s economic development if it builds a culture of commercialization,” urged Cristobal.

    The meeting was organized by the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines and the Commission on Higher Education in an effort to spark interest in innovation and spread awareness about intellectual-property protection in the Philippines.

    Cristobal cautioned that publication of scientific findings and similar pieces on technology does not secure the intellectual-property rights of the innovator who develops that technology: “Once a study is published, the [innovator] has one year within which to actively develop and patent the technology” before the published work becomes part of the public domain and anybody who can access the published report can exploit the technology without the study author’s consent.

    While the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines is “one of the most advanced” IP codes in the world—the Philippines is Wipo-compliant and our IP regime is of international standards—Cristobal lamented a severe “lack of awareness” of the benefits and procedures for IP protection through patenting and copyright protection.

    He underlined the fact that investors confronted with new technology now invariably ask, “Who owns that intellectual property or technology?” This question must be answered in order to attract investments and promote national growth “through innovation,” stressed Cristobal.

    “We have a lot of work to do here. We have been reaching out to several sectors through seminars, trade fairs, link-ups with associations and chambers of commerce for more awareness and information on patents and trademarks.”

    In the same two-day conference in Makati that opened Wednesday, Wipo’s Nyagua said in his presentation: “Creation and protection of IP assets may entail investments at the outset but there are rewards. The United States, for instance, spends about $200 billion in research and development annually. However, it also has the most number of filings in the Patent Cooperation Treaty [PCT] at 53,147 out of the total 158,400 international applications in 2007.”

    Other countries showing much energy in innovation after the US include Japan (27,732 applications), Germany (17,889), and France (6,523).

    According to Naygua, North East Asian countries account for 25.4 percent of PCT filings over four consecutive years from 2004 to 2007, with China and Japan among the top 10 countries in the region to post high volumes of PCT filings.

    Three companies in the region made it to the list of firms leading PCT filings last year—Matsushita (Japan), Huawei Technologies (China), and Toyota (Japan). 

    Cristobal said in his opening address that patent filings are indicators of a nation’s economic, innovative and technological development; and noted that patent filings are low in the country, which has consistently occupied a low rank in global surveys on innovation. “Patent reform must be carried out in pursuit of the country’s economic development. Patent reform will be in the form of increased patent filing count and commercialization of inventions.”

    OTHER STORIES

    Cabinet OK’s interim open access


    ‘Keep VAT on oil, but use P17-B windfall for people’


    Power rates study group sets 1st meet


    UPS to transfer Clark operations to China


    DOTC floats free SMS; telcos protest


    Now, it’s ‘Asean open skies’


    HP unveils product for storing big data


    GMA pushes Asean rice security bloc


    SC asked: void JMSU


    3 sectors seek most patent protection