|
IF
discussions on the wage hike were not done in May,
workers would have benefited more and even would have
had a shot at increasing wages to as much as P50 per
day.
A
government official admitted to the BusinessMirror that
the discussion on the wage issue was premature and was
only brought about by panic due to high rice prices.
“It was
too early [discussions on wages]. If they just allowed
us to have the discussions in August, which is the time
when wage hikes are done, the workers would have
benefited more,” the official said.
The
official, who asked not to be named, explained that if
the August round of negotiations were done, more factors
other than rice prices would have been factored in and
workers would have been able to have a better chance of
haggling for a higher pay increase.
Some of
these factors include the latest transport hike and
possible increases in inflation that could be a better
leverage in the negotiations that would have been done
more in the favor of workers.
“It’s
turning out that this P20 wage hike is more advantageous
for employers because negotiations were premature.
Timing is really very important,” the official said.
Unfortunately, the official said that with the P20 wage
hike, there is no more chance for workers to bargain
again for a higher pay, unless a severe and untoward
event in the succeeding quarters warrants another
discussion this year.
Meanwhile, University of the
Philippines
economist Benjamin Diokno agreed with the government
official and said that with higher transport fares, the
government should revisit the wage increase.
Diokno
added that with oil prices now at around $127 per barrel
and no prospects of going down, there is even more
reason for the government to rethink the wage hike.
He added
that, in fact, the government should not even be
involved in wage setting, all the more reason why the
wage increase must be revisited.
“I don’t
think the government should be in the business of
setting wages. The role of the government is [to] create
the environment for strong growth that would create jobs
and invest in human capital,” Diokno said.
“Government representative in wage board didn’t
negotiate in good faith. Proposed wage increase has to
be revisited,” he added.
On the
other hand, economist and chairman of the
nongovernmental organization Minimal Government
Bienvenido Oplas Jr. said that while the wage hike could
help consumers get “immediate relief” from high
commodity prices, the best solution for minimum-wage
earners is still an income-tax reprieve.
Oplas
said while Congress has yet to pass the exemption of
minimum-wage earners from paying tax, a tax reprieve may
be done through an executive order (EO) issued by the
President.
Through
the EO, Malacañang can suspend the income-tax payment of
minimum-wage earners for around four to five months,
removing significant pressure on their shrinking
budgets.
“Malacañang only wants employers to bear the costs of
relieving the minimum-wage workers but it doesn’t want
to take its share of small revenue loss,” Oplas said.
Earlier,
National Economic and Development Authority (Neda)
Acting Director General Augusto Santos said the separate
boards of the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS)
and the Social Security System (SSS) are studying the
possibility of condoning loan penalties.
The
condonation of fees would mean that around 1.4 million
GSIS members and 27.75 million SSS members will be
spared from loan surcharges, Santos said.
If the
GSIS and SSS will approve the condonation of penalties
or the surcharges paid by members for unpaid loans, no
matter how small the amount is, will be a significant
help especially for minimum-wage earners who are already
having a difficult time making ends meet.
Apart
from these measures, the government is also open to
support a decrease in corporate income tax to 25 percent
from 35 percent. This measure is still pending in
Congress.
Further,
the law exempting minimum-wage earners from paying their
income tax, which would play significant roles in
helping Filipinos cope with high prices, has already
been approved for third hearing in Congress. |