|
Before,
it was a bold, “If you like it, you buy it!” Now it’s an
entirely different tune, like they won’t give up the
Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) without a fight.
Nobody
wants to give up the gravy or the goose that lays the
golden egg. If they meant what they first said, I would
be wondering what surprises they have up their sleeves.
It’s
simply out of character for a businessman to just give
up a highly profitable enterprise. But the question here
is not really who owns Meralco or who wants to run it;
or whether it is run like a well-oiled machine or used
like a prostitute.
The
issues here are not simply limited to how the government
makes profits on its investments, but more on matters of
humanitarian concern. Is it a humane policy of Meralco
to fleece its own customer base from whom it owes its
business? Or its own stockholders? Or its own creditors?
Then collect billions in VAT when the transaction is
VAT-exempt?
****
Now
comes this revelation from a congressman from Camarines
Sur who accused Meralco of “ghost delivery.” It appears
that sometime in 2000, First Gas, a Meralco sister
company, billed Meralco for the delivery of some 1,000
megawatts which Meralco, in turn, charged its customers.
However,
later scrutiny revealed that First Gas has a capacity of
only 300 megawatts, at most, for the period in question,
from which transaction Meralco earned as much as P3.3
billion, according to the congressman.
****
The
controversy has bared a litany of shameful business
practices that Meralco should explain because it is, in
part, a publicly owned utility company, and my God! It
owes the public a lot of explanations.
An
advertisement in the papers is not enough. Meralco
should face the public and the government to whom it
owes much of its existence.
****
I’m
wondering why there are as many versions of “The Lord’s
Prayer” in as many Catholic churches, and even
variations of the lyrics which often result in the choir
not able to follow when a new version is sung.
I think
that there should be a common music set to the “Ama
Namin” and “The Lord’s Prayer,” which would be easy for
the faithful to learn by heart because they are already
familiar with the lyrics. We don’t need so many
versions.
This
prayer has been handed down to us from centuries, when
Christ first taught his disciples how to pray.
Introducing so many variations in the music only
confuses the parishioner. Let’s harmonize.
****
Just
asking: Why is it that so many vacant properties carry
the sign, “Private Property Not For Sale.” If these
properties are not for sale, why do the owners advertise
it?
I can’t
see the logic other than to assume that what they want
to say is “No Trespassing.” Or is it because the owners
want to draw the attention of passersby to the property
because they really want to sell it? Reverse psychology?
****
Mayor
Fred Lim, who became well- known for his motto, “The law
applies to all, or to none at all,” deserves our
congratulations because it appears he did not interfere
when his son was apprehended for violating the antidrugs
law.
I am
sure it was a heartache for the mayor when his son, said
to be his favorite, in fact, was caught in such
circumstances.
To the
credit of the good mayor, he left his son to his own
devices to face the music until the son was able to post
bail, which was already a judgment call for the courts.
I am
sure a lot of people are taking notice of this. We
should have more public officials like Mayor Lim.
****
I wonder
why they are making so much fuss of this new revelation
of Vice Gov. Rolex Suplico about the golf game in
Shenzhen,
China.
And now, my Kumadre Gina de Venecia is trying to
fire her own misguided missile by attributing sinister
connotations for the supposed meeting with Chinese
personalities after the golf game.
Mrs. de
Venecia seems to complain why she was not included in
the meeting, and yet she admits that her husband,
then-Speaker Joe de Venecia, was in that meeting.
If there
was something so secret and mysterious about that
meeting, surely JDV would have known everything that was
discussed. Notwithstanding the many broadsides the
former Speaker delivered against Malacañang, JDV never
said anything derogatory regarding that meeting; unless
the good Speaker himself was pari delicto? |