|
That
reduced power rates, stable rice prices and, yes,
increased government revenues are on top of the Arroyo
administration’s agenda serves to underscore the fact
that it is bent on resolving the real, hard issues
affecting our people, unlike some legislators and their
self-styled “pro-people” cohorts who cannot seem to
accept that the nation has moved on and has had enough
of their contrived “search for truth” crusade centered
on the NBN-ZTE inquiry.
There is
a limit to harangues and public torturing on this issue,
and we have reached that point. So if the critics insist
in fixing the blame, not the solution to this and other
pressing issues, then they should be exposed and made
accountable for their deeds.
Which is
why some quarters are at a loss why the Palace seems to
suggest that touting ex-justice secretary Silvestre
Bello III’s appointment as Cabinet secretary is a
welcome move after the guy spent time in various senior
positions with hardly anything to show for it, except
that still-unexplained involvement in the celebrated
“Nine Little Indians” caper.
There
are better stories out of the Palace than this. But we
will really have to deal with Bello and his capers soon.
We are told that immediately after his designation, his
“boys” have been calling up people signaling that they
are back. Tsk. . . Tsk. . . .
Power-rate adjustment and the Epira
Meantime, it is well that President Arroyo has accepted
the invitation of the Lopez family, led by Manila
Electric Co. (Meralco) chairman and CEO Manuel “Manolo”
Lopez, to discuss the controversy which has embroiled
senior government officials, headed by Government
Service Insurance System (GSIS) president Winston
Garcia, and the country’s largest power-distribution
utility.
That
meeting should finally put to rest allegations that the
government is out to punish the Lopezes for their media
affiliate’s seemingly unreconstructed harangues against
the present administration and focus on the real issue
at hand—the need to reduce power rates across-the-board.
Hopefully, this face-to-face encounter will also calm
the waters and lead not only to reduced power rates soon
but a fuller understanding by all concerned about the
real, not skewed, issues bedeviling the power industry.
For,
truth to tell, getting Meralco to clean its act is just
one, though a big, part of the total solution to our
worsening power situation. For one, the company will now
have to explain why it continues to “pass on” a number
of charges such as utility bills that other companies
consider operating costs, and why its “system losses”
still hover around the maximum 9.5 percent allowable by
law after all these years.
It will
also have to justify its procurement policy which
critics claim is skewed in favor of the Lopez affiliates
in a kind of “self-dealing” workout, to the detriment of
consumers and other shareholders like the GSIS.
It will
also have to open its books if only to show that it has
paid for all the shares and assets which it took over
after Edsa 1, and explain how properties such as
Rockwell are carried in its accounts. It will also have
to show that it is not overstaffed, or worse, is
outsourcing work to other Lopez affiliates, to the
detriment of the public and other stakeholders.
In a
word, this latest public outcry should be taken by the
Lopezes as a means to show once and for all that Meralco
is not only being managed well, but that it has retained
its soul as the country’s largest power-distribution
utility.
That
openness, if we may call it such, to accountability
should apply to the other big industry players such as
the National Power Corp. (Napocor), National
Transmission Corp. and Shell Gas and, of course, the
industry regulator Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC).
It is
the proper and responsible interplay of these entities
in a well-developed and ethically responsive environment
which will result in the long term in reduced and
competitive power rates.
Napocor
president Cyril del Callar, for example, will now have
to show proof that he did not openly defy the rules in
reportedly awarding a P956-million coal-supply contract
to a three-month old company called Transpacific
Consolidated Resources, whose paid-up capital is a
princely P62,500.
He will
also have to tell Bayan Muna Party-list Rep. Teddy
Casiño why he has been buying coal at $109/metric ton
(MT) when others were said to have bought theirs at
$64/MT only.
He will
also have to belie persistent reports that he has been
secretly meeting with his old mentor, ex-senator Sonny
Osmeña, a known backer of the Cebu-based Aboitizes, not
so much as to find ways to reduce rates but to exchange
notes on, among others, Meralco’s operations.
Those
meetings, if true, coupled with the bulldog
determination of GSIS president Garcia to wager the P9
billion and counting pension funds of government
employees already invested in the utility to “replace
the Lopez management,” has only fueled rumors that
reducing the power rates is just part of the bigger
agenda.
Quite
apart from these groups, it is the ERC and Congress
which should now show proof that they have been true to
their mandate as the guardian of consumers’ welfare.
After
being shown all the deficiencies of the law and the
seeming inutility of the regulators to effect meaningful
changes in the power equation, it behooves the leaders
of these institutions to come around and support
Malacañang’s call for sustained and meaningful
adjustments. They should not stop at the changing of the
guards, even, if ever, that comes to pass in Meralco,
but in insuring the Electric Power Industry Reform Act
is amended to incorporate the more progressive notions
for the sustained development of the power sector.
If these
changes push through and the EnerCon program gets into
high gear, there is no reason why we cannot expect
better and more affordable power in the years to come.
And now
to the rice issue
The
signing of a memorandum of agreement between the
Department of Agriculture (DA) and the League of
Provinces of the Philippines, whereby especially
trained, local government unit-devolved agri-services
personnel will be detailed with the DA for years 2008 to
2010, or what the Palace calls the “crash
rice-sufficiency plan period,” augurs well for our
efforts to attain a more comfortable level of rice
production which can shield us from the vagaries of the
global grains market.
This
initiative, which I understand is just part of the total
FIELDS program, meant to address long-standing problems
in the rice and grains sectors, has been hailed by no
less than the International Rice Research Institute’s
Robert Zeigler, who intoned that the country has “. . .
adopted technologies quite effectively and used them
rather well. . . ,” and even by the Rome-based UN Fund
for Agricultural Development’s Kevin Cleaver, who
advised during an earlier visit to Manila that the rice
problem “could be handled pretty well by the Philippines
in the immediate and long term” with the measures put in
place by the Arroyo administration.
Indeed,
these initiatives have exempted us from being listed by
the UN World Food Program among the group of 36
countries considered suffering from the “silent tsunami”
of rising rice and food prices which will need
assistance for being “food insecure.”
As a
recent The Economist magazine article noted, governments
can provide basic technology: executing
capital-intensive irrigation projects too large for poor
individual farmers to undertake; or paying for basic
science that helps produce high yielding seeds. Among
others, these are what the FIELDS program hopes to
achieve. |