|
SAYING
that it will greatly relieve many Filipinos who can
hardly cope with the rising cost of food and fuel, the
House of Representatives may take action to suspend the
application of the 12-percent expanded value-added tax
(E-VAT) on the electric charges of residential consumers
whose bills do not exceed P5,000 a month.
Speaker
Prospero Nograles asked the House Committee on Energy
led by Lakas Rep. Mikey Arroyo of Pampanga to study the
move and its impact on the economy.
“The
high cost of food and fuel is already too much to bear
for many of our countrymen. I think that there is now a
need to consider lifting the E-VAT on electricity for
residential consumers who have an average electric bill
of P5,000 and below,” Nograles said.
He said
buck passing on who is responsible for the high cost of
energy will not help improve the lives of Filipinos and
the only way to provide them relief is to discover ways
and means on how to reduce their economic burden in the
face of the spiraling cost of food and fuel.
He added
the controversial “system loss” charges being imposed by
power distribution companies should be also reviewed and
the possibility of putting a cap on the amount being
charged from the consumers should be seriously
considered.
“System
losses charged to consumers, although practiced
worldwide, should be revisited and amended to a most
reasonable basis and must have a cap. It can’t be
open-ended,” he said.
Besides
providing economic relief to millions of Filipinos,
Nograles said suspending the E-VAT on electricity for
ordinary residential consumers will greatly help in the
government’s campaign to conserve energy and minimize
greenhouse emissions from power plants.
“Lifting
the E-VAT can be like an incentive to those who save
energy. It’s also good for the environment if we can
greatly reduce our overall power consumption,” he said.
Nograles
said that his proposal to lift the E-VAT on electricity
for residential users can be
applied temporarily until the cost of fuel in the world
market becomes stable, or it can be adopted as a
permanent government policy if it will not have
crippling effects on the economy.
Relatedly, Lakas Rep. Exequiel Javier of Antique has
filed House Bill 3440, seeking to exempt poor families
from E-VAT on electricity.
Javier
said that customers with an average monthly consumption
of zero to 50 kilowatt-hour (kWh) a month should get
50-percent discount on their electricity bill.
Those
who use an average of 51 to 70 kWh a month will be given
35-percent discount, while those who consume 71 to 100
kWh monthly will get a 20-percent discount, Javier said.
Kabalikat ng Malayang Pilipino Rep. Luis Villafuerte of
Camarines Sur, vice chairman of the House energy
committee, meanwhile, accused Meralco and First Gas
Holdings of peddling another “blatant and unexpurgated
lie” that First Gas’s 1,000-MW Santa Rita plant was
fully operational in 2000 and 2001 and Meralco had to
pay full capacity charges because the National Power
Corp. (Napocor) failed to deliver the agreed
transmission-line facilities.
He said
that resorting to peddling falsehoods and issuing
misleading statements cannot cover up or belie what are
contained in Meralco’s own documents that the Lopez
family owned IPP, First Gas, did not deliver the
corresponding electricity to Meralco in the 2001 but was
nonetheless paid by Meralco an average of P1.08 billion
a month for full capacity fees and fixed expenses
equivalent to 1,000 MW.
“Meralco
blamed the state-owned National Power Corp. for its
failure to provide the transmission lines needed to
transport power from the First Gas plant” according to
First Gas executive vice president Richard Tantoco.
Villafuerte, however, said he has Energy Regulatory
Commission documents showing that Meralco and First Gas
Power did not really have a firm transmission line
agreement with the Transco or the National Transmission
Corp., the power transmission services monopoly that was
spun off from Napocor.
Because
it only had a “No Firm Transmission Service Agreement”
First Gas therefore had no contractual right to expect
the availability of such transmission facilities and
Meralco had no business paying its sister company P1.08
billion a month for power it was not delivering,
Villafuerte said. |