|
In a
number of ways, the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco)
reminds us of Rameses II, described in the Old Testament
as the most oppressive pharaoh (or god-king) Ancient
Egypt ever had. By analogy, we Meralco costumers are
Rameses II’s oppressed Hebrew slaves, yearning for
deliverance, hoping to stage our own exodus from the
present untenable situation of exorbitantly high power
rates.
We have
had to put up with it for too long. The lives of
thousands of Hebrew slaves were sacrificed in the
construction of the pyramids, the ornate tombs of
Egyptian royalty. We are not much different because we
are made to pay onerous power rates for the greater
glory and strength of the Lopez financial empire.
Meanwhile, the endless rate increases imposed by Meralco
come like lacerating whiplashes on our tired,
overburdened backs. But now, at least, we have reason to
hope Meralco will soon be getting its comeuppance.
But
enough of the biblical allusion. Executives of GMA 7,
the rival television network of the Lopez-owned ABS-CBN,
are now wondering if ABS-CBN has not been paying for its
huge power consumption, being a sister company of
Meralco. If so, can the management of ABS-CBN, headed by
Eugenio “Gabby” Lopez III, show proof it has been paying
for its power bill? If, indeed, ABS-CBN (where the
air-conditioners are on 24/7) doesn’t worry about power
costs, it’s downright unfair for GMA 7, which has to
deal with escalating overhead expenses.
Meralco
executives, under intense questioning by Sen. Juan Ponce
Enrile, reluctantly admitted during a hearing called by
the Joint Congressional Power Commission (JCPC) Monday
this week that Meralco itself consumes a total of 72
million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity a year.
Worth close to P500 million, the cost of this power
consumption is passed on by Meralco to its customers.
This
damning admission has made everybody wonder whether or
not the power bills of 15 Lopez-owned Meralco
subsidiaries and sister companies—including media giants
ABS-CBN and Bayantel—are being paid for by the public,
as well.
How
Enrile was able to elicit this damning admission was a
fine demonstration of his skill as a trial lawyer. He
first got the Meralco consumption figure from Jesus
Francisco, Meralco president. He then turned to a
Meralco subordinate and asked whether Meralco’s power
consumption is being chalked up as a system loss. The
subordinate’s answer: No, not as a system loss, but
charged to Meralco customers just the same under a
different nomenclature. He said Meralco customers have
been paying for Meralco’s own power bills ever since at
P5.70 per kWh.
Winston
Garcia, president-general manager of the Government
Service Insurance System, buried Meralco deeper by
pointing out that Meralco should not only be paying for
the electricity it uses, but should also be paying the
commercial rate of P8 per kWh. Meralco is a commercial
enterprise that exists for profit. With no power bills
to worry about, no wonder Meralco has posted a
60-percent increase in revenue in the first quarter of
the year, Garcia said.
Sen.
Miriam Defensor Santiago, JCPC chair, also scored a
point when she drew out the admission that Meralco buys
power from the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM)
during peak hours when prices are naturally high, while
it sources its power from the Lopez-owned independent
power producers (IPPs) during non-peak hours. She said
there may be an effort to show that Lopez-owned IPPs
sell power at rates cheaper than those it procures from
the National Power Corp. and WESM.
Meralco’s dealings with its own IPPs become a big issue
when it comes to lowering power rates. Garcia said this
was why he was demanding copies of all Meralco contracts
with the Lopez-owned IPPs. Transparency is of the utmost
importance, he said.
Transparency would be essential in determining where and
how much Meralco is sourcing not only electricity, but
also its meters, transformers, wires, etc. There should
also be transparency in its collection of electric bills
from its sister companies; transparency in all the
contracts entered into by Meralco, including insurance
agreements with what is suspected to be a bogus
insurance firm based in the Bahamas.
Garcia
says he intends to make the Lopezes fully accountable to
Meralco shareholders and customers. “They must be made
accountable to the fullest intent of the law,” he adds.
Garcia
is not exactly the prophet Moses imbued with miraculous
powers to part the Red Sea so we, captive Meralco
customers, can pass through to safety. But he certainly
has what it takes to shake up the Meralco corporate
structure to its rafters.
And,
just the other day, another champion of Meralco
customers emerged, this time in the House of
Representatives, in the person of Camarines Sur Rep.
Luis Villafuerte. In a scathing privileged speech,
Villafuerte offered documentary evidence that
something’s very wrong with those contracts between
Meralco and the Lopez-owned IPPs.
Villafuerte railed against “ghost deliveries” worth
P1.08 billion a month from the Lopez-owned First Gas
Power to Meralco, fictitious deliveries that were all
charged to Meralco customers from December 2000 to
November 2001.
The
interesting details of the Villafuerte exposé—plus the
denial by the Lopez side, to be fair—would best be the
subject of my next column.
Omerta_bdc@yahoo.com |