|
DECRYING
the incomparable costs of living against the increase in
cost of basic commodities and utilities, militant group
Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) urged Thursday the
scrapping of “unjust charges” to reduce power rates.
In a statement, Bayan recommended that
the value-added tax (VAT) on generation, transmission
and distribution, and the separate system-loss charge be
removed from the electric bill of all power consu-mers
nationwide.
The militant group described these
charges as “an unfair burden on consumers.”
Bayan said removing the system- losses
charge and the VAT on power will result in a rate
reduction of P1.42 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for Manila
Electric Co. (Meralco) customers, and that other
electricity consumers nationwide are expected to receive
significant rate reductions as well.
Bayan and People Opposed to Warrantless
Electricity Rates (Power) demanded the government to
stop collecting the VAT on system losses, lifeline
subsidies and franchise taxes and for previous
collections to be refunded to consumers.
Bayan and Power said these charges are
“patently unjust and outrageous from the onset,” and
that there is already an emerging consensus between the
power industry, administration and opposition lawmakers
and consumer groups that the VAT should not be applied
to system losses and lifeline subsidies.
Systems losses should not be VAT-able
because, by its nature, system losses are electricity
lost for various reasons.
Lifeline subsidy rates, on the other
hand, are paid for by consumers subsidizing other
consumers and are considered revenue neutral. Franchise
taxes, on the other hand, are revenues going to the
government and should not be taxed again with the VAT.
“Even if the VAT on power is not yet
repealed, the national government can already move to
lower rates by removing the VAT on system losses,
lifeline subsidies and franchise taxes, and by refunding
the VAT on these items collected since 2006,” Renato
Reyes Jr., Bayan secretary-general, said.
Power has estimated that the VAT on
system losses alone, an item that represents technical
losses and pilfered electricity, will reach more than
P3.4 billion since 2006.
“The Bureau of Internal Revenue and the
Department of Finance can already make adjustments that
will benefit consumers. Our only problem now is
Malacañang, which is adamantly against the removal of
the VAT on power,” Reyes added.
As for the state-owned National Power
Corp. (Napocor), the protes-ters are demanding an
immediate refund of Napocor’s overrecoveries from 2006
up to the present, which the Energy Regulatory
Commission (ERC) estimates is at P10 billion.
Bayan and Power also suggested the
rejection of the P14 billion Napocor-Meralco settlement,
which aims to pass on bad debts to consumers.
The two groups also encourage the
rejection of the Napocor-Power Sector Assets and
Liabilities Management Corp. petition that allows the
recovery of P9 billion in generation charges that
resulted from Napocor’s “market power abuse” in the
Wholesale Electricty Spot Market from August to November
2006. This petition is currently pending before the ERC.
Bayan said stricter regulation and
monitoring of Napocor fuel procurements to prevent
overpriced emergency coal purchases, which raise
generation rates, should be in place.
Bayan emphasized the need to review all
independent power producer contracts of Napocor and
other distribution utilities and disallowing take-or-pay
provisions that are usually disadvantageous to
consumers.
“There is also a need to scrap the
Electric Power Industry Reform Act and an immediate
stop to the deregulation and privatization of the power
sector in favor of a more regulated environment where
rates can be thoroughly scrutinized,” Bayan said. |