|
Hogging
prime media space is the battle royale between top
Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) honcho
Winston Garcia and the Lopezes of the utility giant
Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) and which are now being
viewed with mixed feelings by stock- market aficionados,
housewives, market investors, pension funds and
electricity consumers.
There
have been side issues as well that have been engendered
by the ongoing media war, ranging from the National
Power Corp. (Napocor) subsidy that President Arroyo has
announced to the system losses.
With
Garcia’s call for full transparency in Meralco’s
business affairs arising from its huge investment in
Meralco, the GSIS president has sought access to
Meralco’s documents, including the contracts it entered
into and how it bills its customers. Apparently
unappeased even on the issue of returns on their
investments, can anyone blame Garcia for seeing red
these days over what he colorfully described as
Meralco’s treatment of its investors and customers as
“dirt rags”?
“The
fight for full transparency and good corporate
governance in Meralco,” according to Garcia, is to stop
GSIS members from receiving a double black eye—the
mismanagement of their investments in Meralco and being
made to pay questionably high electricity as Meralco
customers. He stressed that the GSIS is ready to hale
Meralco to court if only to set light on and correct
what he claimed to be several questionable practices,
such as the 58 centavos per kilowatt-hour collected by
Meralco from its customers as “system-loss charge” to
cover claimed pilferage and heat losses.
This
system-loss charge is unfair to all Meralco customers,
as they are made to pay for electricity allegedly stolen
by other people. They are also tasked to pay for
electricity lost due to the incompetence and
inefficiency of Meralco in distributing power. The
prevailing public perception is that Meralco is neither
cracking down on pilferage nor plugging distribution
leakages so it can justify continuously charging its
customers with this abominable system-loss charge, the
GSIS president said.
The
latest fusillade to come from Garcia concerns dividends
that Meralco pays out, which were made once over a
five-year period until 2007. As a pension fund, the GSIS
has to see to it that it gets the best returns. This
was, however, disputed by Meralco, citing the inability
of the utility firm to get its rate adjustments. Here
the blame is put squarely on overregulation of the
industry.
How the
ongoing media spectacle shapes out continues to mystify.
But what is good about the whole affair is that it
highlights various side issues borne by the controversy.
One, as we pointed out in our earlier column, is the
question of the huge royalty tax that the government
imposes on the natural gas that flows out of the
Malampaya natural-gas reservoir. Another is the higher
price that Napocor pays for the coal that it sources
from its suppliers. Here, there is no long-term supply
agreement that Napocor eked out, putting the firm at
risk on the volatile energy prices.
Another
alarming thing was President Arroyo’s pronouncement that
she would lower Napocor’s rates again by half. Was the
President ill-advised on this politically motivated
pricing decision for the power sector? Remember the last
time, on
May 1, 2002, when she instructed Napocor to lower rates by 80
centavos and capped the power- purchase agreement at a
fixed rate of 40 centavos. By capping its rates, the
Napocor selling price ceased to reflect any movements in
its cost of fuel and cost of power purchased from its
independent power producers.
With
world fuel prices surging in the ensuing years,
Napocor’s selling prices soon no longer reflected their
true costs. The years 2002, 2003 and 2004 witnessed the
largest losses in Napocor’s history, hitting a peak of a
P110-billion net loss in a single year (2003). That
year, the loss of Napocor accounted for more than a
third of the entire Consolidated Public Sector Deficit.
In turn, however, these losses were funded by
increasingly higher levels of government guaranteed
debt.
Napocor’s total liabilities in 2003 reached a whopping
P1.2 trillion. That figure was more than nine times the
yearly national education budget and 75 times the annual
national health budget. And we must also not forget that
among the most pressing reasons government passed the
E-VAT law was that it needed to raise funds drastically
to cover its massive debts—more than 60 percent of which
was Napocor’s, primarily due to government subsidized
energy rates and plain management ineptitude.
The
irony is that subsidizing the power sector through low
Napocor rates results in a massive subsidy to the rich
at the expense of the poor. The rich, it must be
remembered, can afford to go on their wasteful ways. But
the poor cannot. Why is this so? Because FIES (Family
Income and Expenditure Survey) data shows that 92
percent of the residential kilowatt-hours consumed in
the country go to rich Class A and B families. Only 8
percent of those kilowatt-hours are consumed by poor
Class C, D and E households. That is one side issue that
should be considered in the ongoing Meralco media war.
E-mail: hugagni@yahoo.com |