|
AMID
brewing debate over high power rates, the militant
Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) urged a government
audit of the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) aside from a
recommendation of removing the value-added tax (VAT) on
power rates and the scrapping of the system-loss charge
of distribution utilities if the government really wants
public consumers to be unburdened from high power rates.
“From
yesterday’s Joint Congressional Power Commission
hearing, we could see that Meralco, Napocor [National
Power Corp.] and the Energy Regulatory Commission [ERC]
had their share of responsibilities on why power rates
are high. At the end of the day, it is still
government’s responsibility to protect consumers. This
can only be done through government intervention in and
regulation of the power sector,” said Bayan
secretary-general Renato Reyes Jr.
“The
problem with the power sector is not a simple one. The
Arroyo government has dug consumers such a deep hole
after the passage of the Electric Power Industry Reform
Act [Epira]. There have been mutations. Deregulation,
privatization, high taxes and inconsistent regulation in
the power industry have all contributed to high power
rates,” the Bayan leader added.
Reyes
said subjecting Meralco to a Commission on Audit (COA)
audit is based on a 2006 order issued by the Supreme
Court (G.R. 166769, December 6, 2006) in relation to a
case filed by Bayan against Meralco in the unbundling of
rates.
While
upholding the unbundling and rate adjustment of Meralco
in 2003, the Supreme Court also ordered the ERC to seek
the help of the COA in auditing Meralco to determine if
its rates are reasonable. The ERC and the COA have yet
to release the results of the audit, if there has been
any conducted.
Bayan
also proposed the rejection of the P14-billion
Napocor-Meralco settlement that aims to pass on bad
debts to consumers, of which petition it said has been
pending before the ERC for four years now; rejection of
the Napocor-Power Sector Assets and Liabilities
Management Corp. petition to allow the recovery of P9
billion in generation charges that resulted from
“market-power abuse” in the Wholesale Electricity Spot
Market from August to November 2006, which petition is
currently pending before the ERC;
Stricter
regulation and monitoring of Napocor fuel procurement to
prevent overpriced emergency coal purchases which raise
generation rates; possibility of long-term contracts
should be considered to protect consumers from rising
coal prices; review of all independent power producer
contracts of Napocor and other distribution utilities
and disallowing take-or-pay provisions that are usually
disadvantageous to consumers; and scrapping of the Epira
and an immediate stop to the deregulation and
privatization of the power sector in favor of a more
regulated environment where rates can be thoroughly
scrutinized.
“The
removal of the VAT on electricity and the system-loss
charge will save consumers a combined P1.42/kWh
[kilowatt-hours]. Those consuming 200 kWh a month can
easily save P284 a month. We would like to see
government address these issues immediately,” Reyes
said.
“The COA
audit of Meralco, on the other hand, may help us better
understand how companies with interlocking interests
from generation and distribution really work. This can
shed light on the corporate practices of Meralco and its
affiliates that are now being questioned by lawmakers.
Consumers are entitled to know more on how rates are
fixed and what contributes to rising prices,” he added.
Meanwhile, consumer group POWER reiterated its call to
scrap the VAT on power rates, saying the government
charges are “patently unjust and outrageous.”
Power
convenor engineer Ramon Ramirez said the VAT was being
imposed even on such electricity-bill items like system
losses, lifeline subsidies and even on the franchise
tax.
“System
losses are comprised of technical losses and losses
incurred due to pilferage. There is really no sense as
to why this item has to be subjected to the VAT. Why is
the government taxing electricity pilferage and system
inefficiency? It’s bad enough we are being charged for
used electricity, now government wants to earn revenues
from unused power,” Ramirez said.
As to
the franchise tax, Ramirez said this item was included
in the computation of the 12-percent VAT on distribution
which Meralco also collects on behalf of the government.
The tax on the franchise tax falls under “distribution
revenues and subsidies” under the heading of “government
taxes.” |