|
FOREIGN
businessmen in the country are dissatisfied with the
2008 Investment Priorities Plan (IPP) that was approved
by the Cabinet as they believe it was not
target-oriented and specific enough to be really
effective as an investment-promotions tool.
The
Foreign Chambers of the Philippines (FCP), in a letter
to Trade Secretary Peter Favila, a copy of which was
obtained by the BusinessMirror, also expressed
disappointment that its representatives were never
invited in the public hearings conducted by the Board of
Investments (BOI) before the IPP was finalized and
submitted to Malacañang for approval.
Had they
been invited, the FCP said its representatives would
have raised several issues that they feel are important
to the foreign business community.
The FCP—composed
of the chambers of the American, Canadian,
Australian-New Zealand, Japanese, Korean, and European
businessmen here, plus the association of multinational
regional headquarters in the Philippines—said the group
had long wanted to be consulted in the IPP because it
believes foreign direct investments (FDI) in the country
could be raised substantially if the various barriers
and disincentives would be removed.
Nonetheless, the group still forwarded its comments to
the IPP in its letter to Favila.
“We feel
the list approved by the Cabinet is not specific enough.
If we are to use the IPP as a tool for investment
promotion, it should be target-oriented, highlighting
the specific sectors the government wishes to be
developed by providing investment incentives,” the group
said in the letter.
For
instance, in the agriculture and agribusiness heading,
the FCP said emphasis should have been given on the
development of agro-industrial estates to bring together
the farming community and food processors.
In
infrastructure, the emphasis should have been on sea,
land and air transport, as well as energy.
For
tourism, the FCP said it would have appreciated if
medical and retirement zones were covered.
For
engineered products and strategic investments, the group
said the types of projects should have been specifically
identified “so investors can be guided to the strategic
requirements of the country.”
The
foreign chambers also wondered why the business-process
outsourcing sector was not in the list, considering it
needs a great amount of support if the Philippines is to
attain its target of capturing 10 percent of the world’s
outsourcing and offshoring market by 2010.
The FCP
also recommended that the required entry investments for
foreign retailers be lowered.
On the
employment of foreign nationals, the group asked for the
selective opening of the restrictions in architecture,
engineering, medicine and medical technology and
geology, among others, to help address the needs of
growing industries such as medical travel and
retirement, as well as mining and creative industries.
Although
the 2008 IPP has been finalized, the group is still
seeking a meeting with Favila and BOI managing head
Elmer Hernandez to “obtain more precise guidance on how
the 2008 IPP will be interpreted.”
“At the
same time, we wish to put on record to be included in
the discussions leading to the 2009 IPP,” the group
said. |