HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    Power grabs and baseless charges

    BY power grab, we mean the manipulation of sleeping funds to raid profitable enterprises, eventually to resell to interests lurking in the shadows. There are precedents in this gambit, utilized when the hierarchy controls dormant pensions contributed by taxpayers and government employees.

    See where, in banking, these were aggressively used to invade private corporate ownership to benefit friends and fill the pockets of cronies. Never mind liquidity requisites and pensioner needs. Never mind the imprudence that endangers fiduciary capital and severely slows services. The old pensioners will soon die, anyway, and public-school teachers were never really important. They can be kidnapped when they complain. Or they can be ignored.

    Why waste state pension funds on the needy? Quiescent pensions can be lethal war chests. Hostile takeovers won with booty are not about competence. They are about greed.

    By baseless charges, we do not mean the distribution rates charged by Manila Electric Co. (Meralco). Since 2003, these have petrified. Rather, we refer to accusations by paragons of Gloria Arroyo’s virtue invoking innuendo and insinuations to pin increased generation tariffs on a distribution utility.

    In Meralco’s mauling, pit bulls were let loose, albeit collars and dog tags identify who tugs the leash and pulls the strings.

    The data neither substantiate the accusations nor any logic. To be fair, let us cite easily accessible data that need neither insidious directorships to filch nor a modicum of intelligence to understand. Let us use the figures of the National Power Corp. (Napocor) and engage, at most, three brain cells so officials might understand each of generation, transmission and distribution costs in electricity tariffs.

    As any sophomoric analyst would do, let us focus on delta variances to analyze why electricity rates increased.

    Napocor’s generation cost is a blend from different plants and fuels. The cheapest are geothermal and hydroelectric sources. Recently a substantial amount of these were sold, thus increasing the ratio of expensive and dollar-depleting fossils—coal, bunker and oil-fired plants—available to Napocor.

    In July 2007 Napocor’s average generation rate for Luzon was P3.89/kilowatt-hour (kWh). When adjustments to GRAM (generation rate adjustment mechanism) and Icera (incremental currency exchange rate adjustments) are added following the Energy Regulatory Commission’s (ERC) deferred accounting formula, Napocor’s effective rate increased from P3.89/kwh to P4.50/kWh from July to December 2007.

    From January 2008 onward, as Icera reflected dollar declines, delayed GRAM reflected the exponential increases of oil and other fossil-fuel costs. While the average generation rate remained at P3.89/kWh, appended additives inflated the generation total to P4.76/kWh and beyond.

    Utilizing more fossil fuels increased Napocor’s tariffs. Unprivatized hydroelectric plants that generated cheaper power slacked off as maintenance downtimes and fuel supplies plagued Napocor. When summer came, demand increased and oversupplies thinned out, aggravated by Arroyo’s failure to attract new investments in generation capacity.

    In an undersupply market where distributors are compelled to purchase from spot markets, the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM) rates fly north. More when peaking diesel plants determine values at which WESM bids are settled.

    When it debuted, WESM rates were P3.38/kWh. That quickly bloated by 150 percent to P8.40/kWh within four months, thereby accumulating an incremental P9 billion, eventually burdened on Meralco customers. Today WESM’s P7.64/kWh rates are higher than Napocor’s.

    WESM should have made trading transparent and the market efficient. But the uncompetitive domination of long-term bilateral contracts between Napocor and the cooperatives, plus PSALM’ the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp.’s (PSALM) market power reduce WESM to a simple venue for those with excesses selling to those with short-term shortages.

    Because of debt that accounts for over 50 percent of our deficit, Napocor coddles these bilateral contracts. With GRAM and Icera inflating Napocor’s rate and WESM tariffs bloated by an undersupply, generation rates can only increase.

    When the ERC investigated price-fixing charges against PSALM, they discovered “bid offers submitted for Ilijan, Pagbilao and Sual were increased to P10,000/MW and higher starting August 30 [2006] for peak hours. It is observed that ALL THREE plants’ bids started at P10, 000. . . EXACT SIMILARITIES [caps supplied] on the price offers . . . occurred on 30 and 31 August 2006, for the time period 1100H to 2100H.”

    For plants with different capacities, fuels and economies, “exact similarities” are incredible. Add charges of price-fixing and market-power abuse where three PSALM traders, supposedly simulating competition, sit back-to-back in one third-floor room immediately above the cafeteria within the Napocor compound, and we soon realize that the highest tariffs spawn from WESM and Napocor.

    On transmission costs, tariffs are no longer capped by a statutory 12-percent return-on-rate base. Employing ERC’s performance based rate mechanism, among others, tariffs are a function of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). For the National Transmission Corp. WACC is 15.85 percent. A 32.08-percent increase, this remains until 2010 when a recalibration is scheduled.

    Sourcing substantively from Napocor and marginally from WESM to accommodate demand, Meralco measures up. Its limited sources, two from natural-gas plants, one from coal, are cheaper, having substantially indigenous fuels and fewer currency vulnerabilities. Also, with relatively proximate sources, two from Laguna, one from Mauban, transmission charges are halved at P0.66/kWh against Napocor’s P1.54/kWh, while T-line losses are less. With actual system losses at 8 percent (1.5 percent below the statutory limit of 9.5 percent), when maximized to mitigate economic offtake requisites, the generation costs average P4.24/kWh. That’s a P0.52/kWh savings compared to Napocor’s generation cost (inclusive of GRAM and Icera) that start from P4.76/kWh and up.

    Unfortunately, within the cost structure of the natural-gas plants Meralco sources from and which supply over 40 percent of Luzon’s needs, state royalties run as high as 55 percent. These go directly to Arroyo’s coffers, thus discouraging indigenous energy usage in favor of higher-cost fuels.

    What a stupid policy. Again, we see where generation rates balloon. Literally and figuratively, dogs are barking up the wrong tree. Before they howl and yelp, they should do as dogs do. Lick clean their own sphincters first.

    OTHER STORIES
    Editorial: Consumer welfare should be paramount

    THE Joint Congressional Power Commission convenes today, Monday, to inquire into high electricity rates. The Senate panel is headed by Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, who makes no secret of her support for the Arroyo administration, while the House panel is headed by presidential son Pampanga Rep. Mikey Arroyo.

    read more

    Through the Looking Glass: Power grabs and baseless charges

    BY power grab, we mean the manipulation of sleeping funds to raid profitable enterprises, eventually to resell to interests lurking in the shadows. There are precedents in this gambit, utilized when the hierarchy controls dormant pensions contributed by taxpayers and government employees.

    read more

    Coast-to-Coast: Meralco’s plight; Qatar’s flight

    IT is well that everybody, including the protagonists in what is now being touted as the biggest and, by the looks of it, the most acrimonious corporate battle in recent memory over the country’s biggest power-distribution utility, Manila Electric Co. (Meralco), have agreed on a common objective—reduce the power rates in the country.

    read more

    Personal Finance: The pressures of education

    A FEW days ago I was a guest at Shop Talk, a show on ANC. I may be a Registered Financial Planner and a Personal Finance Educator and all that, but I guess what really qualifies me on the subject is my being a parent to four wonderful kids—two girls (Billie and Gabbie) and two boys (Riggs and Chino).

    read more

    The Entrepreneur: Agriculture as engine of growth—Part 2

    FORESIGHT has served me well in private business. This is why I firmly believe that preparing for the future will also serve our country well. And another lesson in business that should also be an important part of governance is that there are opportunities in times of crisis.

    read more

    Reflections from the Mirror: Unanswered questions

    NOW that the issue involving Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) has become the talk of the town, there is one aspect that I think should be brought out in the open so we can have a clear and total picture of Meralco’s operations. I refer to the collection of water-meter deposits which I understand is around P3,000 per meter, subject to refund once the user gives up the contract.

    read more