HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Solgen bucks P20-B deal of NPC, Meralco
     
    By Joel San Juan and Zach Solmerin

    THE Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) has opposed the P20.5-billion joint settlement agreement between the National Power Corp. (Napocor) and the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) to resolve their dispute over the 10-year contract requiring Meralco to purchase electricity from Napocor, saying it placed “at great risk” the finances of the government.

    Meralco has defaulted on the required purchases of power, but under the joint agreement, the Napocor waived its claims under the contract.

    The National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms Inc. (Nasecore) estimated the receivables from Meralco in the amount of P52 billion, representing principal, interest and surcharges on Meralco’s failure to purchase contracted power with Napocor based on their 10-year sales contract.

    Government chief counsel Agnes Devanadera has asked the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) to declare null and void “for being contrary to law, morals and public policy” the joint settlement agreement based on the fact that the agreement was not submitted by the Napocor for review by the OSG, in violation of the Revised Administrative Code of 1987, Executive Order 292 and the charter of Napocor.

    She also agreed with the position of the Nasecore that the pass-on provision of the agreement will result in an electricity-rate increase of around P0.12 per kilowatt-hour (kWh).

    The Solgen also accused Napocor of going beyond its authority when it waived its claims under the contract, making the agreement illegal and disadvantageous to the government. She added it was not only imprudent for the Napocor board not to pursue the claim against Meralco, considering its present financial standing, but such decision also “effectively. . .placed  at  a great  risk the financial  resources of  the  government.” 

     She said the Supreme Court has held that an agreement which tends to operate to the detriment of the public interest is against public policy and, therefore, void. “It being  an onerous  provision inimical to  the interest of  the consuming public, the  same  should be  struck  down  for  being  against public interest and public  policy,” stressed Devanadera.

    The Nasecore has been prodding Napocor to pursue the P52-billion receivables of Napocor from Meralco, and has also asked the ERC to dismiss the application for the approval of the settlement agreement, but the ERC has yet to act on its motion, prompting Nasecore to seek the OSG’s intervention.

    Under the joint agreement signed in 2003, Meralco’s failure to follow the agreement has placed it in the position of being liable to pay Napocor an estimated amount of P27.5 billion in unconsumed energy, which is equivalent to 18,222 gigawatt-hours (gWh) valued at P1.51 per kWh.

    The agreement also required Napocor to give Meralco credit due to the delayed completion of transmission facilities as well as for energy corresponding to Napocor’s sales to directly-connected customers located in Meralco’s existing franchise areas, which corresponds to P7.465 billion.

    The agreement further states that such credit substantially reduced the claim of Napocor to P 20.05 billion—to be passed on to Meralco’s 4 million consumers.

    “The  delivery of  electricity to  the consuming  public  involves  public  service  that affects national  security, economic  growth and public interest. Thus, it is  quite unfathomable  to learn that  the  settlement  agreement  amounting  to billions of pesos  never  passed  the  legal  mill  of  the  Office of  the Solicitor General,” said Devanadera.

    “As  the  counsel for  the Republic,  the  OSG  must  ensure  that  it  must  protect the interest of  the consumer, promote his general  welfare by protecting  it  against  deceptive, unfair and  unconscionable  acts  and practices,” she added.

    The OSG further noted that Napocor’s charter did not grant the energy body the power to compromise or release any settled claim, since such power belongs to the Commission on Audit (COA) as provided by Presidential Decree 1445 or the Government Auditing Code of the Philippines.

    She added that under Executive Order 292, the power to compromise was to be exercised only by the COA with the approval of the President if the amount involves more than P100,000.

    “The required approvals were never sought by Napocor....Thus, Napocor’s original claim from Meralco for contracted but unconsumed energy was reduced by around P7.465 billion.  The reduction constituted a waiver of a valid claim worth billions of pesos, and the Napocor board went beyond the authorized limits set by existing laws.”  

    OTHER STORIES

    Electric face-off at PowerCom


    Oil above $126; local gas prices rise P1 a liter


    FDC lists expensive-power factors


    Solgen bucks P20-B deal of NPC, Meralco


    Napocor prepays P11-B more debt


    Napocor to heed ERC’s call to explain Gram and Icera


    RP one of worst places for mothers, report says


    Amid death, junta seeks perpetuity


    LandBank opens commodity loan for 3rd cropping


    Indigenous exporters want new wage-hike exemption 


    ‘ODAs  swell debt, but also fund infra’


    Emerging markets to see lower flows as funds retreat


    Bunye to join Monetary Board