HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • FDC lists expensive-power factors
    By Paul A. Isla
    Reporter

    WITH prices of basic commodities and utilities skyrocketing, the consumer-and-debt watchdog Freedom from Debt Coalition (FDC) has laid the blame on a range of factors, saying bad governance to corruption to mismanagement to rent-seeking to framework concerns have caused power rates in the country to remain high.

    The FDC thus stressed these problems cannot be resolved fully without transforming the electricity industry into one “that is more responsive and accountable to the people, and more environmentally sustainable.”

    It is set to present a paper to Congress probers on high power rates, listing “10 reasons why electricity bills are high.”

    For one, the FDC said the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) allows the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco), other distribution utilities (DUs) and the National Transmission Corp. (Transco) to earn over and above what used to be the statutory return on rate base of 8 percent to 12 percent.

     It also noted that the Arroyo government wants to attract private investors to purchase National Power Corp.’s (Napocor) assets, and for the assets to become attractive, electricity rates have to be high. “The higher the winning bidder bids, the higher the electricity price we have to pay in the future so the winning bidder can recover its investment.”

    The FDC also alleged that the government did not renegotiate the contracts with Napocor’s independent power producers, or IPPs, and that these contracts require Napocor to purchase electricity whether or not these are actually generated or dispatched, and to supply fuel to IPPs that are in operation.

    The price Napocor agreed to pay for this electricity was overstated to begin with, and many of these contracts have clauses that allow the IPP to raise rates over time. Napocor also bears the risk of peso devaluation and the risk of the cost of fuel, such as oil and coal, going up, said the FDC.

    “We have been paying for these contracts in our electric bills for over a decade, and we continue to pay for these today, although this is less transparent, thanks to unbundling. With world oil and coal prices hitting all-time highs, with the peso now at P40 to the dollar compared with P26 to a dollar when these contracts were signed, the cost of these contracts are an excessive burden on ordinary Filipino electricity consumers,” said FDC, adding that even consumers that do not have electricity at home are also made to pay for these contracts because the government guarantees all of Napocor’s obligations to the IPPs.

    The FDC also stressed that Napocor rates, on the other hand, are generally cheaper owing to the P0.30 per kilowatt-hour mandated reduction required by the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (Epira) for electricity generated by Napocor or its IPPs.

    The FDC also pinned the blame for high electricity prices to a number of ERC decisions, among others, one dismissing the market-abuse case against the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp. alleged by the Philippine Electricity Market Corp., the operator of the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market.

    Following the logic of privatization and market reforms, the Epira states that instruments such as cross-subsidies that distort the “real” price of electricity should be removed, according to the FDC.

    “This is in keeping with the transformation of electricity industry from a public service industry to a commodity market,” said the FDC, adding that the prices should be subjected to market rules alone—and considerations such as equity and justice in the provision of electricity should be abolished.

    FDC said households no longer enjoy subsidies from the industrial and commercial sectors, and households in Mindanao and Visayas are no longer being subsidized by households in Luzon, and such households that enjoyed subsidies in pre-EPIRA days have experienced a hike in rates as a result of the removal of these subsidies.

    Moreover, corruption in Napocor— including allegations of “overpricing” in the process of buying coal and oil supply for Napocor-owned power plants and Napocor-IPPs—artificially inflates generation charges, said FDC.

    OTHER STORIES

    Electric face-off at PowerCom


    Oil above $126; local gas prices rise P1 a liter


    FDC lists expensive-power factors


    Solgen bucks P20-B deal of NPC, Meralco


    Napocor prepays P11-B more debt


    Napocor to heed ERC’s call to explain Gram and Icera


    RP one of worst places for mothers, report says


    Amid death, junta seeks perpetuity


    LandBank opens commodity loan for 3rd cropping


    Indigenous exporters want new wage-hike exemption 


    ‘ODAs  swell debt, but also fund infra’


    Emerging markets to see lower flows as funds retreat


    Bunye to join Monetary Board