|
A
MILITANT group has called on the country’s lawmakers to
cross party lines and conduct a thorough investigation
into the Philippines-China fisheries accord and 35 other
agriculture and fisheries agreements which top
agriculture officials, headed by Secretary Arthur Yap,
signed on behalf of President Arroyo.
The
Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya)
made the call on suspicion that the agreements, like the
controversial Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership
Agreement (Jpepa), were too lopsided that the
Philippines would be at the losing end of the deals.
In a
statement, the group said Malacañang and the Department
of Agriculture merely put the RP-China fisheries accord
and 35 other deals on hold to pacify the outrage against
such lopsided deals.
“This
strategy of Malacañang should not prevent the Senate
from probing these 36 rural agreements which are 1,000
times more explosive than the ZTE scam and the RP-Spratly
offshore-mining deal,” Pamalakaya said.
The
militant group has also recently filed diplomatic
protests against the RP-China fisheries accord and the
Joint Marine Seismic Understanding (JMSU) before the
Chinese Consular Office in
Makati.
The
House of Representatives on Wednesday conducted a
hearing on the controversial RP-China fisheries, and was
told that the accord will allow Chinese fishermen to
fish even in municipal waters which are currently
reserved for 1.8 million small fishermen and their 8
million dependents.
The
congressmen in Wednesday’s hearing of the House
Committee on Agriculture chaired by Palawan Rep. Abraham
Mitra were told the fisheries agreement and 35 other
deals in agriculture and fisheries were suspended while
consultations are being held with the affected sectors.
Congressmen are now contemplating on pushing for the
cancellation of 36 agreements on agricultural projects
entered into by the Philippine government with China
that included the allocation of at least 1 million
hectares of land for production of agricultural products
for China’s consumption.
Mitra
said there may be a violation of the Constitution on
these deals.
“The
Department of Agriculture through Undersecretary Bernie
Fondevilla admitted that the Constitution only allows
the lease of alienable land of up to 1,000 hectares. But
these agreements involved no less than 1,040,000
hectares of land to be leased to Chinese firms,” said
Mitra.
“Is that
legal and constitutional?” he asked.
Under
the agreements entered into by the Philippine government
with China, the former would lease a total of 1,040,000
hectares of land to be used for the production of hybrid
rice, hybrid corn, hybrid sorghum and cassava.
Mitra
added that another issue that is bugging is that all
products produced from the leased lands would not be
subjected to tariff.
“While
the government, by practice, does not impose on local
products exported, the produce coming from those leased
lands are no longer local products but Chinese products.
So why would you exempt them from tariff?” Mitra said.
Kabalikat ng Malayang Pilipino (Kampi) Rep. Roman Romulo
of Pasig agreed with Mitra and said that while all the
agreements have been suspended, he would welcome a total
cancellation for contracts for agricultural
undertakings.
Independent Rep. Roilo Golez of Parañaque said it was
rather ironic for the country to allocate more than 1
million hectares to China for agricultural purposes when
the country is experiencing a crisis in food itself.
“We have
only 9 million hectares of arable lands, around 4.2
million hectares devoted to rice and corn and less than
one million hectares of which are irrigated. Now, here
were are leasing more than 1 million hectares of land to
China of which we have to provide irrigation and the
farm-to-market roads when we ourselves cannot provide
irrigation and farm-to-market roads for our farmers,”
said Golez.
“It’s
rather ironic that we should allocate some P15 billion
to provide irrigation for the 1 million hectares of land
we would lease to China and construct farm-to-market
roads to produce food for China when we are having a
food crisis ourselves,” he added.
Mitra
said he is supporting the position of Malacañang to
suspend the agreements in view of the food crisis. But
Pamalakaya said the outright scrapping of these
agreements is the best political solution and not just
its suspension. |