|
Controlling jurisprudence has been consistent that
organization and commencement of transactions of
corporate business are but conditions subsequent and not
a prerequisite for the acquisition of the corporate
personality. Even the adoption and filing of bylaws is
also a condition subsequent. Under Section 19 of the
Corporation Code of the Philippines, a corporation
commences its corporate existence and juridical
personality and is deemed incorporated from the date the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issues the
certificate of incorporation under its official seal. In
fact, such certificate may even be issued prior to the
filing of its bylaws, which under Section 46 of the said
Code, must be adopted “within one month after receipt of
official notice of the issuance of its certificate of
incorporation.” (Chung Ka Bio, et al., petitioners, vs.
Intermediate Appellate Court, et. al., INC.,
respondents. G.R. 71837. July 26, 1988.)
Primary
registration with the SEC grants juridical or artificial
personality to the entity, however, to undertake
certain business activities (example: broker or dealer
in securities) requires a secondary license from the
SEC. The primary registration also does not constitute a
permit to undertake activities for which other
government agencies require a special or separate
license or permit.
We deal
here with are legal consequences when two or more
persons not organized as a juridical personality enter
into a business transaction or exercise the powers or
functions of a corporation. The Supreme Court held that
a voluntary unincorporated association or entity has no
power to enter into, or to ratify, a contract. A
contract entered into by its officers or agents on
behalf of such entity is not binding on, or enforceable
against it. The officers or agents are themselves
personally liable (International Express Travel & Tour
Services Inc., petitioner, vs. Hon. Court of Appeals,
respondents. G.R. 119002. October 19, 2000). It has
also been ruled that an entity without juridical
personality as defendant in a case or when two or more
persons not organized as an entity with juridical
personality enter into a transaction, may be sued under
the name (by which) they are generally or commonly known
(Lapanday Agricultural & Development Corp., petitioner,
vs. Maximo Estita, et. al., G.R. 162109. January 21,
2005). (See also Section 15, Rule 3, of the 1997 Rules
of Civil Procedure). But even assuming, in gratia
argumenti, that an entity does not have a juridical
personality, it nonetheless may be sued as such if it is
known to have been transacting business with third
persons (Ibid).
On the
other hand there are certain rules with regard to what
is legally termed as “ostensible” corporations, another
way of dealing with unincorporated entities. A third
party who while knowing an association or entity to be
unincorporated, nonetheless treated it as a corporation
and received benefits from it, is barred from denying
its corporate existence in a suit brought against the
alleged corporation. In such case, all who benefit from
the transaction made by the ostensible corporation,
despite knowledge of the legal defects in its
incorporation, can be held liable for contracts entered
with it since there is implied assent to or advantage in
such dealing (Ibid). |