|
THE
Senate has suddenly resurrected the issue of Charter
change (Cha-cha). I hope there is no hidden agenda
behind this, but in principle, this Senate move should
be supported. This will call for a constituent assembly,
although the people’s-initiative law is very much alive
after the Supreme Court validated it. Now that it’s the
Senate asking for charter change—and coming at that from
the opposition in that chamber—let us listen to all
those who were attacking the move whenever the
administration espouses constitutional reforms.
What
does the Church say?
The
senators are pushing for a federal system of government
and have surprised everyone by opting for Charter change
at a time when no one was expecting it. Some say that
Cha-cha is inevitable and the senators do not want to be
left out in the cold. Remember that previous calls for
Charter change included a proposal to shift to a
parliamentary system, which will effectively eliminate
the Senate. This surely is one of the reasons that
senators are opting for amendments now to ward off moves
to write finish to their institution. Whatever their
excuses may be, one thing is certain: The uneasy times
call for the rewriting of our Constitution to reflect
present needs and directions for the people and for the
nation; otherwise, the country will always remain in
conflict with itself.
More on
this later.
****
ONCE
again we have proven that Filipino brainpower is the
backbone of our drive for world economic excellence.
Overseas Filipino workers spread out all over the globe
are much preferred by foreign employers. Filipino
doctors, nurses and other medical professionals occupy
preferred positions in foreign medical facilities, and
just recently, Australia announced its plan to hire
thousands of Filipino nurses in the immediate future.
The
outsourcing business involving call centers and other
offshoring and similar undertakings are raking in
unparalleled revenues—considering that it is practically
a newborn industry—and is expected to contribute 8
percent of the gross domestic product until 2010, higher
than the present share of old reliables like finance,
real estate or transportation and communications. The
Philippines is now one of the top three top players in
this field and is still growing. Call centers and other
similar establishments have offered young professionals
and even undergraduates a venue where they can blend in
naturally using basic knowledge of the English language
and college-level education. Whatever our kids are doing
in this field, it is clear that they are doing it well.
Let us support this industry with attractive incentives,
not destroy it with restrictive and constrictive
measures and laws. It is, in fact, a showcase of
Filipino excellence to the world.
****
THE
chief of staff of the Armed Forces announced that they
have so far neutralized only eight out of 87 New
People’s Army (NPA) guerilla fronts. To Metro Manilans
who are not directly threatened by the brutality of NPA
tactics and hit-and-run style of warfare where civilians
are mostly the hapless victims, this number does not
change anything at all. The NPAs are still there and
they can always reinvigorate their ranks like a humanoid
in the movies. But to government forces battling the
self-styled guerillas for years, this is a big reduction
of hostile forces. Without nationwide logistics and
support, weakened NPA units may be encouraged to give up
their lost cause and go back to the fold of the law.
After all, it has become less of an ideological cause
and more of a survival reality show. And who profits?
Not the peasant foot soldiers in the fields and their
families who were made more miserable by their plight.
Kawawa naman ang mga inililigaw nating kababayan.
****
A LOT of
critics are attacking me for my alleged statement that
the government will give up its Spratlys claim. This is
farthest from the truth because I never said such a
thing. Some people twisted my words and manufactured my
statement.
I am
happy with the story that appeared in the Philippine
Daily Inquirer that was totally accurate. What I
actually said was that we should be prudent with our
approach to the Spratly issue in connection with our
baseline proposal, considering that within our Kalayaan
Island Group, China and Vietnam have already fortified
and occupied a number of islands. How can we include
these Chinese- and Vietnam-occupied and fortified
islands in our baseline proposal and risk confrontation
with these two powers?
At any
rate, this issue is pending in the Senate and the House,
so in due time we can elucidate further to clear the
position of the government. |