HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
     
    On property and casualty insurance

    MANY of us have some form of property and casualty insurance, or more commonly referred to as nonlife insurance. We probably have motor-car insurance, fire insurance or personal-accident insurance. However, I dare say that so many of us who do have some form of coverage are not really aware what this form of insurance is all about.

    When you compare life insurance and property and casualty insurance, you will notice that the only thing similar with them is the term “insurance.” Let’s try to demystify property and casualty insurance.

    So what is property and casualty insurance? Property and casualty insurance is an agreement whereby one undertakes for a consideration to indemnify another against loss, damage or liability arising from an unknown or contingent event. The definition is clear about how property insurance operates. For the insured, it means that the agreement is merely to help him recover what was actually lost due to the unknown or contingent event. A contract of indemnity is therefore exclusive to property insurance.

    Why is there a need for this type of insurance? Well, for starters, it really is a risk-distributing device. A person puts money called premium to a common fund and distributes his risk to the group. There is no way for a person to know in advance whether he will receive compensation more than he has contributed or that he will be merely paying for the loss of others.

    The primary goal of a person getting insurance coverage is to assure himself that he will not shoulder the loss alone. He may gamble, take his chance that he may be able to steer his property away from a loss and its devastating effect. But putting a minimum amount, and considering that such amount is the only sum he is bound to lose in case a loss actually occurs, is the logic behind getting protection for your property. However, it is unfortunate that most Filipinos still cling to his fatalistic philosophy of bahala na. When the loss happens, it is already too late.

    Risk is an everyday reality. This is the reason people make calculations instinctively to avoid risk. They forget that their own negligence (lack of foresight, lack of skill to prevent loss) is the paramount reason why property insurance is there in the first place.

    Aside from its primary function, property and casualty insurance also has other functions.

    It stimulates business enterprise—Insurance has made possible and helps maintain the present-day large-scale commercial and industrial organizations. It enables them to use their capital in the development of their business and obtain financial security against risks, instead of freezing business capital just to guard against various contingencies. Because of reduced risks also, capitalists are able to venture into other projects.

    It stimulates business efficiency—Since businesses can worry less about losses, they can concentrate more on the prosecution of their business.

    Promotes loss prevention—Insurers allow taking risks from well-maintained and quality machineries, equipment or properties.

    Investment of funds—Insurers accumulate large funds and these are invested in the economy. Moreover, the funds of business enterprises do not remain static but are used productively, resulting in lesser premiums. Moreover, the process produced by business is reduced, benefiting the public. Although cost of insurance is integrated in the prices of commodities, the amount is significantly lesser than the amount without insurance.

    Basis of credit—Credit extension is the most important phase of modern business and is contributed to by virtually all forms of insurance. Thus, in the case of a mortgage upon a real estate, no mortgagee is willing to lend money unless he knows that the value of the property is protected from destruction.

    Surely, the foundation and purpose of property and casualty insurance is really much more complex that what was explained here. One also needs to understand about risks and hazards to be able to have a better appreciation of insurance.

    Risk is the chance of loss. If a loss is absolutely certain to happen, no risk is involved. Peril is the contingent or unknown event which may cause a loss. The peril is that which is insured against because without such peril, the risk is absent. Examples of perils are fire, flood, accident, theft, illness, etc. The insurance company can choose what perils it will be willing to except the insured from. This is what is also termed as insurable risk. But risks, to be insurable, must meet certain requirements:

    Importance—The loss to be insured against should be grave enough to support a contract of insurance. Not all losses would have to be insured. The object must have some economic value, so that losing it would put the insured in some degree of pecuniary disadvantage.

    Calculability—The loss must be possible to estimate as to its probability. This is particularly important in order to determine the amount of premium and the amount to cover, so as to protect the insurance industry.

    Definiteness of loss—The losses should be fairly definite as to cause, time and place.

    No catastrophic loss—This is against the law of large numbers. When large numbers of people are subject to the same kind of losses at the same time, insurance becomes a risk-accepting business rather than a risk-distributing device. The losses of the few are no longer borne by the many who did not suffer a loss. Only small occasional losses are insurable.

    Accidental in nature—Insurance is intended to cover accidental or unexpected losses. If the loss is not accidental, sudden or unexpected, there is definitely no risk. Payment made to a party whose loss is expected is contrary to public policy and morals.

    The perils that conform to these requirements are proper for supporting an insurance contract.

    Hazard, on the other hand, is the condition or factor, tangible or intangible, which may create or increase the risk from a given peril. Hazards are what create a peril, which, in turn, creates a risk. In the insurance environment, hazards are:

    Physical hazards—those relating to location, structure, occupancy, exposure to the surroundings and other similar things like inherent vices that make the thing very susceptible to loss.

    Moral hazards—those relating to the mental attitude of the person.

    Morale hazard—pertains to the attitude or character of a person.

    Whew, this column has turned out to be a minilecture on the fundamentals of insurance. Since we pay good money to get such insurance, isn’t it about time we start understanding what we have been paying for all these years? I think so.

    ****

    J. Randell Tiongson is a training specialist, personal-finance educator and coach and a director of the Registered Financial Planning Institute. He has been engaged in the various facets of the financial-services industry for nearly two decades. He is also the cofounder of www.income-tacts.com with Efren Ll. Cruz, an interactive site dedicated to the financial literacy of every Pinoy. For inquiries, you may send an e-mail to randellt@gmail.com.

    OTHER STORIES
    Editorial: Emasculated 

    CHALK up another victory for the big pharmaceutical companies with the expected passage of a watered-down cheaper-medicines bill.

    read more

    Through the Looking Glass: Jpepa’s demand-side economics

    IN a global milieu of increasing scarcity of even the most basic food staples, in addition to induced and natural shortages of critical fuels, among the advantages the Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (Jpepa) presents as responses to these afflictions are systemic approaches that immediately globalize our innate assets and address our festering deficiencies.

    read more

    Mar-Vic Cagurangan: Living satire in the flying tube

    HAGATNA, Guam—Through the years that I’ve been flying, my austere expense account has condemned me to the economy class.

    read more

    Personal Finance: On property and casualty insurance

    MANY of us have some form of property and casualty insurance, or more commonly referred to as nonlife insurance. We probably have motor-car insurance, fire insurance or personal-accident insurance. However, I dare say that so many of us who do have some form of coverage are not really aware what this form of insurance is all about.

    read more

    The Entrepreneur: Let’s get our figures right!

    WHEN Global Source reported last month that the 7.3-percent growth in the Philippines’ gross domestic product (GDP) in 2007 might have been overstated, the immediate reaction was to label the New York-based think tank as an unfair skeptic or one with the usual western bias against developing economies.

    read more

    Coast-to-Coast: Enhance our claims, strengthen baselines

    ENHANCE our claims, strengthen our baselines” is the proposed “win-win” solution envisioned by Ilocos Norte Rep. Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. to break the impasse over the conflicting versions of a pending bill defining the country’s baselines.

    read more

    Reflections from the Mirror: Con-Ass, NPAs and the Spratlys

    THE Senate has suddenly resurrected the issue of Charter change (Cha-cha). I hope there is no hidden agenda behind this, but in principle, this Senate move should be supported.

    read more